Mafia v. Wolves Redux: Finally Over!

[Battle Mage]

if you'd bothered to read, you would see that this has already been clarified-twice.

BM, if you bothered to read, MoS meant Kison when he said Raffles.

I think you mean Kison...?

Err, yea. Sorry.

[Mastermind of Sin]

what does Raffles have to do with this?
you seem pretty over-protective of him, especially considering I DIDNT EVEN MENTION HIM.

[Kison]

Battle Mage, the fact that you are trying to retaliate against a response to your lack of attention span is sad in itself. The fact that you are wrong about it, however, is even more saddening.

First Clarification

I think you mean Kison...?

You Not Paying Attention

what does Raffles have to do with this?

Second Clarification - First Response To Your Question

BM, if you bothered to read, MoS meant Kison when he said Raffles.

I think you mean Kison...?

Err, yea. Sorry.

No other response had anything to do with clarifying who MoS referred to.

Thanks for sidetracking the discussion.

[Mastermind of Sin]

I think he's making it his mission in life.

[IH]

Right now, I'm worried about where my vote is because Shanba placed his on DGB as well. It doesn't mean both of them can't be scum. It's just less likely. I also didn't like being accused of Role-Fishing XReyoX and would like an explaination.

This is just plain outright not true. Distancing/Bussing ftw.

If you are not Shanba, then I don't care what you would've done in the same spot. If you are Shanba, then why are you playing two roles in a single game?

MoS, he just finished a game with Shanba. I believe he's metagaming.

FoS:MoS

I didn't like how in his posts about Shanba and Akbar, he seemed to defend Shanba in a more roundabout way than I really thought was necessay.

Unvote, Vote:BattleMage

Seriously.

I'll comment on Shanba's post after this one.

[IH]

Battle Mage feels off to me. Most games I've seen him in (as pro-town) he's got an idea in his head and run with it bullheaded through any walls like common sense or proof that he's wrong that might stand in his way. This game he's much more opportunistic and widening his horizons, which is something I want to watch.

This is most definitely true. I agree.

I thought this post was going to be much larger.

I'm going to actually

FoS:Anyone who was being suspicious of Shanba's opening post

, which was clearly a reread.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Right now, I'm worried about where my vote is because Shanba placed his on DGB as well. It doesn't mean both of them can't be scum. It's just less likely. I also didn't like being accused of Role-Fishing XReyoX and would like an explaination.

This is just plain outright not true. Distancing/Bussing ftw.

If you are not Shanba, then I don't care what you would've done in the same spot. If you are Shanba, then why are you playing two roles in a single game?

MoS, he just finished a game with Shanba. I believe he's metagaming.

FoS:MoS

I didn't like how in his posts about Shanba and Akbar, he seemed to defend Shanba in a more roundabout way than I really thought was necessay.

Is it a crime to be creative in your responses to people?

[Battle Mage]

@Kison-the fact is your input was really unnecessary. considering it was apparent that all involved parties had resolved the issue.
BM

[Kison]

@Kison-the fact is your input was really unnecessary. considering it was apparent that all involved parties had resolved the issue.
BM

How was your input at the top of this page any more necessary? Thanks for continuing to distract.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Yea, Kison's got you on this one. You can't put this on him.

[Battle Mage]

too late, i already did. 2 wrongs dont make a right. try and stay on-topic from now on

Yea, Kison's got you on this one. You can't put this on him.

[Mastermind of Sin]

You

tried

to do it...and failed miserably

[Battle Mage]

too late, i already did. 2 wrongs dont make a right.

try and stay on-topic from now on

Yea, Kison's got you on this one. You can't put this on him.

you not paying attention? i bolded it for you.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Actually, I think I'm right on topic. Your constant attempts at craplogic and trying to bulldoze error and responsbility off of yourself and onto other people is starting to get really counterproductive. You're not helping the town at all, so why should we keep you around?

FoS: Battle Mage

[Battle Mage]

you criticise me for error, yet it was your errors that started the whole conversation.
you criticise me for crap logic, yet you are the one who professes lynching a player based on their ability, not their affiliation.
The irony is killing me!

Actually, I think I'm right on topic. Your constant attempts at craplogic and trying to bulldoze error and responsbility off of yourself and onto other people is starting to get really counterproductive. You're not helping the town at all, so why should we keep you around?

FoS: Battle Mage

[Mastermind of Sin]

you criticise me for error, yet it was your errors that started the whole conversation.
you criticise me for crap logic, yet you are the one who professes lynching a player based on their ability, not their affiliation.
The irony is killing me!

Actually, I think I'm right on topic. Your constant attempts at craplogic and trying to bulldoze error and responsbility off of yourself and onto other people is starting to get really counterproductive. You're not helping the town at all, so why should we keep you around?

FoS: Battle Mage

I took responsbility for my error and apologized. You continually try to shift responsibility off yourself to make it look like someone else is at fault.

To be honest, regardless of alignment, you are being detrimental to the town. We're getting nothing done because we have to deal with your idiotic comments. Even

if

you are protown, we have a better chance of winning the game if you're dead. The scum can take advantage of you and use you as a distraction to hide from the town and keep us from lynching correctly. We're better of lynching you now instead of leaving you alive to lose the game for us later. And that's only

if

you are protown, which I'm starting to doubt. I find it hard to believe that a person can be this illogical without having some sort of agenda.

[DrippingGoofball]

Wow, MoS, that was uncalled for. I don't think BM is detrimental to the town. I have not found his comments to be "idiotic" and I wouldn't want to see him lynched unless I thought he was scum.

In fact, I concur with BM's comment in post 814 above.

Please end this silly argument. It's silly, silly, you hear? Silly.

[Battle Mage]

same old crap arguments. im beginning to doubt that your experience has taught you alot about this game, as you seem to have neglected the basic principles. if you think im that idiotic, by all means ignore me, or, failing that quit the game. you could even invest in a stress-ball for us when you read my comments. However, such an attitude is CERTAINLY going to be detrimental to the town, as it means we lose the majority of your contribution to the game. Still, im happy to sacrifice that, if it means that your comments stick to the actual game. If you want to criticise my logic, be specific and relevant, otherwise just set up a:
"I HATEZ BATLE MAGEE" thread in Mish Mash
believe me, its the latest craze.
NOW, can we get back on topic?
BM

you criticise me for error, yet it was your errors that started the whole conversation.
you criticise me for crap logic, yet you are the one who professes lynching a player based on their ability, not their affiliation.
The irony is killing me!

Actually, I think I'm right on topic. Your constant attempts at craplogic and trying to bulldoze error and responsbility off of yourself and onto other people is starting to get really counterproductive. You're not helping the town at all, so why should we keep you around?

FoS: Battle Mage

I took responsbility for my error and apologized. You continually try to shift responsibility off yourself to make it look like someone else is at fault.

To be honest, regardless of alignment, you are being detrimental to the town. We're getting nothing done because we have to deal with your idiotic comments. Even

if

you are protown, we have a better chance of winning the game if you're dead. The scum can take advantage of you and use you as a distraction to hide from the town and keep us from lynching correctly. We're better of lynching you now instead of leaving you alive to lose the game for us later. And that's only

if

you are protown, which I'm starting to doubt. I find it hard to believe that a person can be this illogical without having some sort of agenda.

[Mr. Flay]

Trust me on this, MoS: Battle Mage can be that annoying in any game situation, it may have nothing to do with a hidden agenda. Ask Stoofer after the game is over.

That said, BM's craplogic doesn't help us today, but I still prefer Raffles for today's lynch. Where is everyone else?

[Battle Mage]

man, this is getting increasingly like a conspiracy against me here...
i have only played 1 game with Stoofer, which has finished, so there is no reason not to say anything. If it is the game i am thinking of, i cannot see what you are getting at however.
BM

Trust me on this, MoS: Battle Mage can be that annoying in any game situation, it may have nothing to do with a hidden agenda. Ask Stoofer after the game is over.

That said, BM's craplogic doesn't help us today, but I still prefer Raffles for today's lynch. Where is everyone else?

[DrippingGoofball]

I'm not finding BM annoying. The guy is fine.

But more to the point, despite the fact that Flay's argument is convincing, Raffles' response to me leads to be believe that in this particular instance, a particularly clever argument may lead to the wrong decision being taken. Raffles wasn't overly defensive, and he struck me as earnest. I dunno. Maybe he's a good actor.

[Kison]

This debate is still going on?

*smack Battle Mage*

[Mastermind of Sin]

I'm not finding BM annoying. The guy is fine.

But more to the point, despite the fact that Flay's argument is convincing, Raffles' response to me leads to be believe that in this particular instance, a particularly clever argument may lead to the wrong decision being taken. Raffles wasn't overly defensive, and he struck me as earnest. I dunno. Maybe he's a good actor.

Because scum

have

to be overly defensive, right?

[DrippingGoofball]

Because scum

have

to be overly defensive, right?

They often are, they often are. But as I wrote. Raffles also struck me as earnest. Again - I might be wrong. But that's how I see it.

[Mastermind of Sin]

I hope you appreciate the WIFOM-ness of that statement.