imp notes:- you are scum!!In post 2026, Thesp wrote:Hello all! I'm currently reading start to finish right now. It looks like we have some time at the moment, but I don't expect to waste any with my vote once I've finished reading. I'd appreciate it if there are any points in particular you think I should highlight in my read - let me know. Thanks!
These are all super-shitty votes. Kab's in particular is unimaginably awful. The fact that a wagon happened in one page on me while it took over two weeks to get one locked down on ABR is telling.In post 2021, HighShroomish wrote:*sigh* please don't let this be D1 all over again and have the wagon suddenly dissapear... Please.
VOTE: AEGOR
L-1.
Go fuck yourself.In post 2024, kabooooom wrote: do you have anything to say?? Aegor??
"Floated back and forth" being the operative words.In post 2032, HighShroomish wrote:Okay, so Aegor obviously doesn't give a shit about a wagon forming in one page if it's not on him(as told by the ABR wagon, which floated back and forth but gained a ton of steam over one page).
Not true. I explicitly stated whom I would be willing to lynch. That by definition makes it impossible for me to have sat on any fence.he just sat around doing about as much fence sitting as possible
I did no such thing.and then has a scum read on someone for not fence sitting.
And scum are definitely among them, and RBD is scum for being inconsistent in treatment toward ABR in a clear attempt to defend him. You speak as if you somehow know all of those players are town. Until they have flipped, how can you treat as ridiculous the suggestion that opposition to the ABR wagon was scum-motviated?I could say half the people here were scum for opposing the ABR wagon at any given time, and RBD wanted kab as a better lynch. I would like to lynch this please
My kinda guy.In post 2038, Thesp wrote:"I ain't reading all this stuff, tell me who to vote".
And people have been on and off a wagon for you as well.In post 2033, Aegor wrote:"Floated back and forth" being the operative words.In post 2032, HighShroomish wrote:Okay, so Aegor obviously doesn't give a shit about a wagon forming in one page if it's not on him(as told by the ABR wagon, which floated back and forth but gained a ton of steam over one page).
You were running in circles about who to vote, trying to appease everyone, at least that's what I got from it. You were saying who you would lynch, but even said you were open to other options.Not true. I explicitly stated whom I would be willing to lynch. That by definition makes it impossible for me to have sat on any fence.he just sat around doing about as much fence sitting as possible
You have a scum read on RBD for being adamant about wanting to lynch kab before ABR. Keyword is before, there. You were jumping around, but RBD wasn't.I did no such thing.and then has a scum read on someone for not fence sitting.
Well obviously scum are among them. Why isn't Thor scum for being inconsistent in his treatment of ABR? You speak as if you know all the players are scum. Now we both know that's a lie, so let's not do that, kapeesh? This last part is confusing. Until they have flipped, nobody knows if they are scum or town except themselves. I'm not saying opposition to the ABR wagon was scum-motivated. If you are saying that "opposition was[n't] scum motivated" then no, I'm not saying that either. And again, Thor had opposed an ABR wagon, but so did RBD.And scum are definitely among them, and RBD is scum for being inconsistent in treatment toward ABR in a clear attempt to defend him. You speak as if you somehow know all of those players are town. Until they have flipped, how can you treat as ridiculous the suggestion that opposition to the ABR wagon was scum-motviated?I could say half the people here were scum for opposing the ABR wagon at any given time, and RBD wanted kab as a better lynch. I would like to lynch this please
And your case on me is laughable and you are scummy.
Note that Chevre said within that analysis that ABR is obv scum based on yessiree's death when no one even mentioned that relationship. Also Chevre discredited what Slandaar had said about ABR by referencing Slandaar's self vote and said we should ignore his reads.In post 2040, Thesp wrote:I'm of two minds on Chevre, particularly since I doubt scum would openly discuss the nightkill in such detail like he does here (though I think such discussion is actually a useful tool).
I do not remember RBD actually signing off or advocating an ABR lynch at all, hence my previous comments.In post 2043, HighShroomish wrote:You have a scum read onRBD for being adamant about wanting to lynch kab before ABR. Keyword is before, there. You were jumping around, but RBD wasn't.
Sorry this needs a double post. There was a very good post by one of my replacements about Chevre's exact post.In post 2040, Thesp wrote:I'm of two minds on Chevre, particularly since I doubt scum would openly discuss the nightkill in such detail like he does here (though I think such discussion is actually a useful tool).
The problem with the post is that Chevre made a genuine analysis yet resulted in a WIFOM read. In retrospect with ABR's flip, this is scum.In post 1199, Tony PF wrote:I think it does point to ABR. FMPOV Chèvre only said it was WIFOM, she never said it didn't point to ABR.In post 1191, emeraldemon wrote:@Tony PF
You say you liked Chevre's analysis in 1118, but I thought Chevre concluded that the NK didn't point to ABR. Which part are you agreeing with?
First, it really shouldn't be a surprise that I'm voting you. Second, ABR's wagon grew quickly several times during d2 and d3, d2 especially. It's funny that you just got done trying to discredit yesterday's analysis of the d2 ABR wagon, yet now you're calling the quickness of your own wagon out.In post 2029, Aegor wrote: These are all super-shitty votes. Kab's in particular is unimaginably awful. The fact that a wagon happened in one page on me while it took over two weeks to get one locked down on ABR is telling.
He said that an ABR wagon would provide a lot of information, but he felt there were better lynches out there. I think he even said at one point that it was "an ok lynch".In post 2045, Aegor wrote:I do not remember RBD actually signing off or advocating an ABR lynch at all, hence my previous comments.In post 2043, HighShroomish wrote:You have a scum read onRBD for being adamant about wanting to lynch kab before ABR. Keyword is before, there. You were jumping around, but RBD wasn't.