In post 971, Titus wrote:In post 964, Majiffy wrote:Jesus Christ I have already had and won this argument why don't you go reread.
The argument is not won until Tree is lynched. I'm actually in agreement with Aeronaut on Tree's behavior so far. Seems noob town.
Then you should go re-read my argument with TSO where I shoot down any plausible town motivation and show plausible scum motivation for his play RE: double gambit.
Yeah, but you're not even remotely close to a viable presence in this game.
What have you done?
In post 991, Alina wrote:And farside thinking texcat and tree are scumbuddies and yet not voting tree....ookay....
RIGHT?!
In post 991, Alina wrote:
Suddenly gigantic reads list! I don't really have any major objections to any of these reads
Considering you have been posting things that would infer similar reads to my own, and these reads are close to the polar opposite, I'm left scratching my head at this.
In post 1020, Mirhawk wrote:Probably because Jiffy isn't saying anything about it.
Why would I complain about getting my way?
See this is where everyone gets it wrong.
That was entirely my argument against TSO's "no the gambit was sooooo town".
The scumread is about his play
In post 1042, gameplay506 wrote:I dont like how tree just came in the thread, talked shit, did shit and left. Right now I dont like him.
You mean like I said he's been doing?
Because he can't defend himself and needs to let Psychescum defend him?
Yeahhh.
You should vote Tree.
In post 1049, Elyse wrote:I feel like everyone is in the pool playing Marco Polo and you're that asshole who's shouting polo from the chair on the side.
Fucking lol