![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
spoiler about 1436 in case someone wants to read and be surprised
May I ask what point that is?
I skimmed mollie's meta a bit, and it seems like it's normal for her to go for long periods of time without activity, so I don't think she looks suspicious. I don't really think she needs any more votes on her right now. Of course, I'm a newbie, so if there's any particular reason for that wagon existing I'd like to hear about it.In post 29, Huntress wrote:@ Mala: Why didn't you join our molliewagon?
@ emerald and NP: What do you think about the wagon on mollie?
In post 16, Shadowmod wrote:
In post 34, Malakittens wrote:Um. We don't actually know if he confirmed a role. He could have just did /confirm and didn't put alignment information.
I really just don't like your last post, however.
Also that's kinda a false interpretation of Mollie's meta. However once she starts posting I should be able to decently figure out her alignment. There's only been one game she threw me off recently but it's only because I have encountered scum her only twice
It did!In post 33, emeraldemon wrote:Maybe a vote will convince our lurker to come out of hiding.
VOTE: Rothwell
I don't really have much to input, and I don't fancy random lynching as everyone seems to have done so have just observed.In post 37, emeraldemon wrote:All I meant is that Rothwell seems to be around, which makes me wonder if he's following the thread but not posting for some reason.
You mean random voting? We are currently in RVS stage which brings up discussion and possible information in the long run. The faster we are out of it the better.In post 38, Rothwell wrote:It did!In post 33, emeraldemon wrote:Maybe a vote will convince our lurker to come out of hiding.
VOTE: Rothwell
I don't really have much to input, and I don't fancy random lynching as everyone seems to have done so have just observed.In post 37, emeraldemon wrote:All I meant is that Rothwell seems to be around, which makes me wonder if he's following the thread but not posting for some reason.
Oh I see, I think it was just mutual misunderstanding then. I didn't mean "role" like doctor/cop/tracker I just meant confirmed in general that he got the role pm.In post 39, Malakittens wrote:When you try to multiquote. Hit the quotes you want then hit preview. You hit submit which posted the multiquote instead of giving you the option to type.
You're not misinterpreting this, but I might have read yours wrong. You looked to me like you were indirectly role fishing. As I said they probably confirmed , but never stated their alignment. Just when I hear role I thought maybe you were role faising that's all.
not in the early bits. so huhIn post 32, Neater Plastic wrote:I skimmed mollie's meta a bit, and it seems like it's normal for her to go for long periods of time without activity, so I don't think she looks suspicious. I don't really think she needs any more votes on her right now. Of course, I'm a newbie, so if there's any particular reason for that wagon existing I'd like to hear about it.In post 29, Huntress wrote:@ Mala: Why didn't you join our molliewagon?
@ emerald and NP: What do you think about the wagon on mollie?
Why did you point out that mollie hadn't confirmed in the manner requested but not mention that DC hadn't done so either? Not sure if this was what GM was thinking of but it was why I thought it worth tossing a vote in your direction. There was also a slight hint of buddying later on. Not much but more than I had on anyone else at that time.In post 31, TierShift wrote:May I ask what point that is?
I was already on a perfectly good wagon. If I didn't really care which why would I change?In post 33, emeraldemon wrote:huntress: At first I was thinking #29 meant I was really missing something about tiershift. But now I'm starting to think huntress may just want to get a wagon rolling and doesn't really care which. But is that town? If she's really agreeing with goodmorning just to agree, that actually feels a bit scummy to me.
How is asking questions not contributing?In post 42, Neater Plastic wrote:Reasoning: She seems to be wagoning without actually contributing anything. I don't think it means much this early on, but it's something.
Well, I was talking about mollie specifically at that point, I suppose I could have also noted that there was someone else yet to confirm, but it wasn'tIn post 44, Huntress wrote:Why did you point out that mollie hadn't confirmed in the manner requested but not mention that DC hadn't done so either?In post 31, TierShift wrote:May I ask what point that is?
I don't really follow the reasoning in this post. Why wouldn't scum look to this 'hidden intent', which obviously isn't even there? Is this a way to make goodmorning look townish while at the same time distancing yourself from her?emeraldemon wrote:goodmorning: looking back, I like that goodmorning caught me not mentioning malakittens in 1436. Looking for hidden intent to my post, feels town. I don't really understand what she sees about tiershift, though.
Why ask Huntress and not me?
Here's a little advice: when a game's just started and I'm not familiar with any of the players, I sometimes look for things that seem odd somehow and point them out.In post 38, Rothwell wrote:I don't really have much to input, and I don't fancy random lynching as everyone seems to have done so have just observed.In post 37, emeraldemon wrote:All I meant is that Rothwell seems to be around, which makes me wonder if he's following the thread but not posting for some reason.