In post 1321, TheAdrienC wrote:*blinks*
He BLINKED!
Hammer him, boys!
In post 1323, Alina wrote:So...your angle is "Sorry for being scummy, I'm reaction testing!" now? I think Wake already did that.
In post 1330, Boonskiies wrote:He wants to lynch Hunterseeker for reasons other than that mafia count slip up
and he hammered Clusk, after not once having voted him. Sure, he outright said he would hammer him
but the fact that he did it with no hesitation, to someone who flipped TOWN rubs me the wrong way.
In post 1066, Wake1 wrote:No one's the leader of Town, and you're not the boss of me, so like hell should I feel compelled to shut up and start cooperating without asking questions.
BP's either Scum or a bad player who gets in the way of Scumhunting. Just an impediment with a bad attitude, it seems.
In post 1093, Wake1 wrote:I decide who I pressure, and when. Juls is not so special she can't be pressured. I don't give a damn if people don't want me to question her. No one's above inquiry.
In post 1126, Alina wrote:Hunter is insane. This is basically a day 2 policy lynch. Day 2, 3 town down, lets lynch the crazy guy and not even bother looking for someone who seems like scum who ISN'T making a complete joke out of themselves! Wait, no, that's a stupid idea. How about we at least try and look for people who look bad instead of putting him on L-3 BEFORE EVEN 24 HOURS HAS PASSED?
In post 1138, Aeronaut wrote:I'm going to be honest, here. Hunterseeker is probably the most annoying person I've played with. He's lurking, he's using the terms from friggin Epicmafia, he's distracting us and not helping us at all.
I hate him.
That being said, weneedto make the right move. Say that we mislynch. Say we have an SK. That's three potential villagers we lose tonight. It's going to go downhill fast if we jump to conclusions. By only focusing on HS, we're totally overlooking the other 17 people in this game.
I'm not against lynching him. I'm against lynching himtoo quickly.
In post 1156, Aeronaut wrote:Alright. So I've been looking through Farside's ISO, and found something sort of interesting.
In post 949, farside22 wrote:Last minute thoughts.
Hs needs to post.
Bp still bugs me.
Damon should also be looked into.
This was a post on page 38, the last words of our fallen Farside. I find it interesting that BP and Damon have remained pretty quiet as of late, and are both on Farsides list of people to look at.
Maybe he was getting too close to being right?
In post 1165, reinoe wrote:In post 1150, tn5421 wrote:
So dodging questions is considered acceptable behavior now? Why didn't you tell me?!
It can be acceptable to dodge questions depending on the circumstances. It can be acceptable to completely dodge players. I've done both as town. Sometimes you have to recognize how your interactions affect the entire town, and getting stuck in a quagmire with Wake will definitely have adverse affects on the town as a whole and individual players.
In post 1184, Aeronaut wrote:Wake, what do you make of Damon? Just curious about this.
I've been reading his ISO (It's not long really) and It seems off to me. Very... self aware. He also seems to be buddying with you a bit. I dunno.
In post 1197, Boonskiies wrote:In post 8, HunterSeeker wrote:/confirm for 1st game outside newbie town. Is there a setup/role list and/or do we know the town/scum ratio?
Wait, come on guys? He asked this on the first page, and then went along with stating there were 5 mafia.
In post 1235, Boonskiies wrote:It was before I ISO'd Alina and found her original starting of a Hunter wagon and then her stopping it. And her indecisiveness is scummy. she doesn't fully commit to anything. Not being the front liner doesn't bring much attention to her thus making her 'seem' town.
In post 1248, Boonskiies wrote:I'm leaving discussion open for both sides. Testing your reactions. You're cautious, Alina. Very cautious. There are a few possibilities when it comes to you; I'm not positive on which, but I do believe you are scum of some sort. You could be a SK for all I know. But you are definitely not vanilla. And unless you are a town PR, which i doubt, but if you are, do not claim...you are scum.
In post 1322, Boonskiies wrote:Agh, now she's trying to AtE. (kidding) that post genuinely made me laugh, I liked it. haha. And so you see, my whole thing here was trying to get some kind of reaction out of you, which it most definitely did, might I add, but I am nowhere near positive enough to go through with a lynch on you toDay.
UNVOTE: Alina
I will be watching you though...don't slip, scummy.
[bold] FoS: Alina [/bold]
In post 1342, Alina wrote:OH, Damon HAS visited the site since the thread opened. INTERESTING.
I personally think it's a bit disingenious to question the validity of a V/LA unless the player has a history of taking clearly illegitimate ones (which ideally would be brought up to the staff team if it does indeed become a pattern). Having kept a loose eye on players' activity outside this game, I am fairly sure this specific case was legitimate.In post 1175, Juls wrote:In post 1166, Aegor wrote:In post 1155, Juls wrote:
Where is it against the rules? I have never seen that rule and personally don't think it should be against the rules. But, show me where and I will be glad to drop it. I have seen people scum hunt all the time by seeing who is online or in scum chat or last visited so I don't see how this is any different.
Read the activity rules for this game. Attempting to circumvent them via illegitimate V/LA is a clear violation. Furthermore, Site Rules prohibit bringing outside influences, of which this is mostdefinitelyone, into the game. You are more than welcome to poll mods on this issue if you do not believe me.
Meh, I won't push it but I don't see anything in site wide rules or mod rules that what I am accusing Adrien of is a violation nor do I see anything that says my questioning of it is a violation. Regardless, I'm dropping it and will dig inTo this deeper behind the scenes.