In post 962, Brian Skies wrote:374: HGH played brilliantly? In what aspect? He made seriously scummy moves. You say it's obvtown. I don't see how it's any different from a scum player making the same mistakes. I'm also not even reading this slot (in case you remember, I did say HGH looked like lost town). Your biggest defense of his play was that he had "big balls". I'm just not buying that. It looks like a terrible reason to make your predecessor look better. It's a red flag.
Yes. What scummy moves? HGH = Obvtown yes. What mistakes? You're not reading this slot, hmm (I thought you said he made seriously scummy moves, how the fuck does that equate to lost town?). You're high, I said for him to be scum he'd have to be big balled scum. Go read. The rest is irrelevant because the premise is wrong.
In post 962, Brian Skies wrote:
376: The over-quantified argument? I already explained this. I was doing this so DJ could respond to me more easily. Also, you never even bring up this argument against Wake when he does it.
You did it to make your vote look more legitimate.
In post 962, Brian Skies wrote:
397: You politely ask Titus a question, but it looks like you're actually looking for a specific response. You then go on to accuse Titus of being a townread forger. Really? It feels like reaching. Also, your interaction with the mod is out-of-place, can be faked, and raises another red flag for me.
More polite questioning that includes asking for RainbowPony's reads without giving your own. You ask questions but you lack analysis. Then you go on to say we should check RBP's meta for loyalty? I understand it's a joke, but you could be more serious in your scumhunting.
I still think it was faked, the setup was really rather clear about that. So if you think my interaction with the mod was faked, which it was.. surprise!, how come you are vehemently against the idea of Titus faking his SK-related ignorance? You are calling me out on mine (ignorance) at a time when I am the second largest wagon, this is fucking hypocritical at best.
About my questions, you're not even the first to come up with calling them bad. They're awesome, and loyalty could be RD's flaw with regard to her defending Skull and Wake.
In post 962, Brian Skies wrote:
530: If you know what the case is, then why not defend against it? The best you can do is an OMGUS? Really?
Did I say case? No. I said I know what this is. To me her attack seemed like she wanted to be the only player with a plant profile picture. "There can be only one" = SK mentality. Didn't feel the need to pursue this line of thought though. Me accusing Mae of sampling RD's words and turning it into an accusation didn't lead anywhere either but not because it didn't have potential to be scummy, but because I figured she didn't know what she was doing judging from
654.
In post 962, Brian Skies wrote:
568: You're providing information to clear something up. But there's no analysis.
You go on to make more polite questioning posts without providing any content. It looks bad. And anything that even remotely looks like scumhunting seems feigned to me.
I don't understand what you're talking about. Polite questioning, you mean the "panic much?" comment at the end? That's the analysis. The thing I was accusing Mae of was panic in light of the fact that she saw her scummy rolePM and didn't know how to make a good entrance so she took the post that RD made about her and turned it into an accusation that I wasn't being prominent enough to be noticed. The shattered way in which you ricochet this back to me now is mindboggling.
She didn't do any of the scummy things I enumerated.
In post 962, Brian Skies wrote:
I could make a pbp analysis for anybody and make them look just as bad. But I'm not a Day 1 player and I can just as easily be wrong. But these are the reasons I think you're scummy. Plus, I have a strong townread on Maenara right now and I'm willing to shamelessly sheep her as long as she provides good reasoning. And no, your posting has not gotten any townier for me.
I read this as active-, and Sven's most recent post as passive resistance for the BP wagon, which is good.
VOTE: BP
