In post 5347, xofelf wrote:I won't flip scum. I will flip as the role I claimed. Because I haven't lied about a thing.
ATE
Also, this post means nothing.
In post 5347, xofelf wrote:I won't flip scum. I will flip as the role I claimed. Because I haven't lied about a thing.
In post 5349, xofelf wrote:Y and B: Their so called easily confirmable role hasn't been confirmed yet.
PA: I know she can post better than she has. Last time she did the prod dodge super busy dance she was scum. I don't normally meta, but her tone feels the same.
Otherwise most other people are fairly null. Not too many people are giving off vibes of hiding things or blatantly lying. Or their posts have them fluctuate back and forth with feeling townie and feeling scummy.
In post 5319, Serene2 wrote:you know, the fact that MOLLA HIMSELF is voting xof shows that her claim is a pretty direct counter-claim to his own]
the people hemming and hawing about how two JOATs can exist? Well, maybe, but highly freaking unlikely. Go back and look--- it's Molla that's sure her role can't exist in conjunction with xof's. Xof is more along the lines of "oh, two joats, ha ha thats weird lol lol lets talk about something else"
the fact that she's a MISH MASH player just makes it MORE likely that she fucked up by revealing what are pretty obviously scum-JOAT roles. as a non-mafia player, she might not have known any better.
in other words, rope that shit
In post 5350, beastcharizard wrote:In post 5347, xofelf wrote:I won't flip scum. I will flip as the role I claimed. Because I haven't lied about a thing.
ATE
Also, this post means nothing.
I seriously consider joining this wagon now. Both reads rely on meta-o-ptoddoge and a claim. Over 5000 posts that sucks ass in my opinion, and as a dying person id work more as final effort.In post 5351, Egg wrote:In post 5349, xofelf wrote:Y and B: Their so called easily confirmable role hasn't been confirmed yet.
PA: I know she can post better than she has. Last time she did the prod dodge super busy dance she was scum. I don't normally meta, but her tone feels the same.
Otherwise most other people are fairly null. Not too many people are giving off vibes of hiding things or blatantly lying. Or their posts have them fluctuate back and forth with feeling townie and feeling scummy.
So on page 215 you have two reads?
In post 5349, xofelf wrote:Y and B: Their so called easily confirmable role hasn't been confirmed yet.
PA: I know she can post better than she has. Last time she did the prod dodge super busy dance she was scum. I don't normally meta, but her tone feels the same.
Otherwise most other people are fairly null. Not too many people are giving off vibes of hiding things or blatantly lying. Or their posts have them fluctuate back and forth with feeling townie and feeling scummy.
In post 5342, shos wrote:In post 5340, Majiffy wrote:In post 5335, shos wrote:
Althoughbeing a CW to scum twice would kinda help my cause, Im not quite sure.
#scumposting
#DeathTunneling
In post 5363, shos wrote:Why the fuck would we want to ask that publicly?!?!
In post 5365, shos wrote:well, how will the answer to this question help you? all I can see is how it helps scum - they know if he had a shard, and if he did,they know who NOW has the shard.that is immensely stupid.