NY 170: Georgetown II (Game Over)

Thor665 · Post Post #2375 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:14 am

Who, basically, did the same thing to Bulba that Sotty did to ABR - is why I ask.

kabooooom · Post Post #2376 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:39 am

u mean inhim??
yeah..now that u mentioned, he actually is townie. not to forget he called me town and tried ppl to get in ABR wagon.

Thor665 · Post Post #2377 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:45 am

Where did you get your list of acceptable lynches from?

kabooooom · Post Post #2378 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:14 am

pj cos of chevre. rainbow cos she tried to divert ABR wagon to me but unlike aegor (who was like a mad dog shouting "lynch kaboooooooom lynch kabooooom") she looke a bit townie which is what acum would do in my openion. and then there is thesp, who accused me of being scum. i m pretty sure most of you must have thought abt the plot that there is a chance that me and ABR were both scum and it was just a plot so that one of us can get a town read. i have a lot to say about that but lets not get there. thesp would be my first choice. then pj and lastly rainbow.

However, i m 24/7 happy with a aeigor lynch! you can consider him as my zeroth lynch!!

Thor665 · Post Post #2379 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:31 am

What do you think about the logic Emerald used to clear Garmr/Thesp? I happen to agree with it, and he's your top suspect so I would love to hear why it doesn't look reasonable to you as a town case.

kabooooom · Post Post #2380 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:59 am

umm..thats what troubling me. i think bulb just mentioned him to show that he was accusing him. maybe they had decided to come in contact with each other, or something like that. bulb did took his accusations from garmr to emo pretty fast. on top of that ganmar took pretty long amount of time to reply to that matter and only replied when maiestro mention him! and he didnt took long to vote emogul. i dont know if you noticed it or not but bulb tried his best to lynch emogul and when she would have flipped town he would have town read garmr. bulb had his vote for pretty long on emogul wagon even when he was the only one left (as far as i remember) and didnt changed it instantly! i see a similar behavior in thesp. he tried divert a wagon on me with theoretical(like bulb's accusation on emo/garmr). i think it was pretty obvious that i cant be scum cos there were many indirect factors responsible for that me vs. ABR situation to appear. after he failed to built a strong wagon on me he had his vote on me for pretty long time like bulb had on emo. i think thats a scum trait cos i have experienced it! in addition to that his vote on bulb was only cos he had to vote, not cos he wanted to!!

kabooooom · Post Post #2381 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:02 am

theoretical reason*

Thor665 · Post Post #2382 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:09 am

Garmr also hunted fairly aggressively on ABR.

kabooooom · Post Post #2383 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:15 am

maybe. i havent read. thats the reason i keep my reasons with me and dont push anyone i find suspicious. i only have bit of information.

Thor665 · Post Post #2384 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:29 am

Replace out?

kabooooom · Post Post #2385 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:39 am

nop..

Thesp · Post Post #2386 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:42 am

I haven't re-read quite yet, and hopefully will get something substantively posted by tomorrow. My apologies for not hopping on this earlier. I am admittedly having a hard time wrapping my head around this game.

kabooooom · Post Post #2387 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:42 am

btw..how did this conversation started from, "Though what votes made you like PJ as a lynch?" to "replace out?" ??!!

Thor665 · Post Post #2388 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:21 am

In post 2387, kabooooom wrote:btw..how did this conversation started from, "Though what votes made you like PJ as a lynch?" to "replace out?" ??!!

When someone admits to not reading then my presumption is they're admitting to not giving a whit as to the outcome of the game.
If someone gives not a whit then I presume they are a lead weight around the neck of their team.
I presume you are also claiming to be town.
At that stage you are telling me "hey, team mate - I don't care whether you win or not, so I'mma do what I'mma do!"

I do care a whit if we win or lose.
Therefore, I could do without you in the game.

Make sense?

Thor665 · Post Post #2389 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:24 am

In post 2386, Thesp wrote:I haven't re-read quite yet, and hopefully will get something substantively posted by tomorrow. My apologies for not hopping on this earlier. I am admittedly having a hard time wrapping my head around this game.

I'm not sure why - it's not even that wally or spammy.

Aegor · Post Post #2390 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:27 am

Instead of NLing today, we should just lynch kab and then NL tomorrow.

VOTE: Kab

Will review game-yesterday tomorrow or the day after to see if anyone is more worthy than kab.

kabooooom · Post Post #2391 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:33 am

i never said i dont care whether you win or not. and i tried reading this game but its just too much. so i found an quick alternative(watching vote patterns) which i will try after 2 days or so. tell me, what do u think of my answers? u think they r just fluff or did those made any sense(even a bit) at all?

kabooooom · Post Post #2392 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:35 am

In post 2390, Aegor wrote:Instead of NLing today, we should just lynch kab and then NL tomorrow.

VOTE: Kab

Will review game-yesterday tomorrow or the day after to see if anyone is more worthy than kab.

u need a doc!!

kabooooom · Post Post #2393 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:36 am

@aeigor- y do u think there's going to be a NL today??!!

Thor665 · Post Post #2394 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:05 pm

In post 2391, kabooooom wrote:i never said i dont care whether you win or not. and i tried reading this game but its just too much. so i found an quick alternative(watching vote patterns) which i will try after 2 days or so. tell me, what do u think of my answers? u think they r just fluff or did those made any sense(even a bit) at all?

Your answers make sense as a lazy and unhelpful team mate who I would like to replace out.
Do my answers make sense to you?

Replace out?

Thor665 · Post Post #2395 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:06 pm

You've spent enough time on here debating with me to look at some vote counts.
You're not helping my win con.

Sotty7 · Post Post #2396 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:19 pm

So I'm working on the idea that there is three scum which means we have one more lynch to win. Why would we no lynch today when we basically have to mislynch a bunch of times to lose now? Admittedly I'm terrible at the game math, but at this point surely we just lynch until we find the scum. If the math strongly points away from this then let me know, but I'm currently not interested in a no lynch at all.

So when I spoke about the timing of the PJ Rainbow vote, I just felt at the time that it was almost a pivotal vote looking to swing momentum the other way. Looking back I see suspicion from PJ on Rainbow but it all just feels pretty weak to me. I was probably overly harsh but I'm just not moved by any of his posting so far. His opening day suspicions still on me and Rainbow seems extremely contrived, waiting to see what his re-read draws out.

Thor665 · Post Post #2397 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:28 pm

I actually thought his appearance looked fine, and the progression sensible. It's only in light of flips that it looks a bit skeevier.
I'll agree with you that still having Rainbow as a top suspect...eh, not such a fan.

HighShroomish · Post Post #2398 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:51 pm

@kabooooom we have 10 people. If we lynch and scum NK's, we have a 4 person MYLO. I would prefer a No-Lynch now to a No-Lynch with what is probably going to be a very WIFOMy group of 4. Unless scum just decides to be an asshole.
But I don't want a No-Lynch today. Maybe tomorrow. Probably the day after though.

Thor665 · Post Post #2399 (ISO) » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:59 pm

In post 2398, HighShroomish wrote:@kabooooom we have 10 people. If we lynch and scum NK's, we have a 4 person MYLO. I would prefer a No-Lynch now to a No-Lynch with what is probably going to be a very WIFOMy group of 4. Unless scum just decides to be an asshole.
But I don't want a No-Lynch today. Maybe tomorrow. Probably the day after though.

Allow me to explain why this is silly.

Your fear is that we will get to a bad 4 person MYLO.

Hint: we will get to a bad MYLO because scum will shoot town seeming players.
Additional Hint: No lynching does not mean scum will suddenly go "hey, guys, let's shoot a scummy looking player!"
Third Hint: A no Lynch at 4p MYLO is *just* as effective for narrowing the pool as a No Lynch today, or yesterday. Whoop-dee-doo.
Fourth Hint: Town who wants scum kills to help them out...are kinda derpy.

That said, you appear to want to lynch someone today - this pleases me.
But stop pretending like it's somehow good strategy to no lynch 'just because of numbers'.
Even if I didn't think PJ was scum I'd still think that was poor advice.