The Second Fortnight (Game Over)

[kanyeknowsbest]

wheres ya self hammer aegor?

[farside22]

wheres ya self hammer aegor?

He's not in hammer range.
You could vote him if you want that to happen.

[DrippingGoofball]

The bold is even more rediculous considering that rule in place if player lynched is town, they still
Get to accuse a player.

What is the bribe business then?

[kanyeknowsbest]

wheres ya self hammer aegor?

He's not in hammer range.
You could vote him if you want that to happen.

Thanks For the Help Farside, That Was Real Helpful.

[farside22]

wheres ya self hammer aegor?

He's not in hammer range.
You could vote him if you want that to happen.

Thanks For the Help Farside, That Was Real Helpful.

Sorry didn't know you thought aegor was a stupid player.

[farside22]

The bold is even more rediculous considering that rule in place if player lynched is town, they still
Get to accuse a player.

What is the bribe business then?

You going to bribe me?

[Prof Fridays]

Not voting Aegor. Still like UT for scum.

[farside22]

Not voting Aegor. Still like UT for scum.

Who else you got in your head?

[Prof Fridays]

I'd be willing to go for a hiplop lynch.

[Rob14]

Aegor, explain why you would want to self-hammer yourself as town. How does it help you achieve your wincon?

[T-Bone]

I'm tempted to dance him into L-1 to see what would happen. But if there is scum off the wagon they could just quick hammer too. If Aegor was serious about getting himself lynched he would have already brought himself to L-1 and let that possibly happen. So I don't know, this is a weird play. Would scum really tempt the rest of the playerlist to lynch them in an effort to prove they aren't scum?

[Prof Fridays]

Aegor, explain why you would want to self-hammer yourself as town. How does it help you achieve your wincon?

Yeah, I'm not really sure why zoraster said he would not be playing against his win con. If you die, you

automatically lose

no matter what role you are.

[Aegor]

Aegor is scum. No real town wants to lynch themselves over a scum read, which would give them double the chances of hitting scum (one lynch and one accuse vs just one accuse)

It does not give me any meaningful advantage. I have zero expectation that scum will be lynched today. Why would I not want to lynch myself? If some other town is lynched, then I am at risk at getting my accusation thrown out because I am myself the most accused. Unless the rest of the players are self-destructively vindictive, my own lynch gives me a higher chance of success. You are forgetting that I do

not

necessarily get a second chance of hitting scum.

not buying the aegor-pressure leave. He promised to hammer himself and we will never know whether he was going to do it or not. Its an easy way to deflect pressure.

You will if I reach L-1.

Can we just fucking lynch aegor shes obviously scum

Yes, please do.

Aegor, explain why you would want to self-hammer yourself as town. How does it help you achieve your wincon?

See above.

I'm tempted to dance him into L-1 to see what would happen. But if there is scum off the wagon they could just quick hammer too. If Aegor was serious about getting himself lynched he would have already brought himself to L-1 and let that possibly happen. So I don't know, this is a weird play. Would scum really tempt the rest of the playerlist to lynch them in an effort to prove they aren't scum?

Why would I bring myself to L-1 and hope that someone else votes? Much easier and reliable to self-hammer. If someone else promises a hammer if I get to L-1, I will totally put myself there.

Yeah, I'm not really sure why zoraster said he would not be playing against his win con. If you die, you

automatically lose

no matter what role you are.

That is simply not true. I still get an accusation.

[Aegor]

hiplop's jump onto my wagon looks really bad, even ironic given the "opportunistic scum" charge.

[Aegor]

Below are also awful votes:

So you're claiming to have scum motivation, then, Aegor?

VOTE: Aegor

Cool.

Crap reasoning; strawman argument; nothing original; no depth of thought whatsoever; standard scummy bandwagon leap.

I would say that
Scum: Aegor

(omg banakai bandwagon scum post right here)

[...]
VOTE: Aegor
Yep I got on the tallest wagon again I must be scum vote me kiddos.

(I actually avoided posting because everything I post get's called scummy, so I was just hoping to make it tommorow for a sliver of a chance to win, but whatever I basically gave up on winning even before I started)

Do not know whether obnoxious or scummy.

[Banakai]

Yeah but aegor... why would you not put yourself at l-1, most likely a scum would quick hammer and then flee, is that not the same as hammering yourself?

[Banakai]

unless there is already 2 scum on your wagon, which would be helpful to know

or they try to play mind games and they purposely don't quick hammer

or they are your mafia partner and they don't quick hammer

[Banakai]

Although mind games probbably wouldn't be a good choice for scum since they have got to flee anyway so they might as well end the day early rather than keeping the disscussion going

[Aegor]

As I said, if I get to L-1, I will hammer myself. If someone else is willing to hammer, I will put myself at L-1 gladly.

[Banakai]

so basically if you lived up to your word you would vote yourself

[Aegor]

And scum have an incentive to keep a viable accusation target alive. Hence there should be some attention focused on those players who steadfastly refuse to vote me but are not really trying to scumhunt elsewhere.

[Aegor]

so basically if you lived up to your word you would vote yourself

For a lynch, yes.

[Banakai]

mafia would be willing to hammer, but they aren't just going to post in thread "yah put yourself at l-1 and then I will hammer you and flee ok bud?"

[Aegor]

Some town player may.

[Banakai]

give me one good reason that you think mafia wouldn't hammer you