Open 529 -- Picking Simplicity -- Game Over

don_johnson · Post Post #2025 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:34 am

in iso, antihero has some weird early interactions with both flipped scum. votes BP with zero reasoning seemingly piggybacking RBD's case. kind of odd.

in iso, titus is early sk hunting, with soft defense of antihero. "I am willing to switch to BP to get a lynch off. His behavior is off." - not much before this i can see when skimming. vote comes a bit later in defense of BP's attack on RBD? meh. titus also asks sven and myself for opinions on BP. maybe trying to set up connections that aren't there. tius leaves the scum wagon to try and push sven. moves back to the scum wagon later, calling the cop scum.

aptil · Post Post #2026 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:38 am

I think maenera should be the lynch today.

don_johnson · Post Post #2027 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:47 am

why maenara?

I have to go to work, so i'll try and get back later tonight or tomorrow AM.

antihero: thoughts please...

Svenskt Stål · Post Post #2028 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:54 am

In post 2026, aptil wrote:I think maenera should be the lynch today.

this is so fuckingballsy and wierd that you either aint reading the thread, or you aint scum.

Brian Skies · Post Post #2029 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:49 pm

Okay, so, I would love to give you guys content, but you guys gotta give me a chance before you lock the thread on me. I don't have time to read through the thread right now. Based on what Don said recently about Skull (which I need to check), I think I may have been wrong about him (this was where I was actually going towards before RBP hammered). He can only logically be the SK or town, otherwise Skull would have died Night 1.

I like thorough reads. I like basing my reads off of flips. If you want content from me, don't lock the goddamn thread before I dish it out.

Rainbowdash · Post Post #2030 (ISO) » Sun Nov 03, 2013 3:13 pm

don_johnson wrote:RBD: care to rehash your maenarascum theory or is that dead?

They are on a shortlist. I still think they are an above average scum pick.

My last list still hold about the same.

Nobody Special · Post Post #2031 (ISO) » Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:36 pm

Votecount 4.02

aptil - 2 - Svenskt Stål, Loranthaceae
don_johnson - 2 - Titus, uctriton00
uctriton00 - 1 - Maenara

Not Voting: aptil, Brian Skies, don_johnson, JacobSavage, Rainbowdash, Antihero, jmo16mla

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2013-11-22 23:52:38)

don_johnson · Post Post #2032 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:12 am

titus: it should be painfully obvious I am not scum. please give us some thoughts on other players.

rbd: what are your thoughts on titus?

more input would be great from everyone. dead game is dead.

jmo16mla · Post Post #2033 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:47 am

Something of substance coming later.

Loranthaceae · Post Post #2034 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:16 am

People need to get in here and vote for someone other than RD, Sven and don

JacobSavage · Post Post #2035 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:24 am

VOTE: jmo

Maenara · Post Post #2036 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:42 am

In post 2017, don_johnson wrote:
Maenara wrote: DJ's attack on Titus is atrocious; her defense of RachMarie at a positively hopeless time is rather unlikely to come from scum with the current meta.
can you explain this? what are you referring to with "the current meta"? I was right about rm. titus ignored it based on rl issues, and not only that, but gave her a town read. I see that as a pretty concrete connection to flipped scum that really shouldn't be ignored.

Current meta is that scum busses way too much, so whoever defends town in a blatant matter like that is, more often than not, town.

I'm not saying I agree with Titus' evaluation of RachMarie - obviously, and particularly not in hindsight - but I don't see any scum motivation behind it, particularly not given that she was, at the time, at risk of a guilty.

jmo16mla · Post Post #2037 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:40 pm

In post 2035, JacobSavage wrote:VOTE: jmo

no.

jmo16mla · Post Post #2038 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:09 pm

Okay, I'm going to need everyone to name two people you think are scum.

One for SK..

ready. go.

Rainbowdash · Post Post #2039 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:49 pm

In post 2038, jmo16mla wrote:Okay, I'm going to need everyone to name two people you think are scum.

One for SK..

ready. go.

no

Vote utc

Explaination incoming, but BP and him played very touch and go type game where they poked at each other but never really attacked. RM and him basically ignored each other. Im liking the vote more than the Titus one, although I would be quite happy to end with a dead DJ today as well.

jmo16mla · Post Post #2040 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:50 pm

uctriton00 · Post Post #2041 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:20 pm

Why can't we vote don Johnson?

And wtf rainbow, pretty sure that the only people I touched were wake and skull and DJ so does that mean I'm scum and have 14 scum partners?

uctriton00 · Post Post #2042 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:24 pm

If you want to use that logic then put it to Aptil who has his the entire game, sans a Sven shove. If we give Sven and Aptil the same treatment Rach and Savage had, then ill gladly go Aptil to get you off my back and to satisfy Sven's theory.

uctriton00 · Post Post #2043 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:25 pm

First line was Aptil "who has hid"

Maenara · Post Post #2044 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:41 pm

In post 2041, uctriton00 wrote:And wtf rainbow, pretty sure that the only people I touched were wake and skull and DJ so does that mean I'm scum and have 14 scum partners?

No, that means you're really lazy scum.

don_johnson · Post Post #2045 (ISO) » Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:31 am

uct: please pay attention. I am clearly not scum.

maenara: titus' defense of RM was going on for a long time, not just when she was at risk of a guilty. plus, while defending under risk of a guilty, titus creates the situation you are locking into. but whatevz.

vote: brianskies

do something. anything.

Loranthaceae · Post Post #2046 (ISO) » Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:41 am

In post 2041, uctriton00 wrote:Why can't we vote don Johnson?

Because his story seems legit. Why won't you buy it?

Titus · Post Post #2047 (ISO) » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:10 am

In post 2025, don_johnson wrote:in iso, antihero has some weird early interactions with both flipped scum. votes BP with zero reasoning seemingly piggybacking RBD's case. kind of odd.

in iso, titus is early sk hunting, with soft defense of antihero. "I am willing to switch to BP to get a lynch off. His behavior is off." - not much before this i can see when skimming. vote comes a bit later in defense of BP's attack on RBD? meh. titus also asks sven and myself for opinions on BP. maybe trying to set up connections that aren't there. tius leaves the scum wagon to try and push sven. moves back to the scum wagon later, calling the cop scum.

Uhh another misrep here. I never said Loran was scum. I believed Liran was gambiting.

Will catch up tonight.

don_johnson · Post Post #2048 (ISO) » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:53 am

titus wrote:Sven, the reason for aptil is why it looks like Don has a point. Even then, your biggest King of the World target is a lurker. Your posts seem to have the goal of not antagonizing. The one person you should want to lynch is a scum read someone you'd want to have information on. For instance, mine would be Wake because I think he's the SK if I'm in a self-centric mood.
If I was feeling more community minded, I'd probably do BoroPhil or Loran.
Yours seem to be self-centered with no real evidence to back them up.

yup.

maenara: if you iso titus you will find her calling RM town from very early on.

don_johnson · Post Post #2049 (ISO) » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:54 am

that was on day 1, sister.