Antihero 67 wrote:so i couldn't have been that unclear.
Fair enough, but when someone asks someone else to elaborate on something, it grinds my gears when they blow them off like that. Then again, insanity was already on the wagon with you, so I guess I can't be too critical of you here.
Antihero 68 wrote:wait a second... i thought you just finished telling me that mala's questioning was all good in the neighborhood and i'm the one who's being unclear and huffing the dipshit glue.
I think she asked a fair question. I don't necessarily think it was anything super insightful. I was more perturbed at your response than I was enthralled with her question. In any case, what I meant to tell Egg was that I ultimately agree with him and that Mala looks more town for it than not.
---
Egg 69 wrote:Redcoyote, nah I'm pretty sure that's what Lucky was trying to do. Looked like an "lolreactions" post.
Are you intending to follow up on it? Do you want to know if others feel the same way?
Egg 71 wrote:I wouldn't use the word "mean", but even if I would, that would make the point I'm trying to make.
I may have been being just a touch facetious.
---
Wolfy 75 wrote:So "scrambling" to defend oneself is scummy?
Not necessarily, but, as I explained to Egg, that's not why I chose to vote you.
I don't understand why you quoted that line but you didn't read and/or comment on the line a bit further down where I answered your question as to why
19 was scummy.
---
jklash 82 wrote:I don't think that someone would think this much about their trolling to point where they are self conscious and feel to go over the top.
Scum would.
jklash 85 wrote:It sounds like some of you have played with antihero before, can someone tell me if this type/tone of posting is typical of him?
Honestly, he seems like a different player everytime I play with him. I would call this atypical, but I think he's pretty good about not conforming to one set style.