Open 529 -- Picking Simplicity -- Game Over

[Svenskt Stål]

I HEREBY WANT TO STATE THAT I AM MORE THAN WILLING TO LYNCH APTIL AND THAT WE STILL HAVE TIME

[Titus]

No we do not. You would need about 10 for that wagon. Shut up. BP must be the lynch today.

If I die look closer at Stal, Brian Skies and jmo.

[Albert B. Rampage]

We have time.

Vote Aptil

[Albert B. Rampage]

When reading, I was mostly suspicious of Aeronaut. Aptil or Wake are acceptable lynches. Why BP?

[Svenskt Stål]

I dont know, mae is at the helm, read her wall.

[Albert B. Rampage]

I read it, I wasn't compelled to vote for him.

[Titus]

Rampage, with this player base we do not. We have less than two days.

As for BoroPhil, look at his read wall in 786. He takes the position that Stal is town but maybe not. Then Stal is not in his scum list. The wall takes no hard position but gets him to a jmo vote. His ISO is full of questions and not many strong positions. He is not my favorite lynch but I am not getting a Wake lynch.

[Wake1]

I don't trust the wagon on BP, but you guys go ahead and do what you want.

[Titus]

Why don't you? I have seen a lot of "this wagon is bad" but no reasoning why.

[Svenskt Stål]

I am hereby grouping wake with titus for the remaining game.

[don_johnson]

mod: can we get a vote count?

I would be ok with a wake or aptil quick wagon here at the end of the day. both of their last posts are scummy as hell.

vote: aptil

i'll be around this morning if needs be to switch.

[Wake1]

To get an 11-vote lynch in a 20-player game, it's going to require Scum to manipulate Townies into voting with them. I'm certain at least two Scum are on the BP wagon, and maybe more. There is probably one or two mafioso hanging back to keep distance.

I've seen no compelling reason why BP deserves a lynch, and no likelihood of people taking responsibility if their wagon is wrong.

[Svenskt Stål]

VOTE: Vote aptil

[aptil]

To get an 11-vote lynch in a 20-player game, it's going to require Scum to manipulate Townies into voting with them.

I'm certain at least two Scum are on the BP wagon, and maybe more. There is probably one or two mafioso hanging back to keep distance.

I've seen no compelling reason why BP deserves a lynch, and no likelihood of people taking responsibility if their wagon is wrong.

Look look it is happening .

[don_johnson]

wake: then who is scum?

[Loranthaceae]

To get an 11-vote lynch in a 20-player game, it's going to require Scum to manipulate Townies into voting with them. I'm certain at least two Scum are on the BP wagon, and maybe more. There is probably one or two mafioso hanging back to keep distance.

I've seen no compelling reason why BP deserves a lynch, and no likelihood of people taking responsibility if their wagon is wrong.

wake: then who is scum?

[Svenskt Stål]

lpran, go aptil?

[jmo16mla]

@jmo: you have been around the whole game and yet your posts have not been more than 1 line . That play style is really weird .VOTE: JMO

It's not because I've done scummy things though? Hm.

I'm actually beginning to question others and get into this game. Thanks.

[Wake1]

Don, don't ask dishonest questions. Noted.

I said there's undoubtedly two Scum on the BP wagon. Both you and I know, however, that I'm not psychic, nor do I know who exactly they are.

[Svenskt Stål]

wake, go for aptil, over

[Titus]

I still dont agree on borophil but I dont have the stregth to make a large wall and i fear time is against me aswell. Making 10 players trust me and vote with me seems futile.


VOTE: borophil

How do you get from this to there is plenty of time?

Answer, it is not logical. Stal is trying to prevent his scumbuddy from being lynched.

[Svenskt Stål]

you should post less

[Titus]

Again. Not a response. Your posts are illogical and your rationale is telling me to shut up. We didn't gain time between 943 and 1025. If you want me to rethink, give me a reason to.

[Wake1]

wake, go for aptil, over

Why?

[don_johnson]

Don, don't ask dishonest questions. Noted.

I said there's undoubtedly two Scum on the BP wagon. Both you and I know, however, that I'm not psychic, nor do I know who exactly they are.

how is that a "dishonest" question? i'm asking you who you think is scum. saying "there's at least two scum on the wagon" is a pretty frivolous statement in a 20p game. you infer too much here. the question was pretty simple. and you dodged it. here's some more questions: are there two scum on the wagon regardless of BP's alignment? if he flips scum, who do you think is scum? if he flips town, who do you think is scum? no one expects you to be psychic, but asking you to explain your rationale is not a "dishonest" inquiry. what you just said is equivalent to someone saying "well, there's four scum out there somewhere."

unvote, vote: wake

for capping off a day of useless drivel with even more useless drivel. wake wagon is a go.