NY 177: Simple Complexity (GAME OVER: Scum Wins!)

notscience · Post Post #1425 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:25 am

aka

I know it's right and I can't bullshit a refutation

Elyse · Post Post #1426 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:26 am

In post 1424, gameplay506 wrote:
In post 1422, Elyse wrote:No I'm saying that I don't give a fuck who's on the wagon and why because there is a shitload of evidence against him. I'm not going to stop the lynch because a few people on it didn't give an essay as to why they are voting him.

Elyse lol. This is so wrong that I dont know what to say.

Except it's not.

Aeronaut · Post Post #1427 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:27 am

Um, Elyse are you Rolefishing right now?

In post 1415, Elyse wrote:The fact that you "didn't make a deal" is irrelevant, Aeronaut.

You voted for tree, someone who:

-you called town
-you said you hated the wagon on him
-you criticized NS for joining the wagon on him despite townreading him (
I can see that point
but NS at least had a reason [compromising with Majiffy])

First point. You understand that half the people on that wagon called Tree town, correct? Including Notscience, Tn, Mirhawk, etc. Irrelevant.
Second point. Yea, I did. Then he came in and decided to come back and be terrible, and suddenly the wagon didn't look so bad anymore.
Third point. So this is one of the things that I'm scum for, but you agree with it? What?

Also, this is the last thing I'm going to say on the "I need Majiffy's vote" matter. That's a shit reason and we all know it. C'mon now, Majiffy is one vote. There's 21 people in this game, and we don't all need Majiffy's approval to lynch somebody. If Notscience actually feels the need to have somebody vote with him so that it doesn't look he's manipulating the town, I think we all need to take another look at Notscience. C'mon people, I'm sorry, but that's just ridiculous.

and
then you said you would lynch yourself if he flipped scum.

I want you to find the post where I say I'll lynch myself. Yea, if I were to vote for myself, that would be anti-town AF. I didn't say that, and never will vote for myself. Because that's silly.

You even admit that it's a joke

. C'mon now, Elyse. Stop trying so hard. Find the post, and then stop misrepresenting me.

And you still had an awful change in opinion on tree that you lied about three times and then tried to pass off as "a gradual read change that happened when you thought about the wagon" which I call bullshit on. Like you should be lynched already and people making excuses for you and trying to derail the wagon makes me even more confident in this read.

How many times has NotScience changed his opinion on tree? I have to go back and check, but I'm pretty sure he just called him scum again. Again, you're just not making sense.

In post 1419, Elyse wrote:
In post 1417, gameplay506 wrote:
In post 1415, Elyse wrote:This is especially to gameplay like what the fuck is that Mirhawk vote? You're the only one voting him. Do you seriously expect that lynch to go through?

I seriously think it can go through, There is plenty of time we don't need to rush lynches.

For what? Saying that Aero needs to cut the softclaim bullshit and we should run him up to L-1 for a claim?

Better string me up too!

Elyse, you're trying awful hard to get a roleclaim out of me.

You understand that you are hardcore role fishing right now

, correct? Like, Hardcore. I'm really not liking it. I was honestly reading Town on you but the more you do this, you're getting more null.

notscience · Post Post #1428 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:28 am

It's not rolefishing when you've plastered taht you have a role all over the game

It's antitown wifom now to keep it hidden.

Elyse · Post Post #1429 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:30 am

I'll read that entire wall later when I have the energy

but

I WANT TO GET YOU TO L-1 TO CLAIM BECAUSE YOU'VE BEEN SOFTCLAIMING LIKE A MOTHERFUCKER AND IT'S SCARING SOME IDIOTS FROM VOTING YOU EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY SCUM.

notscience · Post Post #1430 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:31 am

Elyse what did you think of drunktitus

Psyche · Post Post #1431 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:32 am

this is me rolefishing too

Aeronaut · Post Post #1432 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:32 am

In post 1428, notscience wrote:It's not rolefishing when you've plastered that you have a role all over the game

It's antitown wifom now to keep it hidden.

Oh, yes, of course it is. I could be Bulletproof for all they know. They base their kill off of having more information. You people trying to get it out of me before I'm at L-1 is horrible. Just because you can't put a wagon together doesn't mean I need to die in the night.

Psyche · Post Post #1433 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:34 am

scum don't usually NK their own teammates aero

Psyche · Post Post #1434 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:35 am

So, you are a PR, aero?

notscience · Post Post #1435 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:35 am

Hypothetical.

There's a scum

Let's just call him Aeronaut

He softclaims a role.

We make him claim

He claims tracker.

Now, we have a townie, lets just call him jimmy

Jimmy's a tracker and CCs him

We have confscum now!

Aeronaut · Post Post #1436 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:37 am

In post 1429, Elyse wrote:I'll read that entire wall later when I have the energy

but

I WANT TO GET YOU TO L-1 TO CLAIM BECAUSE YOU'VE BEEN SOFTCLAIMING LIKE A MOTHERFUCKER AND IT'S SCARING SOME IDIOTS FROM VOTING YOU EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY SCUM.

I don't know what you expect me to do about it, or why you're in all caps. What am I supposed to do, be scummier? Sorry :/

You really enjoy tunneling. I feel like you should pay attention to whats going on around you some more. By all means, keep your vote on me, but pay attention to the reactions of the people on your wagons for late game.

Psyche · Post Post #1437 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:43 am

are you a pr aero

Aeronaut · Post Post #1438 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:48 am

Well, since you people have made it glaringly obvious, yea. Thank you, role fish.

reinoe · Post Post #1439 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:59 am

In post 1438, Aeronaut wrote:Well, since you people have made it glaringly obvious, yea. Thank you, role fish.

Can we lynch tree now?

gameplay506 · Post Post #1440 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:00 am

Fuckin shitty elyse. Are you happy now? Ffs.

tree · Post Post #1441 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:02 am

In post 1440, gameplay506 wrote:Fuckin shitty elyse. Are you happy now? Ffs.

VOTE: gameplay

"I'm scum and I know Aero is a Town PR for sure so I'm going to make this angry-sounding post for towncred"

Elyse · Post Post #1442 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:03 am

In post 1430, notscience wrote:Elyse what did you think of drunktitus

Nothing. I still think she's scum.

In post 1438, Aeronaut wrote:Well, since you people have made it glaringly obvious, yea. Thank you, role fish.

No. YOU made it glaringly obvious when you softclaimed like every post.

P-edit:
No that means nothing. Natirasha claimed PR in his first post and ended up being scum.

Elyse · Post Post #1443 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:03 am

That was at gameplay.

reinoe · Post Post #1444 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:03 am

In post 1441, tree wrote:
In post 1440, gameplay506 wrote:Fuckin shitty elyse. Are you happy now? Ffs.

VOTE: gameplay

"I'm scum and I know Aero is a Town PR for sure so I'm going to make this angry-sounding post for towncred"

We can lynch tree. Really we can. We just need to have the will.

gameplay506 · Post Post #1445 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:04 am

You dont know how wrong you are. Or how bad this vote is actually.

But ye Aero's wagon IS scum motivated. Going after Psyche/ Mirhawk right now.

Aeronaut · Post Post #1446 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:05 am

In post 1439, reinoe wrote:
In post 1438, Aeronaut wrote:Well, since you people have made it glaringly obvious, yea. Thank you, role fish.

Can we lynch tree now?

Tree's trying though. He's helping town more than Oka, because Oka won't give an opinion.

P-edit:

gameplay506 · Post Post #1447 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:05 am

Elyse pls stop destroying town and outing pr's. Just stop.

reinoe · Post Post #1448 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:09 am

In post 1446, Aeronaut wrote:
In post 1439, reinoe wrote:
In post 1438, Aeronaut wrote:Well, since you people have made it glaringly obvious, yea. Thank you, role fish.

Can we lynch tree now?

Tree's trying though. He's helping town more than Oka, because Oka won't give an opinion.

P-edit:

Possibly...but I have to take into account someone who might be a PR and lying low. That's why it's not just helping town...who's HURTING TOWN.

tree has done things to hurt town and continues to do so. I'm not convinced he's done anything to help town.

Elyse · Post Post #1449 (ISO) » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:09 am

In post 1427, Aeronaut wrote:

In post 1415, Elyse wrote:The fact that you "didn't make a deal" is irrelevant, Aeronaut.

You voted for tree, someone who:

-you called town
-you said you hated the wagon on him
-you criticized NS for joining the wagon on him despite townreading him (
I can see that point
but NS at least had a reason [compromising with Majiffy])

First point. You understand that half the people on that wagon called Tree town, correct? Including Notscience, Tn, Mirhawk, etc. Irrelevant.

You didn't have a good reason for doing so.

In post 1427, Aeronaut wrote:
Second point. Yea, I did. Then he came in and decided to come back and be terrible, and suddenly the wagon didn't look so bad anymore.

Ok.

In post 1427, Aeronaut wrote:
Third point. So this is one of the things that I'm scum for, but you agree with it? What?

No I said I could see your criticism of NS' vote.

In post 1427, Aeronaut wrote:
Also, this is the last thing I'm going to say on the "I need Majiffy's vote" matter. That's a shit reason and we all know it. C'mon now, Majiffy is one vote. There's 21 people in this game, and we don't all need Majiffy's approval to lynch somebody. If Notscience actually feels the need to have somebody vote with him so that it doesn't look he's manipulating the town, I think we all need to take another look at Notscience. C'mon people, I'm sorry, but that's just ridiculous.

I said I don't agree with it but it's not scummy coming from notscience and Majiffy is really loud and convincing so I understand where he's coming from. And you just said that it was irrelevant that you voted for tree despite thinking he was town so why is it relevant for notscience?

In post 1427, Aeronaut wrote:

and
then you said you would lynch yourself if he flipped scum.

I want you to find the post where I say I'll lynch myself. Yea, if I were to vote for myself, that would be anti-town AF. I didn't say that, and never will vote for myself. Because that's silly.
You even admit that it's a joke
. C'mon now, Elyse. Stop trying so hard. Find the post, and then stop misrepresenting me.

Did you read my post? I understand it was a joke.

In post 1427, Aeronaut wrote:

And you still had an awful change in opinion on tree that you lied about three times and then tried to pass off as "a gradual read change that happened when you thought about the wagon" which I call bullshit on. Like you should be lynched already and people making excuses for you and trying to derail the wagon makes me even more confident in this read.

How many times has NotScience changed his opinion on tree? I have to go back and check, but I'm pretty sure he just called him scum again. Again, you're just not making sense.

What does notscience have to do with this at all? First off, he didn't change his opinion that much. And second, even if he did, I don't care because it wasn't within a page for no reason and he didn't lie about it three times. Stop trying to discredit me and saying that I don't make sense. Discredit the argument.

P-edit:
So gameplay I know now that if I'm ever scum and playing with you I should just claim a PR because that will get you off my back and I will never be in danger of being lynched.