In post 16, Venrob wrote:VOTE: YKV
For reasons.
Also fucking hell I REALLY WANTED TO BE MAF IN THIS SETUP!!!
This WIFOM hurts my face. But it's early at this point.
In post 96, Venrob wrote:Also; check my meta. I hate day 1. I hate it. I like having dead people; it gives info. Analysis. Until something really jumps out at me on day 1, I'm stuck with nothing; and hook onto even the littlest thing, such as bald saying "serious vote".
I think the "serious vote" thing is something, but it's not much. I also think this post is null, but I thought it was scummy when I first read it.
In post 112, YellowKingValley wrote:
I'm
, you actually stood by what you said before?
VOTE: NicCage
For:
1) interfering in a reaction test (to warn scum buddies): scum motivated
2) preventing me from initiating discussion (while at the same time calling RVS butts): scum motivated
First of all, there was no recognizable reaction test, so positing that he was attempting to interfere with it is quite a stretch. Secondly, if anyone has prevented discussion, it's you. However, calling RVS "butts" is a scum tell now? lol....
In post 119, Hermy wrote:I know I've got a while until a prod, but I feel like dodging it now
I don't think I have anything useful to say, that hasn't been said by somebody already.
Prod dodge 1.
In post 131, Hermy wrote:I'm on my iPod and therefore can't do all my reads in a single post without losing what I write at least five times. And anyway, I feel like quoting stuff.
In post 19, NicCage wrote: In post 15, Banakai wrote:VOTE: NicCage
If your talking about not voting, you did the same thing
If your talking about "You will
tonight" then learn to take a joke
No I'm not talking about not voting.
This is a shitty bw vote pretending not to be one.
Do you feel like I've overreacted to what he said? All I did was comment that it was gross.
VOTE: banaki
Nice OMGUS there...
In post 126, NicCage wrote: In post 118, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Actually, screwing up a reaction test can be a scumtell because normally, a townie would just let test continue without going 'OH MY GOD, GUYS WATCH OUT, THIS IS A TEST!!!' Usually, I can tell somethings are reaction tests, but I don't say anything.
Goddamn dude, really?
So you're not even going to defend yourself? Just a 'Damn dude, really?'. Every time I've heard somebody say 'really?' they and up being scum. What's so surprising about that post? It's perfectly correct.
What reaction test? And its a fucking null tell at best. Town screw up reaction tests all the time in their zeal to catch scum in a lie.
In post 132, Hermy wrote:Egg is null. I refuse to put anything other than null for anybody who hasn't posted at least eight times in this thread.
Therefore, all the others who haven't posted much are null too.
This is the most bullshit cop out I have ever read in my life. "I refuse to say anything about anyone who hasn't posted this many posts". Content is everything, my dear. And yours sucks.
In post 136, Hermy wrote:
Hm. Reaction test, real IC (if we have one) or scum rolefishing?
In post 42, notscience wrote:Here's a fun question-
If you were scum, which 3 roles would you pick for town to have and why?
Because I feel like answering...
Probably:
2-Shot Vig - There is an extremely tiny chance that they'll hit scum on both goes. Providing they don't die too quickly, they can take out an extra townie or two for the mafia. Of course, it does come with the additional risk of killing a mafia member in the right hands, but it's a risk that I'd be willing to take.
1-Shot cop - The chances of getting scum are pretty small. You'll also have to get the town to believe you. You also have to make a good investigation and announce the results before you die.
Tracker - There are three people to choose from, when it comes to picking who should kill. The odds of the tracker tracking that person would be pretty small. They could also track the vig and possibly get them lynched. Or the cop, if the cop happens to be (extremely) unlucky.
Reasons for roles I wouldn't choose:
IC - If the scum didn't get this person before LyLo then that sucks. And anyway, it's not exactly a very useful p
Jailer - I'd find this way too powerful. They could stop a kill be either blocking somebody they find suspicious, OR going and jailing somebody who they think of as innocent. They COULD stop a vig-kill or a cop but the chances are rather small.
In post 55, notscience wrote:Here's another question-
When forced to claim, do you claim something you know is in the game to out the PR (tracker or JK) or do you claim those not in the game?
Hmm. I'd say probably those not in the game, as that would possibly lead to most roles outing to find a possible liar. Though, on the other hand, there is more of an outing chance when claiming the one in the game. There is also the risk of a lynch, but if you out the jailer then at night your scumbuddies could kill a good power role (of course, the logical thong would be to not claim jailer in the first
I don't remember why I quoted this. It will come to me later I'm sure.
In post 140, Hermy wrote: In post 16, Venrob wrote:VOTE: YKV
For reasons.
Also fucking hell I REALLY WANTED TO BE MAF IN THIS SETUP!!!
Really? You're just going to say that? That sounds fairly scummy.
In post 40, Venrob wrote:In post 28 i was asked what reasons.
Also ppl who say "serious vote" are always scumz!
Somebody is
definitely
scum because of what they said?
Yeah, that's totally what Venrob implied.
It is clearly not that serious.
In post 141, Hermy wrote: In post 118, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Actually, screwing up a reaction test can be a scumtell because normally, a townie would just let test continue without going 'OH MY GOD, GUYS WATCH OUT, THIS IS A TEST!!!' Usually, I can tell somethings are reaction tests, but I don't say anything.
Not sure whether I mention this before, but good point.
In post 120, 1baldeagle1 wrote: In post 119, Hermy wrote:I know I've got a while until a prod, but I feel like dodging it now
I don't think I have anything useful to say, that hasn't been said by somebody already.
Nononononononononononononononononononononononononnono.
You can't do this, you need to post your thoughts and your reads and vote for whoever you think is scum. You can't just sit there silently and do nothing.
To be honest, you do have a point.
BE, in general, seems like town at the moment.
Yeah. Cuz baldeagle comes off so towny. lol.. Any self-respecting scum hunter would and should have been on top of BE. He's the newbiest newb that ever newbed and always looks scummy. Except I've seen him as scum, so I know this isn't it. I don't think you have, so I don't think you do. Which only leads me to believe that you are "town reading" him because you already know he is town. If you're having trouble wrapping your mind around this, it's probably because you got a red role pm.
In post 146, beastcharizard wrote: In post 136, Hermy wrote:
Hm. Reaction test, real IC (if we have one) or scum rolefishing?
In post 42, notscience wrote:Here's a fun question-
If you were scum, which 3 roles would you pick for town to have and why?
Because I feel like answering...
Probably:
2-Shot Vig - There is an extremely tiny chance that they'll hit scum on both goes. Providing they don't die too quickly, they can take out an extra townie or two for the mafia. Of course, it does come with the additional risk of killing a mafia member in the right hands, but it's a risk that I'd be willing to take.
1-Shot cop - The chances of getting scum are pretty small. You'll also have to get the town to believe you. You also have to make a good investigation and announce the results before you die.
Tracker - There are three people to choose from, when it comes to picking who should kill. The odds of the tracker tracking that person would be pretty small. They could also track the vig and possibly get them lynched. Or the cop, if the cop happens to be (extremely) unlucky.
Reasons for roles I wouldn't choose:
IC - If the scum didn't get this person before LyLo then that sucks. And anyway, it's not exactly a very useful p
Jailer - I'd find this way too powerful. They could stop a kill be either blocking somebody they find suspicious, OR going and jailing somebody who they think of as innocent. They COULD stop a vig-kill or a cop but the chances are rather small.
In post 55, notscience wrote:Here's another question-
When forced to claim, do you claim something you know is in the game to out the PR (tracker or JK) or do you claim those not in the game?
Hmm. I'd say probably those not in the game, as that would possibly lead to most roles outing to find a possible liar. Though, on the other hand, there is more of an outing chance when claiming the one in the game. There is also the risk of a lynch, but if you out the jailer then at night your scumbuddies could kill a good power role (of course, the logical thong would be to not claim jailer in the first
to the bold part:
What?! The scum already know the roles the town has so why the heck would they need to fish to find out which one the village has?
You are trying to set up a lynch on ns.
What about the other person who claimed IC? Why not mention them? Are they your scum scum buddy and you don't want to bus them?
VOTE: Hermy
@eagle:
Can you elaborate more please? I am very interested in what you are saying.
I agree 100% with the bolded.
In post 160, Hot Cheetos wrote:
I hated his counterclaim and subsequent role-fishing.
Yes. Now identify this head.
In post 152, YellowKingValley wrote:When should our 1-shot
use his/her night action?
Immediately before they die so that their ability is not wasted? Which means N1.
Or wait until there are clearer scum suspects? Which means N3.
All limited power roles should use their power immediately.
The scumread on notscience surprises me.
YKV asking about when PRs should use their action and HC saying immediately is also pretty scummy. "Yes, get your actions out of the way early when you have no idea what's going on so that by the time you do, you can't." This also tells me the scum team chose the limited shot roles specifically in the hopes of directing this kind of activity.
In post 200, YellowKingValley wrote:
Don't make me
.
Two "lynches" better than one. Faster scumhunting.
1-shot Cop revealing D2 is great strategy. No use bringing his results to the grave.
"Yes, out the cop as soon as possible so we can have a kill that gives no other information."
In post 251, mnemonicdevice wrote:Nic is just weird, sarcastic town.
I like my vote on beast thanks though.
YKV is town, but i think his emoticons make him seem scummy to people.
Yay. This game is awesome.
What a useless fucking post. Wow. Up to this point, YKV has been nothing BUT scummy as all hell.
In post 256, 1baldeagle1 wrote:
So, if you never saw it before, then how do you know it's scummy?
In post 255, BK201 wrote:Well I'm back, it seems nothing has happened during 3 pages. Too tired and unfortunately too busy to dig any deeper than that atm. I'll be back tomorrow.
Hi. What's your read on Nic?
Uh... I forgot why I quoted this one too.
In post 258, YellowKingValley wrote:Dear all,
beastcharizard, BK201, NicCage need to post more content. Lazy town or blending scum.
YES YES YES need to interact more with others. Huge post is good but insufficient.
Banakai is half-half for both. Activity dropped.
The rest are fine for now.
With Love,
~The Mayor~
P.S. Thieving scums should admit now and save everyone the trouble. Else face
.
Wow. Beast was posting, BK said he was busy, Nic was posting. YES said he was sick. Nice, easy policy lynches, eh, YKV?
In post 262, YellowKingValley wrote:I thought both heads are sick or something? Anyway for those on V/LA, can compromise. But if they plan to V/LA for too long...
Policy lynch hardlurkers.
Nearly two-third of his posts are either (1) single sentence fluff, or (2) more "content" but lacked thought - like accusation on Hermy's.
I don't want to get NKed. mnemonicdevice noticed what I'm trying to do...
Oh look. Such predictable scum, you are. Policy lynching is about as far from town motivated as you can get and allows scum to get a lynch for free without giving any real reasons or evidence. I am astounded by your scumminess.
In post 271, mnemonicdevice wrote:I am still here. Nothing much happening. To make this game more interesting: everyone tell me what their favorite animal is. Wrong answers will be voted.
What the shit. Nothing much happening? I've found enough to make some comments, you could have too. But you don't. Because you're scum. Fucking usless. "What's your favorite animal? hurrdurr.." Lynch this shit now.
In post 321, Hermy wrote:
Ugh. Twelve posts. Only. And... ugh. Fencesitting.
VOTE: Banakai
HAHAHAHAHAHA. HAHAHA. HA. Ohhh. scum posting at it's finest. Good reason for a vote too. /sarcasm.
HC is unknown. NicCage... I was pretty sure he was town until the last page or two ofthe game. More on that below. notscience is very clearly town.
In post 335, YellowKingValley wrote:
Because he is lying and he is not Cop! He is planning to keep his "results" to save his scum buddy when needed!
Interesting.
In post 348, YellowKingValley wrote:The "calling each other town and buddy together" strategy you discussed yesterday night is so obvious.
Just my read is off LOL. No explanation given.
Translation: "This town bloc is going to catch me. I need to stop it right away."
Nail head. You hit it.
In post 355, YellowKingValley wrote:
This awkward post totally out of the blue is to disassociate yourself from Hot Cheetos, claiming that you don't know each other.
If you know Hot Cheetos is a hydra, you will definitely know their identities. If not, suddenly suspecting someone as a hydra out of nowhere is a red flag. Means that you knew each other before.
This so beyond a stretch it's on fucking mars.
In post 367, YES YES YES wrote:V/LA til the 26th
Will have access 23-24 but. Im unsure of all the other dates
DP is busy. DB is sick..
Who are these people - Doctor Pepper and Daniel Bryan????
In post 391, NicCage wrote:It wasn't BE lol.
I was thinking maybe everyone should talk a little before I said it but I changed my mind
YKV is innocent
WTF. This is so fucking convenient. Also, why are you alive? That's interesting too. What a newb play this is, my god.
In post 395, Hermy wrote:I did have a feeling that YKV was town, but nevertheless, seems like a decent person to investigate. So that's good.
Uh.. what? You thought he was town so you investigated him? Ummm... I'm gonna call BULLSHIT.
In post 403, Egg wrote:Has anyone actually said why hot cheetos is scum yet?
No. They haven't. It's a bad wagon. Don't follow it.
. Team NicCage, Hot Cheetos and notscience.