VOTE: pasch
Also notice the happy little appeal in his latest post so cuuute
Like what? What caused you to bring up this question?
...what?In post 750, TierShift wrote:Tracking cx is a fucking scumclaim. Cx basically claimed VT when he was willing to selfhammer. If cx is scum there's no way scum would let them do the NK, seeing pasch has suspicions of him.There is no way a tracker would track a scummy player who claimed vt.
pasch did not track cx!
VOTE: pasch
Also notice the happy little appeal in his latest post so cuuute
Well doc, in the last post of yours I quoted, you said that Pasch suspected Cx.In post 757, TierShift wrote:Why the crap would pasch track cx? Hmm?
If even pasch has no idea it's pretty obvious that he's lying.
And besides, Cx had just claimed VT, right? So-- and this is a little WIFOM here-- that's the best time for Cx to do anything... because, following your own logic, nobody would investigate him.In post 758, Whiskers wrote:...why would a tracker not track that player? He doesn't have to catch the kill, you know. Any motion is important.
So you try to attack a town PR, fail, and then come back to me for catching you posturing an attack based on the Emp wagon?In post 762, TierShift wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: bulba
Whiskers, I want to hear what you think of bulba's sudden switch.
Is it you, scum bulba?In post 763, Bulbazak wrote:So you try to attack a town PR, fail, and then come back to me for catching you posturing an attack based on the Emp wagon?In post 762, TierShift wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: bulba
Whiskers, I want to hear what you think of bulba's sudden switch.
I'm already voting youIn post 748, Paschendale wrote:No, I just don't care. You're scum. I don't need to satisfy you in any way.
Whiskers, Cheery, Bulba, let's sort this out and lynch us a scum.
The issue is why RBD was going on about being a confirmable role, when it's well known that he doesn't like town killing roles. (well okay I've been reminded by MD of this fact) It therefore doesn't mean anything. He could also have had a teammate roleblock, but I'd rather not go that far away from occam's razor.In post 751, Dry-fit wrote:The fact no one was poisoned pretty much confirms Pasch is a tracker. Whether he's scum or town is another question. But cx is by no means confirmed town.
It's still possible he is a tracker, but he's certainly not one that's aligned with town.In post 756, Maxous wrote:there's 2 separate players insisting he is not a tracker for weird reasons.
How do you suppose he can conftracker himself? Tracker isn't a confirmable role except to each person individually, what do you plan on doing, no lynching and hoping he continues to perform no kill gambits?In post 761, TierShift wrote:Hmm, I suppose you're right. Still, I find it doubtful that pasch chooses targets whose results are very easy to replicate, when there's quite a few people doubting his claim now. Perhaps he can conftracker himself N3?
Do you even know what that means, TS, or are you just repeating what you saw someone else say?In post 767, TierShift wrote:*cough*occam's razor lol*cough*
Why's that?In post 769, TierShift wrote:A scum tracker is quite a huge assumption, while a town tracker is not.
There's a decent chance that anyone I see using an ability is actually town, rather than scum making a kill or using an ability. Tier right here is trying to use me as a pro-scum role cop to get rid of town PRs. Obviously, if I track someone and the person they visit is dead the next morning, that's a decent guilty result. But Tier isn't making any differentiation. He's just hoping I'll out a doc or something like that.In post 767, TierShift wrote:I think he can conf himself by tracking someone who went somewhere? He's then confirmed to that person and we lynch that person before pasch in all circumstances if that person confirms pasch to be a tracker.
Unless someone is going as far as to suggest a scum tracker *cough*occam's razor lol*cough*
:\In post 772, Dry-fit wrote:@Pasch: Maxous is the person I'm most sure is scum. Him suspecting Emp for "attacking everyone who attacked him" does not read like town reasoning.
Maybe.In post 773, Paschendale wrote:There's a decent chance that anyone I see using an ability is actually town, rather than scum making a kill or using an ability. Tier right here is trying to use me as a pro-scum role cop to get rid of town PRs. Obviously, if I track someone and the person they visit is dead the next morning, that's a decent guilty result. But Tier isn't making any differentiation. He's just hoping I'll out a doc or something like that.