Yeah, because it makes more sense. HoHum came in, obviously wanted to bandwagon. At the time I thought I had 1 vote on me and OGML had 2, so I was curious why he didn’t want to join the already established wagon, rather than start a new one. But that was entirely because I didn’t see Amrun’s vote on me. Bandwagonning me makes just as much sense as bandwagonning OGML to me at the moment.
Why did you jump off of OGML’s wagon though? Was it actually entirely because of my shitty “game over” joke or do you have a real reason?
Essentially I decided I'd rather wait for OGML to show up and react to the post first before I possibly push further. OGML hasn't posted yet, so I didn't see a point in questioning further when his answers will most likely be joke/non-answers. Probably a bad assumption, but I'm sticking to my guns with it.
I didn't answer you seriously because I didn't take your question seriously when it was followed by "If we hadn't already found scum in OGML I'd change my vote to you..."
Do
you
find it scummy or strange that Narrow changed his vote?
If you had your reasons to not pursue that line, fine (not really, but still). But why not at least try to start other conversation?
It being a serious question is pretty consistent with "I would change my vote to you". And you've played this game plenty, surely you realise moving my vote
off
an RVS wagon that had only just begun wouldn't be optimal...
In post 39, JKMatthews wrote:If you had your reasons to not pursue that line, fine (not really, but still). But why not at least try to start other conversation?
No other points of conversation were jumping out at me, being on page 1 with little content. I’m not going to force conversation if I have nothing to say.
It being a serious question is pretty consistent with "I would change my vote to you".
But it’s not at all consistent with “If we hadn't already found scum in OGML.”
And you've played this game plenty, surely you realise moving my vote
off
an RVS wagon that had only just begun wouldn't be optimal...
Yeah, what's your point? I had no reason to take that as anything other than an empty threat: “I would change my vote to you if it weren’t already attached to this meaningless RVS wagon.” Followed directly by a joke about already finding scum. I didn't take it as a legitimate post at all. Although this debate is a bit pointless.
If you replace "If we hadn't already found scum in OGML" with "If I didn't want to keep this wagon going to see what happens", it all become much clearer, right? But stating "If I didn't want to keep this wagon going to see what happens" changes any potential outcome of keeping the wagon going, so I didn't say that. And even still, I feel like it's a fairly obvious joking way of saying exactly that. Mayyyybe you didn't read it that way, but I dunno...
Is it really fair enough? Obviously you thought it was worth questioning...
But even saying that doesn't say a whole lot to me. It still tells me that any vote you put on me would be fairly weak because you'd still more or less rather see where the RVS wagon goes.
I'm saying fair enough to your thought of it being null. It sparked my curiosity, I questioned, got a bullshit answer, decided not to follow-up for the time being. If no one else was curious by it then that's fair enough.
I guessss I see your point. Still odd that you seemed intent on keeping things in RVS. I'm gonna keep my vote on you anyway.
I know, but aren't you interested WHY I think it's null...? If it's at odds to what you're thinking, I'd have thought you wanted clarification...
And you're total RVS vote is still on me. If you thought Narrow's behaviour was curious, and nothing much else has happened, does that mean you think my current inquiry of you is scummy?
