I thought Brian's claim was bad, but it did clear you however. And maybe Ank if there's a kill tonight.In post 679, InflatablePie wrote:there's also probably a scum in [Aldusk/Hiraki/DE] given that all of those votes had... not much or any reasons really, just piled on after the tracker claim.
this supports Sakura's logic, even if that's on the basis of her assuming Ank is scum first. not sure if that means I'm on the right track or terribly off-base again.
Hm? Why? I'm getting town vibes from him.
Given up after one vote? I think it's one vote.In post 714, Alduskkel wrote:I think this is "scum NS who has given up and is just fucking around."
I like this.In post 741, InflatablePie wrote:Yeah, we keep Ank alive at least for one day. If there's another no kill, we maybe lynch him tomorrow. If there is a kill, we have at least two confirmed town.
Currently I'm thinking Ank scum and Jacob traitor, but I'd like to go after the most likely scum besides them.
QFT.In post 742, DoctorEagle wrote:VOTE: Hiraki
Sure, lets go kill the conf town roleblocker. Logic.
If we aren't lynching Ank for the horrendous "scum did a no kill gambit" statement today, then we must do it tomorrow.
DP
Why?In post 744, Alduskkel wrote:I don't like how/that JS and DE are on the Hiraki wagon.
Newbie 1436.In post 767, Alduskkel wrote:I mean seriously, DE isn't scum because he's TOO closely associated with ETL? That's basically "too scummy to be scum" right there. And NS isn't stupid, he's not going to blow up just because he made a mistake.
In post 752, Hiraki wrote:And when I admitted that I made a mistake, did that have an effect on your vote or did you casually ignore it the second time?
Hiraki has been going with the flow this whole game, and there's really no push from his votes. He's just coasting.In post 754, Alduskkel wrote:@DE: Why? Well, JS's vote is OBVIOUSLY terrible. Yours is also terrible because your reason is shit. (And it's on you to prove that it isn't shit.)
Also, I want to hear why you think Hiraki-scum bussed ETL like that.
I don't want to say I'm townreading Hiraki but man are the players going after him scummy (except Sakura).
True, I don't really have a problem with lynching Ank. If he flips town, I'm looking at Ald and Hiraki. Maybe JS. I have a gut scumread on Ald and JSIn post 763, InflatablePie wrote:I mean, wecanlynch Ank, I just think that in case I'm wrong again we take a lot less damage from lynching through other people.
8 alive, let's say we lynch... Aldusk or someone, go to 7. Scum miss a kill again tonight. This means they either want to frame Ank, or Ank is scum. This is LYLO as well, since if we ML and I block wrong, it's game over. They won't even kill Ank tonight since that confirms him as town, it'd be easier to no-kill and have only one confirmed town in probably-LYLO. So this plan only works if Ank is scum, if he's town it's kinda useless.
... I kind of think lynching Ank is the right move now actually.
... Also, I'd like to bring up, again, that since scum probably lack a rolecop/BP/did not recruit traitor (evidenced by no-kill + ETL slipping by saying "scum 'partner' "), Jacob is only town if scum decided to pick daytalk. Which with two people seems like a not great upgrade. And the correct play after ETL was lynched would be to take out the 'confirmed' Bodyguard, which apparently scum hit traitor...
k, I'm really really leaning towards this crazy scumteam idea.
vote Ankamius
fuck it, if he's town we can just figure this out tomorrow.
[pedit] see vote.
Whoops forgot to respond to this comment in my last post.In post 752, Hiraki wrote:And when I admitted that I made a mistake, did that have an effect on your vote or did you casually ignore it the second time?
So they randomly no-killed N2 after ETL was lynched?In post 770, Alduskkel wrote:IP, they might have also recruited the Traitor, which would have given them grounds to immediately kill Bert.
