P-EDIT: Cherry, why?
Obscurity, please answer the questions I asked.
-V
Hah, missed Obscurity's first post. Don't like that one either. And his fourth post is also meeeeeeh. Will you post some reads anytime soon Obscurity?In post 180, The Silver Bard wrote:So after reading through the game I got a townread on BBmolla, Bulbazak and Stuffed Crust.
And I am scumreading TierShift and Obscurity. The reads are basically gut reads, or in other words how I feel their posts.
TierShifts posts seems strange to me, and I get an unnatural feel to how he plays. His 113 and 126 feels overly defensive and his 143 feels very made up, I don't see why he ffels the need to comment on bbmolla in such a generic way, and I don't see what good his question at Obscurity will do, it just feels forced to me.
Obscurity's two posts seems very strange to me. I don't like either one of them. His first post feels like he is trying to hard to be funny and easygoing. His second post is the same, while not providing any content. He is also lurking hardcore. I am ok with lynching both as of now. But I think Obscurity is the best one, as TierShift at least is posting and will probably doom himself if he is scum.
VOTE: Obscurity
Because he dropped a RVS vote and then lurked away all of his problems and is not addressing anything that comes his way. Heck, I asked him this early in the game, and I still haven't heard from him regarding it:In post 196, The Silver Bard wrote: Why is Fu probably scum?
If people are going to call Obscurity scum for lurking and not addressing questions addressed to him, they need to do so to Fu as well, perhaps even more so, since his play feels very surface anyway.In post 55, Bulbazak wrote:Fu, what's with the hard on for me? This seems to be more than just standard RVS BS.
That's it? You're not going to address anything else? And what's with only checking in every 3 days anyway?
Fair enough.In post 200, Stuffed Crust wrote:@Bulba:If it was an opportunistic push, then I'd be pushing. I just want answers. As for my scum-hunting being sub-standard, well, yeah. It kinda is. Sorry?
I didn't realize you wanted a response to that, but, well, here it is.In post 180, The Silver Bard wrote: TierShifts posts seems strange to me, and I get an unnatural feel to how he plays. His 113 and 126 feels overly defensive and his 143 feels very made up, I don't see why he ffels the need to comment on bbmolla in such a generic way, and I don't see what good his question at Obscurity will do, it just feels forced to me.
I don't see the difference between our sheeps. Mind explaining?In post 200, Stuffed Crust wrote:@Tier:I'm allowed to be a hypocrite. There's also differences in the sheeps you've made and the one I just pulled. If anything, what's important is to discern the nature of a vote/sheep, and call attention to what is problematic in it. In that regard, we're operating on a similar level.
This is the post that pretty much made me reconsider my "Obscurity is low hanging fruit" deal. Im cool with this.
I'm all ears.In post 221, CherryDrPepper wrote: Obs partner is Bulbazak.
No, I just know how you operate, whereas Tier does not.In post 223, CherryDrPepper wrote: Well for one, your post 16 bugged me. Your tried to buddy is from an RVS reason.
I'm no longer voting him, but I did have a scumread on him, and I explained why several times.In post 223, CherryDrPepper wrote:
Second you're strongly scum reading Fu but still vote Stuffed Crust for, idk why.
How would that work exactly? I'm not voting Fu, because I have no interest in placing a vote on him at this point in time. I'm more interested in what Ob's response will be.In post 223, CherryDrPepper wrote: Its like youre trying to save obs fmpov by not voting the player who is similar to obs.