Assuming this was addressed to me, and not T S O, I don't think this applies to me. Probably because being the largest wagon at the moment, my name is coming up all the time anyway. It's gotten to a point where just looking for posts with my name in them when I'm in a rush leads me to glancing at most of the posts anyway.In post 197, Egg wrote:That's twice you've popped back up as soon as someone says your name.
Mini 1568: Another Awesome Alliteration Adventure (over)
-
-
Cho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 5, 2014
-
-
The Betting Pool Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 470
- Joined: January 7, 2014
omg... you have to read posts in the game? how dare we!?In post 200, Cho wrote:
Assuming this was addressed to me, and not T S O, I don't think this applies to me. Probably because being the largest wagon at the moment, my name is coming up all the time anyway. It's gotten to a point where just looking for posts with my name in them when I'm in a rush leads me to glancing at most of the posts anyway.In post 197, Egg wrote:That's twice you've popped back up as soon as someone says your name.-
-
Cho
-
-
Egg Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: December 16, 2010
-
-
Cho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 5, 2014
Oh, I'm sorry, that was just me being struck speechless by your shameless misrepresentation.In post 202, Cho wrote:
Preview edit:
Egg, I was lurking prior to 144. We've already discussed this.
My burst in posting now is because I have the time to do so, as opposed to my inactivity prior to 177.-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
C'mon this is stupid. I am scumreading neither you nor Cho (as I said for both).T S O wrote:Catching up tonight; the justification that you don't like me "flaming" and so you ...won't lynch scum is actively playing against your win condition.
I also stated that I don't agree with your "case" on Cho.
The only thing that I said me not liking you flaming was a reason for was not discussing that at length.
Way to misrep.still the same old MTD-
-
Cho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 5, 2014
-
-
Riptide Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 183
- Joined: April 13, 2014
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Her reaction to being pushed seemed genuine to me, but yeah, much of it is gut and the absence of a reason why IIn post 207, Riptide wrote:MTD - Is there something specific about Cho that doesn't make you want to lynch her? Or is it just gut?wouldwant to lynch her.still the same old MTD-
-
Jargonaut Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 383
- Joined: February 2, 2014
I never said meta was the biggest part of my argument against TSO. However, seeing as a lot of people have stated that he plays in a similar manner all the time, I'm doubting whether my initial read was very good.In post 183, Cho wrote:On a related note:
Jargonaut, why isyourvote still on T S O? You haven't mentioned him
I don't particularly like your posts either, looking at your ISO.
You had one important point about T S O's meta. Then quite a while back in post 87, you actually said"I'm retracting the meta part of my argument."But thn you immediately follow that up with"That said, you're still my biggest suspect, so I'm keeping my vote on you."It looks scummy to me in that most of your argument for T S O being scum stemmed from your meta read, but in that post it feels like you're scrambling for a reason to stay on the wagon.
You haven't mentioned or addressed T S O since.
158 is asking for Elyse to say what stands out about Riptide.
172 just feels awkward and much too detached.
What I'm getting here is a lot of evenly-spaced posts to look active, yet simultaneously remaining very detached from the main conversation regarding my wagon and from the game in general. In fact, those last two posts are just focused on whatever's going on between Elyse and Riptide. Sure, you're occasionally instigating conversation between them or from them regarding each other, but what is your actual stance on it?
So actually, you're right in that my vote on TSO doesn't make a lot of sense anymore.
UNVOTE:
Oh, and I asked Elyse that question because she's my strongest town read at the moment, and I honestly cannot read hydras at all yet.
I'll try to find some more time tonight/tomorrow to read ISOs, because I've been checking from my phone for the most part and I think I've missed a lot.-
-
Riptide Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 183
- Joined: April 13, 2014
Does it not bother you that she basically contradicted herself on her TSO read? Also, doesn't it bother you that she tried to pass lurking off as town?In post 208, MTD wrote:
Her reaction to being pushed seemed genuine to me, but yeah, much of it is gut and the absence of a reason why IIn post 207, Riptide wrote:MTD - Is there something specific about Cho that doesn't make you want to lynch her? Or is it just gut?wouldwant to lynch her.-
-
Riptide
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
How so? Not seeing it.In post 210, Riptide wrote:Does it not bother you that she basically contradicted herself on her TSO read?
Not really seeing this either. She showed a possible town motivation for it, didn't say that it was a towny thing to do.Also, doesn't it bother you that she tried to pass lurking off as town?
Generally speaking, lurking is null.still the same old MTD-
-
T S O Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16301
- Joined: February 11, 2013
Yes, it is, and if you want to continue the comparison you would then suddenly not appear on the T/S list.In post 135, Burning_Earth wrote: Basically Cho exhibited strong town reads. She used the word 'unlynchable' as strong town reads shouldn't be lynched. It is, I admit, a little odd to include herself within they 'unlynchable' pile, but is it really that different to putting yourself at the very top of a T/S list?
This is such a terrible way of justifying Cho's actions. I don't know why you're wasting your time with this guff other than some ridiculous innate need to go against my opinions.In post 135, Burning_Earth wrote:
A: She was right, RVS was over. Don't know what you're getting at.
B: Oh come on, everyone uses strong language early game. I didn't really want to lynch egg when I voted him, I just scum read him mildly. The same with cho making out her townreads as stronger than they really were
C: see B
Maybe RVS was over; I'm not scumreading her for believing it, but it shows that she's already following Elyse blindly.
I've said before, though, that my main problem isn't even the term of Unlynchable. It's the backtracking after, the regressing of the reads in that section and regression of criteria needed to leave them, to be wordy.
This is a great example of you not actually reading my posts, but skimming and seeing what you think you should see.
OMGUS. Is. Not. A. Town. Tell. This is a really, really bad meta which is starting to spread around the site and I hate it so much. OMGUS is the easiest thing for scum to do under pressure, as well as the most likely. OMGUS is a definite scumtell. There's a strong difference between Town OMGUS and Scum. Hers is undoubtedly scum; her reasoning is she doesn't like me/I'm scumreading her. Not Town, no no, bad Burning_Earth.In post 135, Burning_Earth wrote: I retract my statement that this point was OMGUS. In fact, cho was OMGUSing. However, that is a reasonable town tell, not a scum tell. Scum know not to OMGUS like that.
Lurking after sustained pressure, however, is scummy as it gets.In post 135, Burning_Earth wrote:Lurking is null and you know it.
So you don't have any real reason for voting me, in other words.In post 144, Cho wrote: T S O is anullleaningI-hope-you-are-scumread for me.
My vote is still on him because I don't like unnecessarily mean people.
No, you weren't.In post 144, Cho wrote:I was lurking out the pressure like a true townfuck.
Confirmation bias implies I'm scum. Apparently you're not calling me scum. Which is it?In post 144, Cho wrote:It's also depressing to try and fight off a lynch when certain people are determined to use every new post you make as a way to further their confirmation bias.
Alternatively, to me, you can't respond because it's all true, and then you act like it's unbelievable I'm still calling you scum.In post 144, Cho wrote:I am aware T S O posted a "case" that apparently proves that I am scum.
I'm not responding because anything I say will just give him more "ammunition".
I didn't like it either, but it's not particularly scummy.In post 156, Elyse wrote:Didn't like Cho's most recent post but I don't know if it's necessarily scummy.
It doesn't alleviate my read, though.
That's great and all, I guess.In post 166, Elyse wrote: @TSO: You're dumb, but almost certainly town.
Oh you.In post 174, Dunhamganger wrote:B_E testing the mod's tolerance for slightly sub-TSO behavior I see.
You can't read me and you don't like my behaviour, so you're voting me.In post 181, Cho wrote: Where did I say that I won't lynch scum? I like my vote on you because not only is trying to read you...polarizing... but I don't particularly like your behavior either.
How many explanations have you given for your vote on me now? You can't read me, you don't like my behaviour, I'm trying to run the game, more ...it's remarkable.
Who are these people, Cho?In post 181, Cho wrote:You may be a null read for me now, but I'm ok with my vote because you still could be overaggressive Scum, according to what people have said about your playstyle.
Well, your lurking suggests you can't.In post 183, Cho wrote: I like to think I can deal with regular tunneling.
I agree with this. Although I didn't lash out at people for disagreeing with me (I haven't attacked Elyse, I attacked Burning for laziness and rudeness) your voting of me for scumreading you is something I have said I don't accept.In post 183, Cho wrote:Lashing out at anyone who tried to tell you that you're wrong- I'm less inclined to accept.
And I haven't picked on everything you've said, so this is true, but you have told me and the game a whole load of scummy stuff and your explanations don't add up whatsoever for the majority of them.In post 183, Cho wrote:It's not like everything Scum say is textbook-scummy.
So you're bowing to pressure in not scumreading me, because you stand out by scumreading me, then.In post 183, Cho wrote:And it's not like everything Town does is "by the book". I've been hoping this whole time that your blind aggression comes from Scum for sanity's sake, but with so many people saying you read as Town, I want to be stubborn with my read but I know I need to concede in some way at some point or another. So you're Null for now.
And they say I'm dramatising this case.
Explain how your read transitioned from T -> S -> T to me, Elyse.In post 188, Elyse wrote: Also I'm back to townreading Cho.
THANK YOU, EGG.In post 193, Egg wrote: Cho's disappearance is pretty bad. It's pretty common for scum to feel pressure and fade into the background until someone else does something scummy. Her admission of this doesn't make it a town thing to do by the way.-
-
Riptide Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 183
- Joined: April 13, 2014
@MTDIn post 144, Cho wrote:a)I really want to bring myself to scumread him
i)but I reluctantly think he is town for the blind aggression
1)and yet I am also leaning toward scumreading him because I know he can be hyperaggressive to form a façade of towniness when he is scum.
a)T S O is anullleaningI-hope-you-are-scumread for me.
b)My vote is still on him because I don't like unnecessarily mean people.
4)I was lurking out the pressure like a true townfuck.-
-
T S O Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16301
- Joined: February 11, 2013
BUT BUTIn post 204, Cho wrote:Egg, I was lurking prior to 144. We've already discussed this.
My burst in posting now is because I have the time to do so, as opposed to my inactivity prior to 177.
YOU LITERALLY JUST SAID YOU WERE LURKING TO REMOVE PRESSURE
INACTIVITY WAS NEVER MENTIONED ONCE
The feel I got, and still get, was like Burning_Earth:In post 205, MTD wrote:
C'mon this is stupid. I am scumreading neither you nor Cho (as I said for both).T S O wrote:Catching up tonight; the justification that you don't like me "flaming" and so you ...won't lynch scum is actively playing against your win condition.
I also stated that I don't agree with your "case" on Cho.
The only thing that I said me not liking you flaming was a reason for was not discussing that at length.
Way to misrep.
"Hmm, I don't really want to analyze and potentially change my stance, will I be open to this case? Naaah."
It's not particularly scummy to do that, but it is a bit irritating for me.
What are you using this as an excuse for again?In post 206, Cho wrote:I was brought up to speak when spoken to, except for when clubbing or hide-and-seek is involved.
You can be Town just for this. I don't even care.In post 210, Riptide wrote: Does it not bother you that she basically contradicted herself on her TSO read? Also, doesn't it bother you that she tried to pass lurking off as town?
I've tried to be sarcastic to this remark but even my broad and nuanced sarcasm cannot fluently express just how unbelievable I find it you don't see this.In post 212, MTD wrote:
How so? Not seeing it.In post 210, Riptide wrote:Does it not bother you that she basically contradicted herself on her TSO read?
I challenge you to find me a viable action which does not have a potential town motivation. Go on.In post 212, MTD wrote:
Not really seeing this either. She showed a possible town motivation for it, didn't say that it was a towny thing to do.Also, doesn't it bother you that she tried to pass lurking off as town?
Generally speaking, lurking is null.-
-
T S O Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16301
- Joined: February 11, 2013
Two things before I go:
1) The argument that I can't specifically find scum motivation in an action, therefore it is not scummy, is full of holes. Firstly, not all scum posts have scum motivation: hell, often they can have Town motivations, in various situations. Secondly, though when you can't find any Town motivation but you can't find Scum motivation either, you don't just drop it. Town motivation should be far clearer than Scum motivation; lack of the former should be quite worrying, regardless of the presence of the latter.
2) I am not aggressive as either alignment; I am somewhat aggressive in Newbies as Scum and as Town. That's it. If someone is calling me scum for aggression, show me my meta. I know it better than you, but it's possible I'm wrong.-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
T S O Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16301
- Joined: February 11, 2013
-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
->null read, as it was laterIn post 214, Riptide wrote:
@MTDIn post 144, Cho wrote:a)I really want to bring myself to scumread him
i)but I reluctantly think he is town for the blind aggression
1)and yet I am also leaning toward scumreading him because I know he can be hyperaggressive to form a façade of towniness when he is scum.
a)T S O is anullleaningI-hope-you-are-scumread for me.
b)My vote is still on him because I don't like unnecessarily mean people.
4)I was lurking out the pressure like a true townfuck.
->context! Direct reply to
So T S O said: "Scum motivation!", she said "Town motivation!"In post 120, T S O wrote:she's lurking out the pressure like a true scumfuck.still the same old MTD-
-
Riptide Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 183
- Joined: April 13, 2014
She said that he was town for blind aggression. She also said he leans scum because of his aggression. Either this is a contradiction or fence sitting disguised in wording.In post 219, MTD wrote:
->null read, as it was laterIn post 214, Riptide wrote:
@MTDIn post 144, Cho wrote:a)I really want to bring myself to scumread him
i)but I reluctantly think he is town for the blind aggression
1)and yet I am also leaning toward scumreading him because I know he can be hyperaggressive to form a façade of towniness when he is scum.
a)T S O is anullleaningI-hope-you-are-scumread for me.
b)My vote is still on him because I don't like unnecessarily mean people.
4)I was lurking out the pressure like a true townfuck.
->context! Direct reply to
So T S O said: "Scum motivation!", she said "Town motivation!"In post 120, T S O wrote:she's lurking out the pressure like a true scumfuck.
Still. Lurking is not town. Ever. (Unless you get in PRs, which is different, and I'm not getting in to)-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
Fair enough, but that's still lurking...In post 218, T S O wrote:But it's not lurking, it's lurking under pressure!
Srsly, though, I think she made it quite clear why she would do that as town, and I have to say that is something I can buy into, given the playstate at that point, although it is not something I would do and she didn't really help herself by it.
@Cho: mind telling us whose alt you are? If you already did I missed that.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
What? don't you ever have arguments for scum and for town on a person?In post 220, Riptide wrote:She said that he was town for blind aggression. She also said he leans scum because of his aggression. Either this is a contradiction or fence sitting disguised in wording.
Already said that, lurking is null.Still. Lurking is not town. Ever. (Unless you get in PRs, which is different, and I'm not getting in to)
Arguably lurking under pressure, as TSO said, may in general be more probably scum, not sure about that though.still the same old MTD-
-
MTD Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: November 27, 2013
-
-
Egg Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: December 16, 2010
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-