Basically, NotSci has been having his way with this game, and because you all suck, you fall exactly how he wants you to. Pretty much, any attempt so far to question him has been met with equivalently the following: I'm playing badly, and so (OMGUS) thinking I'm scum means you're scum or stupid. Of course, actually saying that would get somebody lynched on the spot. So, NotSci phrases it differently. Instead, from NoSci, it goes: Well, you can only be voting me for PL reasons, and we all know only scum and bad town support PL, so are you scum or bad town? I think
sums it up pretty well, and I'm sure anybody who's been reading over NotSci has seen that come up multiple times. The thing that NotSci fails to mention is the reason why you seem to only be able to vote him over PL reasons. That reason is he
hasn't given any content
that you can judge him on otherwise. For the record, NotSci currently has 184 posts. Seems pretty good, right? Well, I went through and divided all of those posts up into "good" posts, which help the game in some way, "troll" posts, which contribute nothing and are disruptive, and "worthless" posts which are A. fluff (most) B. a vote with no explanation (explanations or votes with explanations are put in "good") or C. a post were NotSci "defends" himself. I've also taken to liberty of counting how many times NotSci uses his "NotSci logic" to dismiss a claim somewhere. If any part of a post is considered good, it is labelled a good post and nothing else. In total, there were 26 troll posts, 106 worthless posts, and 52 good posts. When viewing these statistics, keep in mind about 75% of the worthless posts were fluff, that about 20% of the good posts were repeats of things said in other good posts, that 4 good posts were saying somebody was inactive, and that 11 good posts were only NotSci asking somebody else to contribute somehow. Throughout these posts, NotSci logic was used a total of 22 times. Also of note is that NotSci's first good post was his 14th post, and post #101 in the thread. Anyway, there's some other stuff I could say, like about how NotSci said he'd give detailed reads once he got some flips, and now that we have three, one of which is scum and one which NotSci himself helped to get, he still has yet to give a detailed read, or some of the more ridiculous cases of him using NotSci logic, but basically, if we look at NotSci without all the annoying fluff, he's an inactive player who throws random votes without committing and calls his attackers scum, and when you consider that he isn't that, but instead somebody like that who's proven to be around and flooding the thread with spam, I'm pretty sure you don't help the case. I feel like I haven't explained this very well, but I think you should all be able to figure out what I mean. So, NotSci, I want you to defend yourself from claims of :active lurking, lack of committed or explained reads, exception a townie who you lynched, and hypocrisy on calling others out on the first two counts while you yourself are guilty of them. Note that none of these things are PL reasons, none of them go into your intentionally acting in an anti-town manner, and none of the deal with only a single petty or small incident. Note that counts were done at 12 am, and are only correct within a 10% margin or error
