Trisania
WBOCampfire1104
Grimgroove (SE)
Thanks for replacing in, SD. Long time, no play!
Cheers. Yes, long time. I take it by the fact this thread isn't 50+ pages and you haven't self-hammered that you're scum? This should be easy.In post 500, fferyllt wrote:I think this is correct.
Trisania
thiscantgowrongSafetyDance
Cervantesfferyllt
MontoshhayatoBL
WBOCampfire1104
Grimgroove (SE)
GuyInFreezerNobody Special (IC)
Thanks for replacing in, SD. Long time, no play!
That's just the thing: I haven't really seen you try figure things out like I'm used of you.In post 484, fferyllt wrote:I can tell.In post 483, Grimgroove wrote:From my perspective he's fine, since he heavily questioned mine.
I'll be frank with you fferyllt: you're my second biggest scumread this game. My concerns from when you arrived have still not been dispelled.
I'm not impervious to signs that someone is suspicious of me.
To be frank in return, I'm more concerned with figuring things out than with dispelling your suspicions.
I tend to perseverate about stuff. The TNE lynch is a stake in the ground, and the player it most incriminates is GiF because I feel like he should have known better and recognized the town-defiance in some of TNE's posts. It's the main reason I'm voting NS.In post 507, Grimgroove wrote:Something suddenly came up at work, back now, hope you found time for coffee.
So yes, fferyllt, why the repeated emphasis on the TNE-lynch and you not liking it? Why do you keep bringing that up?
Could you also say "why"' you would have stopped that lynch and which arguments you would have used in order to do so?
We have two games together, one of which was a complete clusterfuck, and the other of which I think I played quite solidly, though town lost in the end. I can see expecting competence from me, and I think I've brought competence to the game. The problem is that for the most part, players I want to sort further haven't been present. Though at this point, I don't expect NS to wow me with his towniness and turn the game on its ear, the question of where the second scum (assuming NS is scum) is hiding maybe should be consuming me, but I want certainty about NS before moving onward.In post 508, Grimgroove wrote:That's just the thing: I haven't really seen you try figure things out like I'm used of you.In post 484, fferyllt wrote:I can tell.In post 483, Grimgroove wrote:From my perspective he's fine, since he heavily questioned mine.
I'll be frank with you fferyllt: you're my second biggest scumread this game. My concerns from when you arrived have still not been dispelled.
I'm not impervious to signs that someone is suspicious of me.
To be frank in return, I'm more concerned with figuring things out than with dispelling your suspicions.
The interactions you've been having in this game look far less meaningful than what I'm used to of you, and give the air of windowdressing.
What have you figured out so far?
So you think the people who are present don't need further softening?In post 510, fferyllt wrote:We have two games together, one of which was a complete clusterfuck, and the other of which I think I played quite solidly, though town lost in the end. I can see expecting competence from me, and I think I've brought competence to the game. The problem is that for the most part, players I want to sort further haven't been present. Though at this point, I don't expect NS to wow me with his towniness and turn the game on its ear, the question of where the second scum (assuming NS is scum) is hiding maybe should be consuming me, but I want certainty about NS before moving onward.
I don't think this adds up.In post 509, fferyllt wrote:I tend to perseverate about stuff. The TNE lynch is a stake in the ground, and the player it most incriminates is GiF because I feel like he should have known better and recognized the town-defiance in some of TNE's posts. It's the main reason I'm voting NS.In post 507, Grimgroove wrote:Something suddenly came up at work, back now, hope you found time for coffee.
So yes, fferyllt, why the repeated emphasis on the TNE-lynch and you not liking it? Why do you keep bringing that up?
Could you also say "why"' you would have stopped that lynch and which arguments you would have used in order to do so?
My argument would have focused on that tone - the town-defiance. What I'm not sure about is who I would have found more suspicious if I had been in-the-moment during day 1. Possibly GiF, though I think he would have played the game a little differently if I had been present.
Hayato has yet to reply to my last post to him.In post 514, Grimgroove wrote:So you think the people who are present don't need further softening?In post 510, fferyllt wrote:We have two games together, one of which was a complete clusterfuck, and the other of which I think I played quite solidly, though town lost in the end. I can see expecting competence from me, and I think I've brought competence to the game. The problem is that for the most part, players I want to sort further haven't been present. Though at this point, I don't expect NS to wow me with his towniness and turn the game on its ear, the question of where the second scum (assuming NS is scum) is hiding maybe should be consuming me, but I want certainty about NS before moving onward.
I'll update my reads list later today.Can you explain your townreads on those people?
GiF specifically because I know that he has played other games with TNE and I think he has a similar level of caution to mine when it comes to scum-reading TNE for being TNE.In post 515, Grimgroove wrote:I don't think this adds up.In post 509, fferyllt wrote:I tend to perseverate about stuff. The TNE lynch is a stake in the ground, and the player it most incriminates is GiF because I feel like he should have known better and recognized the town-defiance in some of TNE's posts. It's the main reason I'm voting NS.In post 507, Grimgroove wrote:Something suddenly came up at work, back now, hope you found time for coffee.
So yes, fferyllt, why the repeated emphasis on the TNE-lynch and you not liking it? Why do you keep bringing that up?
Could you also say "why"' you would have stopped that lynch and which arguments you would have used in order to do so?
My argument would have focused on that tone - the town-defiance. What I'm not sure about is who I would have found more suspicious if I had been in-the-moment during day 1. Possibly GiF, though I think he would have played the game a little differently if I had been present.
"He should have known better" implies there was a strong argument for TNE-town, but there wasn't. Town defiance is not a strong argument and you of all people know that fferyllt. When did defiance become a town-tell? Can you show me where you used that before as a towntell?
And even if it were a towntell, how does it incriminate people not considering it as such, and why GiF specifically?
In post 682, morph the cat wrote:I was also recently scum with him. Cabd was town in that game (Chef Mafia). I think it was the 3rd or 4th game I've played with him. In the others we were both town IIRC, except for hunterxhunterx. I've found that his play is very much dependent how much time he has for mafia. In general, looking back at earlier games that I didn't play but meta'd during the first game or two we played together, being (relatively) involved and serious about the game is associated with his scum play.In post 669, zMuffinMan wrote:btw i'm pretty sure TNE is town here. or at least his play here is totally unlike the play from when i was scum with him.
I'm going to review hunterxhunterx. The scum game we recently finished he only made 2-3 posts iirc and was the day 1 lynch.
In post 947, morph the cat wrote:Gonna quick throw my read changes in:
Mac - Town.
TNE - leaning town.
Slight niggle about Mastin for that claim demand given the caution in bork's post.
Kinda like GiF but he needs to step it up if he's town.
I imagine I would have put together a similar defense in this game.In post 1443, morph the cat wrote:TNE ISO Highlights
I liked his entrance into the thread, and the first post that really gave me a town sense was actually pretty early: 291. I liked that he wasn't avoiding GiF. He didn't back down about Varsoon's early AtE. The question mark, really was his assertion of familiarity with Varsoon's xenogears play. I have'nt really seen TNE as a meta-heavy player, and this was a game he didn't play.
350 is a pretty strong stance on BRO.
356and next post in ISO are pretty cheeky responses to being scumread by thezmon.
630 reads list is pretty iconoclastic in some ways.
885, 886 cases on his scumreads. This is way more detailed and thoughtful than what I'm used to seeing from TNE. If he's town I hope he'll play like this more often.
Subsequent back and forth with BRO feels very much like someone who thinks they are talking to scum.
I'm townreading the fuck out of this ISO.
So you're basically saying I'm the weak link. Could you please cite.instances where I got "rocked off balance easily"? Because I think I was able to adequately address hayato's concerns/suspicions about me.In post 516, WBOCampfire1104 wrote:TRISIANA: I don't really have much to say (and haven't for a while), but you seem to get rocked off balance easily. Beware. A hayato-assault might get you a lynch.
Rocking players off balance and seeing how they react is a fundamental scumhunting tool. There are other tools: including doing the complete opposite - not rocking the boat and observing what sorts of ripples other players make in the game without interference.In post 516, WBOCampfire1104 wrote:Here's some poking at believed town players (short, negative explanations that accompany the scumlist)
HAYATOBL: Why do you ask so many questions? It's not because I can't answer them (putting @WBO in front of the paragraph or bolding the question helps), but you seem to have a tendency to always rock players off. This is starting to seem like a more town-tactic than scum-tactic, but you could really screw your PR's if you aren't careful. PR's can act scummy sometimes.
There is no town role that protects from being mislynched. I wish you would stop speculating out loud about power roles. Day 3, especially if we don't lynch scum today, is when town's PRs can make a huge difference in how the game day proceeds.NOBODY SPECIAL: Why don't you post much? And when you do, it's practically useless? This is getting you lynched. Your don't care attitude comes from either having strong trust in a scumpartner (still for GG) or having some type of partially-invincible town role. Which would call you for NK's, if possible.
Your certainty that she's town, and your blantant buddying her, are two of the aspects of your play that look scummy to me. Newbtown players almost always retain suspicions about other players.TRISIANA: I don't really have much to say (and haven't for a while), but you seem to get rocked off balance easily. Beware. A hayato-assault might get you a lynch.
I'm assertive in my own way, I guess. The TNE-lynch annoys me because it should have been averted/avertable, but I'll eventually get over that aspect of day 1. It stays on my mind because it's hard evidence about who is town and who is scum in this game in much the same way that Zipperflesh's NK is. I'm not primarily a hard-evidence based player, but it's something tangible from the days when I wasn't in the game and couldn't interact.FFERYLLT: You seem to have a "I'm the boss" attitude. You kind of peck on everyone's TNE-lynch mistake, and get everyone else off balance. Kind of like hayato; a fferyllt-hayato team? Unlikely but possible.
Why are you, a new-ish to MS player, not suspicious of me - a player whose style leads to body of work reads - and those take time to tilt to town, especially among new-ish players.
I have a certain amount of suspicion towards every player in the game. Towards some greater than others. Though, I prioritize and choose which argument, I would like to present. My way of posting should already indicate that I spend only a fixed amount of time for MS. Thus, the argument which I think is more important comes first.Suspicions lead to questions about stances, votes, lack of votes, etc. Until this post, you haven't questioned me about stance, votes, etc.
Your trajectory on NS is as solid as on WBO IMO. Now that you’ve voted for NS, it just seems like there was no (or a weaker) trajectory on WBO.My trajectory on NS is pretty solid IMO. My vote was drawn by the deadline approaching. Now that it's there, I'm leaving it because NS is dragging his heels.
My other case is pretty tinfoil hat, and I'm treating it as such. It involves WBO, but I'm not pursuing him on that basis.In post 523, hayatoBL wrote:@ffreyllt
Why are you, a new-ish to MS player, not suspicious of me - a player whose style leads to body of work reads - and those take time to tilt to town, especially among new-ish players.I have a certain amount of suspicion towards every player in the game. Towards some greater than others. Though, I prioritize and choose which argument, I would like to present. My way of posting should already indicate that I spend only a fixed amount of time for MS. Thus, the argument which I think is more important comes first.Suspicions lead to questions about stances, votes, lack of votes, etc. Until this post, you haven't questioned me about stance, votes, etc.
I had a disagreement with you about your move towards WBO. Besides the WBO case, the NS case and other case which include a lot about meta mainly about GiF, I don’t recall you having any other case which you strongly addressed.
In mafia, trajectory means something pretty specific to me. And my trajectory on WDO has more of a trail mostly because he's been around at times to at least talk to. If my vote on the GiF/NS slot came as a surprise then you really need to look at my ISO again.Your trajectory on NS is as solid as on WBO IMO. Now that you’ve voted for NS, it just seems like there was no (or a weaker) trajectory on WBO.My trajectory on NS is pretty solid IMO. My vote was drawn by the deadline approaching. Now that it's there, I'm leaving it because NS is dragging his heels.
Are you denying this?
I don't follow my meta. My meta follows me.You didn’t vote on WBO to apply pressure. Maybe applying pressure would work. According to your meta, you vote on someone when you want that person to be lynched. Why not be flexible about it? Why must you follow your own meta?