Shadow's terminally happy Newbie 1451 game over,mod exploded

pirate mollie · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:23 pm

Skip to next vote count.

then what was your point

Malakittens · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:25 pm

Soooo.
I know this is really early, but I think Huntress is town. Like I think I'm really, really sure.

pirate mollie · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:27 pm

what do you think of gm mala

Malakittens · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:29 pm

I need more posts from gm to be able to correctly read her.

pirate mollie · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:31 pm

you wouldn't be her scum partner would you

Malakittens · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:35 pm

In post 54, pirate mollie wrote:you wouldn't be her scum partner would you

Mollie. I directly 'caught' scum Goodmorning in two of her most recent games. However I didn't replace into one, but I replaced into another, but failed to get her lynched before I was NK'd.

When I say I need more time, I need more time.

Want to back off and let me have it?

pirate mollie · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:59 pm

I will wait for you to catch up then but that didn't really answer my question

so the newbs need love or they will start to feel left out

VOTE: that neat package thing

Malakittens · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:02 pm

The answer is no, but I mean there has to be a reason why you're asking it. I'm just not ready to dance with you yet.

I'm caught up. I have never been not caught up.

pirate mollie · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:10 pm

by "caught up" I mean that gm is scum

Malakittens · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:15 pm

Why is she scum?

pirate mollie · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:17 pm

jesus christ. look at them. just

look at them

Malakittens · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:22 pm

Yeah, I'm not seeing what you are seeing.

pirate mollie · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:30 pm

r u being for real or are u trolling me

gm is a top notch player she is setting up early game play so she doesn't have to

she looks nervous, tentative and drops off. <----scum

Malakittens · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:32 pm

Why aren't you voting her then?

pirate mollie · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:35 pm

In post 63, Malakittens wrote:Why aren't you voting her then?

cos the newbs need lurve and I believe I said this already?

Malakittens · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:38 pm

In post 64, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 63, Malakittens wrote:Why aren't you voting her then?
cos the newbs need lurve and I believe I said this already?

Random voting when you think you have a scum read isn't that good.

Probably better to put a vote on someone you believe is scum rather than just vote because you don't want people to be left out.

Neater Plastic · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 6:45 pm

In post 62, pirate mollie wrote:r u being for real or are u trolling me

gm is a top notch player she is setting up early game play so she doesn't have to

she looks nervous, tentative and drops off. <----scum

I don't see her doing any of those things. So far she's voted for TierShift on a hunch, and she's given Rothwell some advice on how to get started. Seems neutral to me.

In post 51, Malakittens wrote:Soooo.
I know this is really early, but I think Huntress is town. Like I think I'm really, really sure.

Duly noted. But shouldn't you take your vote off of her, then?

I was ready to let that vote go anyway, and Malakittens seems pretty trustworthy so far.
UNVOTE: Huntress
And I've got a better vote anyway. That would be...
VOTE: pirate mollie
Not OMGUS, I just don't like the way she's locked onto goodmorning after only three unextraordinary posts. It is a bit weird for her to not even vote for goodmorning, too... That's a bit of a mystery to me. Maybe she wanted to see my reaction, which would be town, or maybe she wanted to look more town by toning down her attack on GM a bit and pretending to be trying to gauge my reaction, which would be scum. I can't tell, but she seems more scum to me because of her arguments against goodmorning.

Malakittens · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 6:52 pm

I forgot about my vote on her.

UNVOTE: Huntress

Ill come back on Mollie.

pirate mollie · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:23 pm

In post 65, Malakittens wrote:
In post 64, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 63, Malakittens wrote:Why aren't you voting her then?
cos the newbs need lurve and I believe I said this already?
Random voting when you think you have a scum read isn't that good.

it is in a 9 player game when you are potential partner hunting. don't even pretend like you do not know that this is what I am doing since I do it in nearly every 9 player game I play in

Probably better to put a vote on someone you believe is scum rather than just vote because you don't want people to be left out.

okay are you posturing for effect cos of the newbies or are you posting this post as legit wrt me. I can't tell

dead serious question

Malakittens · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:29 pm

In post 68, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 65, Malakittens wrote:
In post 64, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 63, Malakittens wrote:Why aren't you voting her then?
cos the newbs need lurve and I believe I said this already?
Random voting when you think you have a scum read isn't that good.
it is in a 9 player game when you are potential partner hunting. don't even pretend like you do not know that this is what I am doing since I do it in nearly every 9 player game I play in

Probably better to put a vote on someone you believe is scum rather than just vote because you don't want people to be left out.
okay are you posturing for effect cos of the newbies or are you posting this post as legit wrt me. I can't tell

dead serious question

I hunt potential partners after I get a flip. I only do it before hand if I'm really, really sure. I'm not pretending that I don't know what you're doing, but the fact is saying me if I'm scum partners with x isn't going to accomplish anything and you know that.

I'm being legit. I rather not have newbies think they can just lazy vote someone else when they are thinking someone else is a scum read.

pirate mollie · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:42 pm

then we have a different approach to newbies.

I am not going to baby them cos when they get into the larger games they will be eaten alive. I think you DO know what I am doing if you gave it half a second to think about it.

me saying you are scum partners with x does accomplish something in that I can gauge your reaction <------ why the fuck are you trying to illegitimise this game approach on a site where this is what a lot of us do?

Malakittens · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:52 pm

Who's ever going to admit truthfully to yes I'm his scum partner.

I do which is why I haven't voted you.

Our newbies need to appear though. One has already admitted to lurking; which can be taken two ways. He's mafia and scared to post or he's town and is lost. It's like why haven't I jumped on him because I'm waiting to see what happens.

Malakittens · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:53 pm

In post 32, Neater Plastic wrote:
In post 29, Huntress wrote:@ Mala: Why didn't you join our molliewagon?

@ emerald and NP: What do you think about the wagon on mollie?
I skimmed mollie's meta a bit, and it seems like it's normal for her to go for long periods of time without activity, so I don't think she looks suspicious. I don't really think she needs any more votes on her right now. Of course, I'm a newbie, so if there's any particular reason for that wagon existing I'd like to hear about it.

In post 66, Neater Plastic wrote:
In post 62, pirate mollie wrote:r u being for real or are u trolling me

gm is a top notch player she is setting up early game play so she doesn't have to

she looks nervous, tentative and drops off. <----scum
I don't see her doing any of those things. So far she's voted for TierShift on a hunch, and she's given Rothwell some advice on how to get started. Seems neutral to me.

In post 51, Malakittens wrote:Soooo.
I know this is really early, but I think Huntress is town. Like I think I'm really, really sure.
Duly noted. But shouldn't you take your vote off of her, then?

I was ready to let that vote go anyway, and Malakittens seems pretty trustworthy so far.
UNVOTE: Huntress
And I've got a better vote anyway. That would be...
VOTE: pirate mollie
Not OMGUS, I just don't like the way she's locked onto goodmorning after only three unextraordinary posts. It is a bit weird for her to not even vote for goodmorning, too... That's a bit of a mystery to me. Maybe she wanted to see my reaction, which would be town, or maybe she wanted to look more town by toning down her attack on GM a bit and pretending to be trying to gauge my reaction, which would be scum. I can't tell, but she seems more scum to me because of her arguments against goodmorning.

How much of her meta did you actually read or look up?

pirate mollie · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:01 pm

In post 66, Neater Plastic wrote:I don't see her doing any of those things. So far she's voted for TierShift on a hunch, and she's given Rothwell some advice on how to get started. Seems neutral to me.

while I am trying to give her space since she is an IC and fairly new, I think that it is her very neutral approach that is troubling. she seems to be trying to blend in.

Not OMGUS, I just don't like the way she's locked onto goodmorning after only three unextraordinary posts. It is a bit weird for her to not even vote for goodmorning, too... That's a bit of a mystery to me. Maybe she wanted to see my reaction, which would be town, or maybe she wanted to look more town by toning down her attack on GM a bit and pretending to be trying to gauge my reaction, which would be scum. I can't tell, but she seems more scum to me because of her arguments against goodmorning.

I am not "locked down" onto anything. plz don't misrep me like that. my reads are generally pretty fluid as I gather more info.

and I think you are over thinking my motivations and what is funny is that I do this too! I often think scum are more diabolical then they actually

are

and it bites me in the ass every single time.

so your case so far:

1. I think gm is scum
2. you have a different read

so why am I scummy again?

goodmorning · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:09 pm

In post 50, pirate mollie wrote:then what was your point

My point was that he doesn't know anyone and that might be a way that works for him.

In post 51, Malakittens wrote:Soooo.
I know this is really early, but I think Huntress is town. Like I think I'm really, really sure.

How sure is really sure, on a scale of ("hey i just met you") 1-to10 (Innocent Child)?

In post 62, pirate mollie wrote:gm is a top notch player she is setting up early game play so she doesn't have to

Doesn't have to...?

she looks nervous, tentative and drops off. <----scum

Sorry I'm not, I guess? And what do you mean, "drops off"?

Probably I should say this better. "I" and "C" are two letters which can directly and/or indirectly influence the thought processes of newbs, whether consciously or not.
Normally, I don't care overmuch about this.
Normally, I have better than gut by now and the newbies have posted more.
Make of that what you will.