flameaxe was laced with ad hom (1), kept arguing that he was scumhunting (2), fought against a deadline extension (3), didn't seem to engage either scum (4) and missed both wagons (5). possible third party, would have to see how flipped scum interacted with him. maybe just town and a jerk. would like his input at this time.
(1) When did this site drop so low that this is an auto-scum tell without any reasoning? As I've asked plenty of people: What is the scum motivation of any of it? How does me calling a dipshit a dipshit make me scum? (This isn't rhetorical, although I can see why I would be taken that way).
Reading an iso is nice:
In post 221, don_johnson wrote:actually, now that I think about it, the attack on flameaxe probably strengthens my conviction a little. its pretty easy to attack a guy who is acting like a jerk. but imo, ad hom =/= scummy. it really depends on the context. I think remembrance spoke on that earlier. however, when you're building a case against someone(especially on day 1 with such a large pool of players) pushing against someone who is acting like an asshole is a good strategy as it is easier to convince others to lynch them. so yeah.
What has changed?
(2) Same question. Considering the context, why does this matter in your read?
(3) I've explained my thought process on this, and haven't read any reason why it is scummy. The last week of day one only proves my point. Days help the town, but there are diminishing returns. We went well into that realm on day 1. Look at the lynch on day 1, it essentially came down to "this person isn't posting as much as usual". The longer day didn't help us get there.
(4) The only one in your list I find valid. I didn't interact with either, don't really have a reason why.
(5) I don't consider this a valid point considering I posted one time during day 2, prior to the claim. You know, the 48 hour day? I also don't think it was all that hidden that I wanted a different lynch day one.
Overarching comments: Points 1-3 were valid before day 2, but only come up now. Sorry, its a little convenient on the timing. Only one other post mentioning me before this page:
In post 698, don_johnson wrote:did I miss something? SoS looks like scum here. why are we suddenly against hammering? and how did the topic of innocent child even come up? all I see is SoS claiming to have crumbed miller at som epoint(coming to light at L-1) and then some half assed dayvig claim which was unsuccessful? really? there is no reason not to see this lynch through. I guess there could be a .00001% chance that flameaxe is a bp townie and SoS is a dayvig. so yeah, let's risk a no lynch for such incredible odds. :/
Something smells funny about your reads post. My train of thought has basically derailed now.
Heyato's 867 really doesn't sit well with me.
(I wrote this post 4 hours ago and had to keep the window untouched because loldowntime).
