Acfan/Zindie wrote:ignoring that comment...
the best thing to do here, it seems, would either:
a. quicklynch, if we lynch a townie, he can vig kill whoever placed the final vote
b. discuss for at least 15 pages, then lynch.
Did anyone else notice this? I don't understand why it's been dismissed... we just kind of dropped it when everyone went lurkerishly.
Patrick post 89 wrote:I could see a Zindaras/IH group, with probably IH as the GF. The only worrying thing is that implies that my two allies are Twito and Fircoal.
Why, you never stated any reasoning?
Patrick wrote:One thing I didn't like much by acfan was post 49 which could have been a very crude attempt by noobscum to get us to get us to lynch some quickly.
IH voted him for this, then in post 58 made an almost comical attempt to link me to acfan, which may be because he knows acfan would show up scum (presumably goon). He continues to say in a joking manner that acfan is scum, later suggesting to Twito that an acfan/Fircoal pairing may exist.
Enter Zindybuns. Doesn't really mind what IH is doing, calls me town, says that the pairing is Fircoal/Twito. While his reasons make sense in a narrow way, he ignores the context (Twito is almost without internet access, Fircoal always spams up his games). The second he may not have known if he hasn't played with Fircoal, the first he did know. Later calls IH misguided, and pressed the attack on Fircoal and Twito, seeming to show less patience than he did in the last vengeful game where he was town.
Thus, I could see IH/Zindaras, with IH most likely being the GF. Of course, I'm not set on it, and we probably need Twito replacing. I don't have much read on Fircoal either. However, I prefer this theory to the theory that Twito/Fircoal are scum together.
I don't understand why you think this connects us, except for the Venge strategy. Zindy wasn't really being all that hasty either....
Fircoal wrote:Patrick makes a good point in Post 94. A Zindy/IH scum group would make sense, but I don't think there is enough evidence to vote because of it. Also, IH's thoughts on post 94, sounds scumish. What's wrong with throwing out ideas?
Why does it make sense to you? Throwing out ideas and not following through with them is scummy. Why? That way they can see how the town feels, and follow along with them. While I've been reading.... I'm getting a scummeh vibe from Patrick,
look at this.
Patrick wrote:You're pretty desperate there IH? I haven't set anything in stone, and it would be stupid to do so this early. However, I quite clearly stated that I believe Zindaras/IH is more likely than Twito/Fircoal. I believe it is the most likely pairing at this point. Yes, it's useful to see reactions too, but I'm quite clearly laying out my thoughts at this time.
Nothing is set in stone, as it would be stupid?
Patrick in response to post 101 wrote:But seriously IH, are you suggesting I've been more noncommital than anyone else? I've committed to my top 2 suspects and given reasons for my suspicions, and I've added more content than anyone else. What else exactly do you want me to commit to? This sounds like a desperate attempt to discredit your attacker.
and then in another post, he's committed to his top two suspects.
Patrick wrote:Show how I've been noncommital. I stated who my top suspects are. What else do you expect? The reason I made the flippant post about trying to pretend you're pro town is because you are acting in your open 4 manner when you were scum. You're looking for the smallest things you can nitpick on your attacker, hoping to confuse or distract people from the real scum.
Explain. That wasn't a small thing. If you think someone is not as scummy, and is more town,
your vote should not be on them
Fircoal post 114 wrote:I'm more on the IH/Zindy scum group idea.
After some heat on patrick, Fircoal comes up with this.....
He's repeated it about three times...
Ok, I think.... I have been wrong. Zindy is not scum. = )
1)Patrick/Fircoal
2)Fircoal
