kabooooom - 2 - StupendousMan, Phallacy
Salamence20 - 2 - Bins, tn5421,
Phallacy - 2 - kabooooom, Doogal121,
Not Voting: DoritoPortal, Salamence20
Deadline: (expired on 2014-08-24 18:18:00)
With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
In post 97, Salamence20 wrote:So TN, you think it was anti-town to quicklynch?
I mean, at the time (when i thought mafia could kill), do you think mafia would try to find the SK and keep him alive to endgame him and keep from making this game nightless? I think my ideas very optimal (yet unorthodox, I agree)
In post 81, Phallacy wrote:LOL kaboom. You signed up a few months ago. We are a hydra of two very experienced players with high win rates. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself now.
I'm not sure why you are expecting a fully fleshed out case on Page 2 or 3,
but it's not going to happen. I'll vote where I wish, and I'll reveal my conclusions when I wish.
You call my pressure on you "fake" but you are the one who has responded so defensively.
Not to mention the false bravado that is very unlike you, so yeah. You're scum.
You say there is scum motivation. Please do explain which post, what is the motivation behind it, and why you think it comes from scum?
In post 106, kabooooom wrote:Another scum post!
In post 81, Phallacy wrote:LOL kaboom. You signed up a few months ago. We are a hydra of two very experienced players with high win rates. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself now.
if you are saying truth, you are in trouble. because you cant have secret hydras. And if you are lying.....gotta scum!
I'm not sure why you are expecting a fully fleshed out case on Page 2 or 3,
well, if you are so sure im scum in Page-2 or 3, then i do expect a fully fleshed case.
but it's not going to happen. I'll vote where I wish, and I'll reveal my conclusions when I wish.
if everyone starts replying like this game isnt going to move forward.
You call my pressure on you "fake" but you are the one who has responded so defensively.
show me where?
Not to mention the false bravado that is very unlike you, so yeah. You're scum.
elaborate.
You say there is scum motivation. Please do explain which post, what is the motivation behind it, and why you think it comes from scum?
You ask, you get. as soon as i will catchup, i will show you.
In post 51, kabooooom wrote:
Because you are wrong. For example,if i wouldnt have voted molla, we wouldnt be having this discussion. We probably would be still in RVS just randomly voting each other.
Its not that i cant vote molla in RVS. Infact Rvs is the only time when you can do whatever you want to do. Whats the point of voting molla after RVS is over.
In post 60, kabooooom wrote:
yes. But don't you see his changing nature?
he is trying to generate discussion, get reaction and scumhunt. But when i accuse him of fake scumhunting, unable to reply he is just like he doesn't care.
that's a scum, right there!
In post 117, Not_Mafia wrote:Maybe you're following me in reverse
In post 112, Not_Mafia wrote:She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?
Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.
In post 119, kabooooom wrote:In post 112, Not_Mafia wrote:She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?
she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.
Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.
In post 119, kabooooom wrote:In post 112, Not_Mafia wrote:She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?
she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.
In post 119, kabooooom wrote:
Are you claiming Slayer's gambit? Otherwise you didn't get us out of RVS, Phallacy (and Stupendous man to a lesser extent) did.
slayer's gambit?
and yes, you are right. Phallacy and stupendiousman get us out of rvs, BUT through me. if i would have just voted random player, it would have never happened. now im not saying that i knew that would happen. but because i took part in rvs, in my own way, we got out of rvs.
In post 121, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 119, kabooooom wrote:In post 112, Not_Mafia wrote:She's not wrong first of all. What do you view the purpose of RVS as? And if RVS is unable to generate discussion then why does it exist and how is it possible to transition out it?
she is. Because just votes doesnt start discussion. the question and accusations made starts the discussion.
for example, if i made any scummy sentence without voting, discussion can be generated from it.
on the other hand, simply voting each other doesnt do any good, unless someone is accused of something.
You didn't answer my questions.