NY 177: Simple Complexity (GAME OVER: Scum Wins!)

[reinoe]

@MOD

V/LA TILL THE 2ND

[gameplay506]

Ok now so reinoe how should I investigate Aero in the nb ? Why don't you show me how to investigate him, by investigating him yourself here in the thread. I will take notes if needed.

I think the above post confirms that there's 0 scumhunting going on in the neighborhood.

Why are you dodging?
Also I do scumhunting but here. But if I townread the people in the nb.

[Titus]

Out of curiousity, when did you figure out I was crumbing cop? I know you did.

[Titus]

^^^^ at Aero

[OkaPoka]

WHY ISNT TREE DEAD YET?????!!!!!????!!!!!

[Wake1]

Vote Count 1.9

Aeronaut (4):

Josh_B, notscience, Titus, Mirhawk

Tree (3):

reinoe, OkaPoka, Majiffy

Titus (2):

T S O, tn5421

OkaPoka (2):

Aeronaut, Alina

texcat (2):

Aegor, Replacement (Farside22)

tn5421 (2):

PeregrineV, Elyse

Elyse (1):

Gameplay506

RoyalApe (1):

Tree

Not Voting (4):

RoyalApe, Psyche, Shaddowez, texcat

~ With 21 players alive, it takes 11 to lynch!
~ Deadline expires 9/3/14, @8am central.

~ Seeking replacement for Farside22.

~ VLA: [reinoe 9/1/14]

OP | Game Rules | Day Start
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.19
Aegor's Lynch & Flip
Elyse and T S O's Murders & Flips
2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4
Aeronaut's Lynch & Flip
Texcat and Josh_B's Murders & Flips
3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.9
tn5421's Lynch & Flip
Titus's Murder & Flip
4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3
OkaPoka's Lynch & Flip
Majiffy and Mirhawk's Murders & Flips
5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.5
PeregrineV's Lynch & Flip
Gameplay506 and notsciences' Murders & Flips
6.1 | 6.2 | 6.3

[Elyse]

I'd also be down for an OkaPoka lynch.

[Josh_B]

A neighbor can also have any other PR.

I'm not saying they can't. I'm saying that - I don't know what I'm saying.
Back to lynching tree? OK.

[OkaPoka]

Your case?

[Elyse]

You've been doing nothing.

[OkaPoka]

Same with you.

[tn5421]

Gameplay you need to get over yourself.

Tn is spewing absolute bullshit and has flat out ignored multiple questions asked of him. He's stalling scum who can't come up with a reason to back up what he's saying.

Except I've already answered every single question that has been thrown at me, so why don't you backpedal more unless you have some fucking proof. Something that I've noticed every single one of your posts are extremely short on. All allegations, 0% proof.

So why don't you just trot along and let the big boys play mafia?

[Psyche]

oh now there's a misogynistic aspect to it

[Elyse]

Same with you.

You can argue that what I've been doing isn't good, but you can't argue I've been doing nothing. Come on now, Oka. You're scum, aren't you?

Gameplay you need to get over yourself.

Tn is spewing absolute bullshit and has flat out ignored multiple questions asked of him. He's stalling scum who can't come up with a reason to back up what he's saying.

Except I've already answered every single question that has been thrown at me, so why don't you backpedal more unless you have some fucking proof. Something that I've noticed every single one of your posts are extremely short on. All allegations, 0% proof.

So why don't you just trot along and let the big boys play mafia?

You haven't, actually. Mirhawk has asked you several times what I'm lying about and why it's relevant, and all you say is "She's twisting words, take it as you will", which doesn't answer either question. I've given you proof over and over and you haven't given

anything

to back up your claims, yet you act like it's the other way around.

You're borderline delusional, and I only say that because I can't explain your actions otherwise. I'm not even sure if you're scum anymore, or whether you're just unable to communicate normally.

[tree]

VOTE: oka

Elyse I'm feeling like tn is just one of those players that never really learned the golden rule

vote oka with me?

[tn5421]

oh now there's a misogynistic aspect to it

"big boys"

>implying that i made a "gb2kitchen" reference

It's not sexism, it's ageism.

[tn5421]

Same with you.

You can argue that what I've been doing isn't good, but you can't argue I've been doing nothing. Come on now, Oka. You're scum, aren't you?

Gameplay you need to get over yourself.

Tn is spewing absolute bullshit and has flat out ignored multiple questions asked of him. He's stalling scum who can't come up with a reason to back up what he's saying.

Except I've already answered every single question that has been thrown at me, so why don't you backpedal more unless you have some fucking proof. Something that I've noticed every single one of your posts are extremely short on. All allegations, 0% proof.

So why don't you just trot along and let the big boys play mafia?

You haven't, actually. Mirhawk has asked you several times what I'm lying about and why it's relevant, and all you say is "She's twisting words, take it as you will", which doesn't answer either question. I've given you proof over and over and you haven't given

anything

to back up your claims, yet you act like it's the other way around.

You're borderline delusional

, and I only say that because I can't explain your actions otherwise. I'm not even sure if you're scum anymore, or whether you're just unable to communicate normally.

"I'm intentionally letting myself get distracted so I can point at this later and say 'this is why i wasnt scumhunting'"

Once again you make a sweeping generalization and don't back it up with proof.
Oh, and stay classy. Ad Hominem attacks are all the rage. Since you aren't likely to understand what I'm talking about, I helpfully bolded it for you.

[OkaPoka]

By that logic my push on gameplay was doing something, and my push on tree is doing something. My wish to have aeronaut wagon disbanded is doing something.

[tree]

"big boys" is an inherently sexist phrase especially in the context of how you were saying it to elyse
there's an existing implication that you view the recipient as a little girl, with the further implication that it makes them weak and unsuited to dealing with the situation
and just because a term has been used often in the past doesn't make it any less bad

[OkaPoka]

Are we really going to debate this?

[gameplay506]

I am ok with Oka too/

[Majiffy]

Are we really going to debate this?

Right?

[gameplay506]

Oka make a case on tree

[Elyse]

VOTE: OkaPoka

[gameplay506]

Elyse Aero is on that wagon. Doesn't that bother you?