Mini 1536 - Silph Co. Reverse Mafia (Game Over)

Zekrom25 · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:57 pm

In post 299, cxinlee wrote:What was your thought process when you made #259?

i was just thinking about this rule

In post 1, Espeonage wrote:
Rules and Important Info

Rules

2a. If you are going to be V/LA use bold to announce it in this thread

Rainbowdash · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Fri Jan 17, 2014 5:29 pm

In post 296, cxinlee wrote:Which post said it wasn’t for pressure?

Mmhm, I’ll self-meta here and say that I have done similar things before and get people to contribute (Not just be active). Hint: I already posted the link.

You think that my post was only to get him active, yet you disagree that my post is for pressure (Activity votes are considered to be pressure votes)?

You essentially said it wasn't for pressure.

When you voted him for pressure in the past, you actually said what you were doing when it happened. This game you make zero reference to it being pressure. This time you tried to string together reasoning for the vote. You even fully acknowledge that Ken was posting some content when you voted him.

So the game state, your own meta, and your vote all point to a vote that was not for pressure, but instead an attack. When the wagon started falling apart, then you said it was for pressure to help him posting and getting a read. At the same time though it didn't help you get a read, which is confusing because you use content to get reads. If you have zero read there wasn't substantial content or something like that.

Maxous · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:54 pm

In post 296, cxinlee wrote:(Of course with a lot of cautiousness exerted)

stop going 'i'm so cautious' and start kicking ass in the thread.
that is what I am saying.

TierShift · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:47 pm

Great, another push by cx that he himself seems unconvinced of.

Whiskers · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:51 pm

In post 296, cxinlee wrote:You think that my post was only to get him active, yet you disagree that my post is for pressure (Activity votes are considered to be pressure votes)?

Voting, making a post, accusing someone are all actions. Do you disagree with this?

I still don't see the contradictions.

Dude, someone was like, "He's scum 'cause he CLAIMS he voted for pressure!" and then you quoted him and was like, "Yeah, that

would

be true, if I

were

voting for pressure!!"

Whiskers · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:53 pm

In post 302, Maxous wrote:
In post 296, cxinlee wrote:(Of course with a lot of cautiousness exerted)
stop going 'i'm so cautious' and start kicking ass in the thread.
that is what I am saying.

You're currently my fave, Maxi.

Espeonage · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 3:01 am

Vote Count

Empking:

Bulbazak, TierShift, Whiskers

cxinlee:

Maxous, Dry-fit, Aj The Epic, Rainbowdash (L-3)

Zekrom25:

Kenobi, cxinlee

TierShift:

Paschendale, Empking

Not Voting:

Psyche, Zekrom25

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Now with 83% more accuracy.

Paschendale · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:06 am

I'm getting tired of this crap. Put up or face the rope, Cx.

Unvote
Vote: Cx

Zekrom25 · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:32 am

In post 307, Paschendale wrote:I'm getting tired of this crap. Put up or face the rope, Cx.

Unvote
Vote: Cx

@Paschendale what's your reason for this ?

Dry-fit · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 3:31 pm

In post 303, TierShift wrote:Great, another push by cx that he himself seems unconvinced of.

Gotta love that passive aggressive sarcasm Tier.

Unvote. Vote: Tiershift.

You've taken yourself over the edge here my man.

Bulbazak · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:15 pm

In post 248, Zekrom25 wrote: however the back & forth between Empking / Bulbazak possibly seems one is hiding something

Hiding what? This post is so waffly it hurts. What is your point?

In post 251, Empking wrote: It took four players (me, Tier, Bulb and Psyche) to prove me wrong. If Bulb was a town, there's no question that it could've been found much quicker.

True. I just dislike stating how often I beat my wife.

In post 254, Zekrom25 wrote: however the back & forth between Empking / Bulbazak possibly seems one is hiding something

Is the lead in the water making you repeat things, or are you trying to float a possible push and seeing how people react?

In post 259, Zekrom25 wrote:
In post 224, Kenobi wrote:I'm going to be V/LA for the next 3 or 4 days.
i find this post from Kenobi suspicious since the rules clearly say to use bold text to inform the GM about the V/LA otherwise i wouldn't have pointed this out

This is not only stretching it, but it's also a low blow.

In post 266, Paschendale wrote: Does anyone actually think that TierShift is town?

Raises hand.

In post 266, Paschendale wrote: Empking and Bulba's arguments don't look particularly alignment indicative at all. It looks more like ego than anything useful.

Hold that thought...

In post 266, Paschendale wrote: If either of you have a real argument to make about the other, please make it in a concise manner addressed to town, not just an argument with each other.

But I did. In fact, I think it was you who asked me, and I gave you my case in a concise manner. I've since given my case multiple times. What are you missing?

In post 266, Paschendale wrote: Empking in general looks townier than Bulba, though.

This is interesting. Didn't you just get done saying that the entire exchange was not alignment indicative? What makes Emp, then, look townier? Are you just taking some sort of alignment stance because you feel you should?

The rest of the post can be summed up as "Blah blah blah. I'm suspicious of all of you. Blah blah blah.".

In post 273, Whiskers wrote:I could also go for a cxi lynch. Dunno if he's scum but if he's going to play the whole game contradicting himself, he's a pretty good day 1 lynch.
So let me recap, people I'm currently willing to lynch:
Zekrom
Empking
CXI: MiJelly

Best. Pony. Ever.

@Mod: How many votes does Empking have, and is Whiskers voting somewhere on there?

Rainbowdash · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:27 pm

Bulb... you are the only one voting him. Last VC was three votes, Emp is not voting himself and DF just moved his vote. Only you.

If you are town make yourself useful and actually contribute instead of vote parking on a player that if is actually scum you are incapable of showing such.

Bulbazak · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:30 pm

The VC says that Tier is still voting Emp, which puts him at the same level as Zekrom, who I'm still not totally convinced on, and I don't want to vote Cxin at the moment, as I'd like to enjoy a bit more discussion now that I'm back.

Rainbowdash · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:42 pm

In post 312, Bulbazak wrote:The VC says that Tier is still voting Emp, which puts him at the same level as Zekrom, who I'm still not totally convinced on, and I don't want to vote Cxin at the moment, as I'd like to enjoy a bit more discussion now that I'm back.

What discussion? The entire discussion on Emp was sort of some lazy shift that actually ignored everything you have said.

You have really ignored everything that happened since your V/LA though. Cxi wagon, Ken/Zek moves... you just are continuing to park on Emp. At least last time you parked you actually gave off town tells, this time its nothing.

Bulbazak · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 8:00 pm

I thought I made my thoughts clear in my quick catchup post. I like the Cxin lynch. Nothing really jumps out at me about Ken, although Zen is starting to give me scummy vibes. It almost seems too stupid to be scum, though, so I'm trying to determine if his recent play is a noob tell or a scum tell. I also still find Emp and Pasch incredibly scummy. On top of all that, I've explained why I'm keeping my vote on Emp for the time being. What more were you looking for?

Espeonage · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Sat Jan 18, 2014 8:46 pm

Sorry guys. The VC is now accurate. My sheet went borked. Everything is cool now. Thanks for letting me know.

Maxous · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:39 am

I keep flip-flopping on who is towny-ier and who is scummier between bulb + emp

TierShift · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 am

I think a lynch would improve the quality of this game. Discussion has been stale and taking another 10 days is gonna give us nothing but apathy.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: cxinlee

Paschendale · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:50 am

In post 317, TierShift wrote:I think a lynch would improve the quality of this game. Discussion has been stale and taking another 10 days is gonna give us nothing but apathy.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: cxinlee

PLEASE CAN WE KILL THIS!?!?!

TierShift · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:03 am

Cool why

Absolutely nothing is happening

Aj The Epic · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:11 pm

In post 318, Paschendale wrote:
In post 317, TierShift wrote:I think a lynch would improve the quality of this game. Discussion has been stale and taking another 10 days is gonna give us nothing but apathy.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: cxinlee
PLEASE CAN WE KILL THIS!?!?!

We can wait for tomorrow, right? Cxinlee needs to go more than Tiershift, even if that post did suck as a terrible reason to join this lynch.

Whiskers · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:17 pm

unvote.
vote: cx inlee

cx lewis, claim? reads for us? anything else to consider?

THIS IS

L-1

SO MAKE SURE YOUR HAMMER IS INTENTIONAL.

TierShift · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:04 pm

In post 320, Aj The Epic wrote:
In post 318, Paschendale wrote:
In post 317, TierShift wrote:I think a lynch would improve the quality of this game. Discussion has been stale and taking another 10 days is gonna give us nothing but apathy.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: cxinlee
PLEASE CAN WE KILL THIS!?!?!
We can wait for tomorrow, right? Cxinlee needs to go more than Tiershift, even if that post did suck as a terrible reason to join this lynch.

I voted my long time scumread. I didn't need a good reason to hop on.

The text above my vote was not providing a reason for the vote, it was a damn serious thought that I have. I want this game to get to day 2 asap because it's fucking stale.

As from a guide somewhere:
'Long days benefit town. Even longer days hurt town.'

There's no need to take this to deadline, because it would give nothing more than ending the day soon.

Paschendale · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:24 pm

Unvote

I don't want to see Cx lynched yet, by any means. But I DO want him to say something useful. Cx, I took the vote off, but you're on thin ice and it can easily go back. Step up.

Zekrom25 · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:10 pm

In post 323, Paschendale wrote:
Unvote

I don't want to see Cx lynched yet, by any means. But I DO want him to say something useful. Cx, I took the vote off, but you're on thin ice and it can easily go back. Step up.

As from a guide somewhere:
'Long days benefit town. Even longer days hurt town.'

There's no need to take this to deadline, because it would give nothing more than ending the day soon.

so Paschendale if you are town why do you extend day 1 longer than it needs to be ?