In post 97, insanity018 wrote:
p-edit: Wolfy, do you think RVS trolling humour is more likely to be a scum or town thing? And, am I also overreacting? Or do you think that is just Anti and Arc?
I think RVS trolling humour is a null thing.
No, you are not over-reacting.
It's obviously hard to read "tone" in a forum post but there was a certain "tone" in Arc's post which at the time I took as an over-reaction.
I have since has a change of heart and mind - i.e. I have had a look back at other posts/games and the "tone" I picked up is a frequent part of her play whatever her alignment.
In post 95, Malakittens wrote:
It's interesting how you pointed out you haven't answered any of them. So why don't you care to enlighten us and answer them.
Answers in bold.
What the hell are you talking about?
I'm talking about arc and anti over-reacting and teaming up on lucky's attempt at RVS trolling humour
I was reaction testing from lucky's post which i have explained already. So if Anti back's me up means that makes me scum?
No. But I certainly got a reaction.
so what about Anti?
What about Anti?
Are you suppose to be voting Anti becuz he backed me up and my vote on lucky came first?
Don't understand this sentence.
Why me?
Had to be somebody. Why not you?
Are you sure your flip-flop of the read wasn't influenced by my current read on that slot?
Yes. I am sure. I re-read it and just thought this is more likely to be a town response than a scum response.
I wouldn't respond that aggressively as scum (I probably wouldn't as town either!)
If so why *can't* her response be from scum? Why is it more likely to come from town?
In post 97, insanity018 wrote:
p-edit: Wolfy, do you think RVS trolling humour is more likely to be a scum or town thing? And, am I also overreacting? Or do you think that is just Anti and Arc?
I think RVS trolling humour is a null thing.
No, you are not over-reacting.
It's obviously hard to read "tone" in a forum post but there was a certain "tone" in Arc's post which at the time I took as an over-reaction.
I have since has a change of heart and mind - i.e. I have had a look back at other posts/games and the "tone" I picked up is a frequent part of her play whatever her alignment.
What about the questions you ignored in my posts. I didn't team up with Anti. Anti agreed with somepoint i said and you labled it as that we were teaming up and you voted me but not "Anti". I was reaction testing and Anti joined. Per your logical point of view.. you should be voting Anti not me. Your explainations still are not fitting well.
insanity 97 wrote:Do you think that Lucky is doing this?
Hard to say. As I mentioned earlier, I think Antihero makes a good point against him, but I'm not yet sold on Lucky being scum. I could see Lucky in either light right now.
In post 104, ArcAngel9 wrote:
What about the questions you ignored in my posts. I didn't team up with Anti. Anti agreed with somepoint i said and you labled it as that we were teaming up and you voted me but not "Anti". I was reaction testing and Anti joined. Per your logical point of view.. you should be voting Anti not me. Your explainations still are not fitting well.
I could only vote for 1 of you. I didn't know you were reaction testing so had no reason to prefer Anti over you.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 97, insanity018 wrote:
p-edit: Wolfy, do you think RVS trolling humour is more likely to be a scum or town thing? And, am I also overreacting? Or do you think that is just Anti and Arc?
I think RVS trolling humour is a null thing.
You are correct sir. I have trolled as scum and town before. I'm surprised people are trying to classify it and even more surprised that people think I am so good at trolling that I have agenda's underlying in my trolling.
I am fine with your three options Red. So long as it's actually insanity or wolfy
The bunny knight reigns supreme!
Get to know me! Here! and now Here too!
Yeah, I mean, Wolfy is my number 1 right now. Those that are advocating insanity/Lucky (or anyone else) aren't doing enough to get me over to their camp, so my vote is going to stay where it is for the time being.
In post 115, RedCoyote wrote:Yeah, I mean, Wolfy is my number 1 right now. Those that are advocating insanity/Lucky (or anyone else) aren't doing enough to get me over to their camp, so my vote is going to stay where it is for the time being.
Glad to be someone's number 1. So my RVS attempt at humour makes me scum. Interesting. I assume we're still taking about 19 as your whole case?
I wasn't
trying
to appear townie. I am town and was just having a bit of fun while we were still in RVS... unless you're telling me now that we were out of RVS by post 19?
In post 116, Egg wrote:Can you remind me of the Wolfy case? I'll sheep it later if I like it.
No idea. Not enough posting or active scum hunting - including from me.
I wil try and find more time later to dig deeper, ask questions and post some reads. I expect the word
I'm leaning scum on RedCoyote - mostly because I know I'm town and the reasons he gives for me being scummy (big if, smiley, sucking up to Mala!) are weak. They are all null. They give no indication of alignment and only scum would try and get alignment from them.
And,
because
I'm leaning scum on RedCoyote I'm leaning scum on Malakittens too.
Mostly because of:
In post 15, RedCoyote wrote:Don't vote Mala! She's too good to lose if she's town.
but it would be fairly ballsy to post that about one's scum partner...
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
