In post 1880, SpyreX wrote:
STD's response to Zor was less playing the game and more defusing the bomb. Now, I'm the position of knowing Zor was town so its easier to see but a reread of that interaction knowing that makes it stand out.
Damn. You caught me.
My post recognizing that the way people were treating your predecessor's post as pro-town when it seemed pretty clearly independant of alignment, thus presenting people from misreading the slot, when in fact I was not the first to post such a thing since CES posted the same point and people seemed to ignore it, is clearly the most damning piece of evidence in this thread and identifies me as the scummiest person in the town, thus worthy of your vote.
GG I concede.
----
In post 1888, DrippingGoofball wrote:
It's based on a random distribution of scum on wagons, and excuse me, but there are always a few scums on a typical team that wagon hard.
This is the initial assumption that you are making, which if untrue, pretty much debunks your entire scumputer and it becomes nothing more than a giant program for counting how many wagons people attended (for instance, myself and ABR seem to have ended up at the top, while MBL seems to be on the bottom. Shocker...and don't be like "well, look at Seol/Bookitty!" because it doesn't really matter since who knows what your voodoo magic system is going to bring out but it looks strongly corrilated between wagons and points.)
If you think I'm way off base, plug in UT to your scumputer and tell me if it determines if UT is scum or town.
My doubt comes from the fact that if you were scum you probably would have just been like "STD's on top, vote!" but you didn't (then again that might be too unsubtle). But...then you polled the town to see if that was a valid option and got a couple of "nays," so you're content to try these cute little potshots saying "you know I'm town, don't you?"
The conclusion I'm drawing is that this is just riduculous, it is NOT science just because you say it is, it is probablity with an assumption that is debatable. I hope that no one gives into this craziness just because it exists and may have "worked" in the past. If DGB is town it's relatively unhelpful and if DGB is scum it is pretty much useless.
This is the EXACT same thing as what you did yesterday with your "mathcam I found a cop with a guilty on you!"
You say something absolutely absurd, catch someone responding and saying that because they were flustered (or rather, that they responded not in the EXACT way that they're apparently supposed to according to you) they're obvscum.
How the heck does this even work when you're town? I assume you MUST do this when town because otherwise I don't know why you're still alive. I'm assuming that you don't have a heap of votes on you because everyone's like "oh, that's just how she plays." I am baffled that people went from "I'm suspicious of DGB" to "oh, good analysis DGB" in one post that was basically a post you regurgitated and I curse all the scum that likely took CTD's life in this game, as he was a vote against you.
I'm trying not to get trapped by your playstyle, but focusing on how you are using it. From that vantage point it seems pretty clear to me what you are doing. If you really are town and I'm caught then I would be astonished. I do not plan on removing my vote baring something drastic, because this is getting tiresome.
I refuse to further indulge in this distracting farce, which is really just another tally mark in the total number of distracting farces you have done this entire game. (If you tried really hard you could probably bait me into responding, but I'm going to do my best to resist the urge).
