![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Interesting choice to be made, is Sleepy for Grounded definite?
Bitching and pointing out everyones faulty logic are two different things, HOWEVER, i never said in my recent posts i want it, only that i don't want Kitty taking it.In post 316, pickemgenius wrote:bbm should be for cannot be tempted cause his train of thought is pure and I don't want to reward someone bitching like a million times about themselves not getting anything. It's like rewarding a kid who wants candy at one store then you go to another store and he wants MORE FUCKING CANDY. And that motherfucker will cause a scene too BOTH PLACES. That little shit dont give a fuck.
so yeah.
dont reward that behavior.
thanks!
Dude if the Temptation is an excemption for every quiz or $5000 for the group i will take it, i'm not going to lie that there is a chance that i will take it, BUT YOU DIDN'T READ THE REST OF WHAT I SAID YOU FUCKING MORONIn post 318, Blackberry wrote:In post 285, JasonWazza wrote:Look i never took the jokers, even when there was 4 on offer, i merely said that 4 joker part as a test to flush out the mole.
Depending on the temptation i might take it, that is always a possiblity, if it is great enough temptation, but on the flip side, a high enough reward for the group and i'm likely to take that.
This early in the game i'd weigh to me not taking a temptation.
P-Edit: I will also add, i think it's terrible only 1 was returned.I found scum.In post 309, JasonWazza wrote:The people who took none, have BALLS, cause they know they can beat this game without some pathetic helps, the fact that you guys took some shows you can't win this game without some sort of help in your own minds, hence why i think when it's quite likely an exception will be up on offer, i am totally against people who took jokers in general, and definitely against Kitty getting it.
That's not polite. I defended you earlier and called you non-stupid.In post 326, JasonWazza wrote:Bitching and pointing out everyones faulty logic are two different things, HOWEVER, i never said in my recent posts i want it, only that i don't want Kitty taking it.In post 316, pickemgenius wrote:bbm should be for cannot be tempted cause his train of thought is pure and I don't want to reward someone bitching like a million times about themselves not getting anything. It's like rewarding a kid who wants candy at one store then you go to another store and he wants MORE FUCKING CANDY. And that motherfucker will cause a scene too BOTH PLACES. That little shit dont give a fuck.
so yeah.
dont reward that behavior.
thanks!
Dude if the Temptation is an excemption for every quiz or $5000 for the group i will take it, i'm not going to lie that there is a chance that i will take it, BUT YOU DIDN'T READ THE REST OF WHAT I SAID YOU FUCKING MORONIn post 318, Blackberry wrote:In post 285, JasonWazza wrote:Look i never took the jokers, even when there was 4 on offer, i merely said that 4 joker part as a test to flush out the mole.
Depending on the temptation i might take it, that is always a possiblity, if it is great enough temptation, but on the flip side, a high enough reward for the group and i'm likely to take that.
This early in the game i'd weigh to me not taking a temptation.
P-Edit: I will also add, i think it's terrible only 1 was returned.I found scum.In post 309, JasonWazza wrote:The people who took none, have BALLS, cause they know they can beat this game without some pathetic helps, the fact that you guys took some shows you can't win this game without some sort of help in your own minds, hence why i think when it's quite likely an exception will be up on offer, i am totally against people who took jokers in general, and definitely against Kitty getting it.
In post 47, Faraday wrote:Flameaxe is BBM.
That never makes sense unless i'm directly staring at his avatar, and he doesn't post enough for that to even happen.
Hi i'm Jason the person who is always raging, nice to meet you.In post 336, SleepyKrew wrote:Also Jason srsly calm down
Sickest of bruns.In post 337, JasonWazza wrote:That never makes sense unless i'm directly staring at his avatar, and he doesn't post enough for that to even happen.
Hi i'm Jason the person who is always raging, nice to meet you.In post 336, SleepyKrew wrote:Also Jason srsly calm down
No.In post 348, Blackberry wrote:It's basically a giant puzzle Jal. Are we allowed to talk publicaly or not? The rules don't indicate either way.