![Image](http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/6160/tippingatfancyrestuarangr4.gif)
Deadline is in
Go back and read it. You'll realize that I pointed out thatF-16 wrote: I find meta to be a very useful tool and IceNinja's dismissal of Thor's case based on the fact that he is referring to his meta to be a poor argument.
You're clearly clueless.F-16 wrote: Also he wants to do a VCA but declines to put his vote down?
I think VCA's are useless but IceNinja clearly thinks that they are useful. With a player who has that mindset, I'd expect him to put down a vote so it becomes easier to VCA him. He is working against what he seems to think is a useful scumhunting method.
In post 346, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Thor, my case on you is made up. The reason I made it up is because I wanted to teach you that if you go against me, this is what will come of it. It's not wise for you to go against me. I'm stronger. I scumhunt better. I get who I want lynched more often than you do. Remember that. Tell your QT buddies if you're scum.
By distraction I mean exactly that - he is a distraction.In post 359, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:By "distraction," I assume you read him as town. If so, why? None of the things you have mentioned read as town to me.
Sure.In post 359, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I am unsure about Albert and here's why: You and him are two most experienced players in this game.
Sure.In post 359, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:If he is scum and you town, you are his one biggest threat and possibly his only fear.
I can think of quite a few.In post 359, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I don't see the scum motivation in initiating an attack on you and putting himself in the spotlight when he can just as easily push on one of the weaker players in the game and safely nightkill you.
I think that is pretty blatantly not what happened here.In post 359, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I can see him possibly pushing for your mislynch based on the "thrill of mislynching Thor" which would be the kind of mindset I would ascribe to someone with his personality - although that wouldn't be optimal for his wincon.
Yeah, because him being called out by me for advancing a total gak case, and then realizing I was probably going to get people to notice and backpedaling away from it like a burnt dog while *still* indicating potential to scum read me even at that instant is total town play.In post 359, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I need more time to figure him out.
If you were scum, you would still push him and refute his case, wouldn't you? That doesn't make you obvtown from his POV.In post 361, Thor665 wrote:Here's the ABR scum case in a nutshell for you not noticing this.
1. He presents a scum case on me.
2. I call him bad and the case worse and provide evidence of such.
3. He reiterates the strength of the case.
4. I call him scummy for how he's pushing it and vote him.
5. He reiterates the value of his case.
6. I call him and everyone who looks like him terrible and still point out the holes.
7. He admits he was making up the whole thing.
8. He still suggests I'm scum.
Hint: #7 and #8 actually don't make sense when added together...y'know, considering he made up the case on me! So, y'know, what have I done at that point to look scummy? Oh, right, I called him a liar and said he should be lynched...which should tell him that MY READS ARE GOOD. Instead he's all like, lulz, just "showin' ya"
Anyone who doesn't comment on that I'll just presume is his scumbuddy.
from your post 360.I can think of quite a few.
At that point, what do you think he was doing?In post 364, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:If you were scum, you would still push him and refute his case, wouldn't you? That doesn't make you obvtown from his POV.
Not Town; no stance on the issue and it clearly comes from scum seeing town who made up a case. Think about it another way; Anyone who is town react remotely similar? nope and noone will all you have to do is think about how you reacted when you read it. And the reason for the difference is we don't know ABR's alignment although ICE has now given it away.In post 351, ICEninja wrote:LOL Albert you crack me up.
Because it didn't; the question didn't make sense to ask.In post 333, toolenduso wrote: You responded to the part of the sentence I wasn't questioning. What I was asking was, why did you say it doesn't it feel right?
You are not applying context which I told you previously.In post 333, toolenduso wrote: Could you please explain what I missed in your pasts instead of just saying I missed something?