The argument on Thor from what I seen was that he is handpicking lynches to push rather than pushing people and seeing what reaction he gets out of them.(the player)
And I can see where that's coming from.
With GG, SB and slandaar he was treating them like 'open and shut' cases too much,(look at post
#18 for example)
That was why I went along and voted when I did. (plus ABR just generally came across as knowing what he was talking about)
He seems to say he done this in the recent newbie game (I assume #1435) but upon overlooking it, he did'nt. So the meta defence is'nt valid.
Thor moving the goalposts and claiming people are attacking him
because he is playing to a different meta than he usually does
, does'nt endear him to me further.
Neither did his accusation of ABR chainsaw defending Slandaar.
And I don't think Thor gave a satisfactory answer to one of the central questions of the issue: Why was he not interested in hearing input from the three lurker players before ending the day.(by lynching Slandaar)