In post 343, Grimgroove wrote:My gut agrees with townreading XScorpion so I'm not discrediting the subject of the townread. I am discrediting the author of the townread. The reasons that were given for townreading Xscorpion were crap.
When I see crappy reasons for townreads I get suspicious. And so should you.
I understand the position; what I don't understand is why you didn't aggress harder off it.
In post 213, XScorpion wrote:Hermy is the person most likely to get away with a hammer and not immediately die the next day because both you and her would make excuses saying that 'oh it's because she's lynch-bait' etc. etc.
So much of this.
If it's a consolation, it's also an argument for my vote on you.
In what way "do you understand my position"?
I still need to catch up with the last few pages, don't think it will be for today.
"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier
In post 349, Turkish Van wrote:I get that it's an awkward position to be in, to be talking to someone who knows you when you don't know their identity, but the timing of it feels less curious and more 'looking for ways to derail the case.'
huh?
How would knowing the identity of the person dancing with him help him derail the case?
TierShift (2) - XScorpion, Desperado
Who (2) - Trine, Turkish Van
Hermy (1) - Who
Grimgroove (1) - BROseidon
BROseidon (1) - Hermy
Not Voting (2) - TierShift, Grimgroove
9 alive, 5 to lynch.
Deadline is on December 14th, 12 p.m. PST.
Countdown: (expired on 2013-12-14 12:00:00)
Searching for a replacement for Hermy.
CLICK HERE FOR THE ALDUSKKEL APPRECIATION PAGE
"i've only known aldus for four and a half months but if anything happened to him i would kill everyone in this room and then myself" -Datisi, March 28 2020
Avatar made by Brandi.
Prodded. My thoughts on things people are talking about:
I don't think Who asking about the identity of the head is scummy, but the unvote/vote thing is definitely stupid.
The Bro/GG thing seems like town on town to me.
I am curious as to why there are still two people not voting (Tier, GG)?
Well I don't have a certain scumread atm, so that's why I'm not voting. I'd like to lynch desp, but I haven't been able to point out exactly why. I'm also on the fence about Who, whose explanations baffle me. Not as in I think they're super scummy, but as in I have no idea what he's saying.
Who, what do you mean with forced activity? And how was the unvote a reaction test for hermy?
Why do you believe you need a 'certain scumread' to vote? Do you not believe that voting people for pressure helps to get reactions that indicate whether players are town or scum? Not voting anyone is about as useful as the announced unvote reaction test.
Well, I think you shouldn't vote for someone you think is town, but I don't think a scumread is absolutely needed. You can vote for someone either because they are scum and you want them lynched, or because you don't know their alignment and hope that some pressure will help giving it away.
So I could vote for pressure, but I don't see the need for it at this particular moment.
Not much has changed about desp. He's been staying on the sidelines since we've had our little debate. That means my point about deflecting and general gut still stands. I don't particularly like 307, I feel it's a tad like sheeping without actually saying he is sheeping. That could very well be desp's style of play though, does anyone know him well enough to judge about that?
Someone asked for a reason why Who shouldn't be lynched. I was making it clear that I had no such reasons (and, thus, wouldn't object to lynching him).
In post 357, TierShift wrote:Well I don't have a certain scumread atm, so that's why I'm not voting. I'd like to lynch desp, but I haven't been able to point out exactly why. I'm also on the fence about Who, whose explanations baffle me. Not as in I think they're super scummy, but as in I have no idea what he's saying.
Who, what do you mean with forced activity? And how was the unvote a reaction test for hermy?
If I don't feel I have anything to say and I force myself to say something, whatever I say/do will be totally pointless, like the desp-reaction test.
Hermy leapt on the desp-wagon after I voted desp, right as it was building up. I wanted to see if Hermy would change wagons as soon as it began to lose followers, which Hermy did.
Who said that?
Chamber. It's all a conspiracy.
Or is it?
Someone asked for a reason why Who shouldn't be lynched. I was making it clear that I had no such reasons (and, thus, wouldn't object to lynching him).
What in any of that is sheeping?
I note with trepidation that you aren't putting nearly as much into this game as you can.
Someone asked for a reason why Who shouldn't be lynched. I was making it clear that I had no such reasons (and, thus, wouldn't object to lynching him).
What in any of that is sheeping?
My wording is bad. Trying to say: you are agreeing with a who lynch without being tracable. It's not much of a tell, but I don't really understand the purpose of the post, I don't think Trine wanted everyone to answer 'no, I don't object', without putting in further reasoning.
@Who thanks for telling me that hermy thing, hadn't realized that before, omg that is scummy like how did I even not see that. XS, now I have someone to vote for, a replacement being pressured from the get-go is something I like. VOTE: hermy
