In post 356, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 334, BBmolla wrote:Hey I'm gonna vig DGB tonight, anyone opposed?
Certainly not me, Mr "Vig."
That's Mr. SK to you DGB
In post 356, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 334, BBmolla wrote:Hey I'm gonna vig DGB tonight, anyone opposed?
Certainly not me, Mr "Vig."
In post 375, BBmolla wrote:In post 356, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 334, BBmolla wrote:Hey I'm gonna vig DGB tonight, anyone opposed?
Certainly not me, Mr "Vig."
That's Mr. SK to you DGB
In post 381, Dr Pants wrote:ikr
I love the logic: "look at this terrible wagon! It so bad that scum must be off it!"
In post 383, ActionDan wrote:that's if he's scum. And then it's arguable.
I think the main offense of 378- 379 is not giving the people who weren't actually here and thus literally sitting out any thought.
In post 384, Antihero wrote:In post 381, Dr Pants wrote:ikr
I love the logic: "look at this terrible wagon! It so bad that scum must be off it!"
yeah, and then naming a list like [mastin, actiondan, guy with 2 posts] and ending up voting guy with two posts.
...who hasn't posted since the RVS, so if he's going with a theory of "ohlol, scum KNEW it was a gambit so they intentionally stayed off the wagon", that's the shittiest vote available.
VOTE: SKOT
In post 388, Dr Pants wrote:why did you only look at 3 people who weren't on the wagon, 1 of which (mastin) you dismissed immediately as a town read?
In post 362, mastin2 wrote:
However, given her intention this game was to die today, it makes perfect sense. She lays out in advance exactly what she's planning to do, while at the same time, doing the very thing you're saying she hasn't, and taking out "scum" before she dies. (Sala wasn't, but point stands.)