In post 605, T S O wrote:Myko, I'm fucking tired of hearing you repeat yourself with your shitty case. It's trash. I addressed the fucking thing. Now go play the game.
I think this post pretty much makes me think of TSO as town.
In post 605, T S O wrote:Myko, I'm fucking tired of hearing you repeat yourself with your shitty case. It's trash. I addressed the fucking thing. Now go play the game.
In post 625, MafiaSSK wrote:In post 605, T S O wrote:Myko, I'm fucking tired of hearing you repeat yourself with your shitty case. It's trash. I addressed the fucking thing. Now go play the game.
I think this post pretty much makes me think of TSO as town.
In post 610, Csareo wrote:In post 590, mykonian wrote:Good, csareo, you are here.
In post 565, mykonian wrote:Regarding flubby, I don't think I get him. His play is erratic. Csareo, by chance, would you still have a link to the place where you know flubber from?
Two ongoing games.
In post 621, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm still drawing blanks on how myko is trying to get his reads. And he's probably going to scum read me for saying I'm drawing blanks. Like that's the kind of logic I feel like he's trying to push. I don't get it. I almost got it in the beginning of the game but now idk.
In post 625, MafiaSSK wrote:In post 605, T S O wrote:Myko, I'm fucking tired of hearing you repeat yourself with your shitty case. It's trash. I addressed the fucking thing. Now go play the game.
I think this post pretty much makes me think of TSO as town.
In post 626, Anatole Kuragin wrote:People feign outrage all the time as scum.
In post 629, vezokpiraka wrote:I've read everything.
Scum reads: espresso, carstereo and farside
Town reads: reck, mikonyan
The rest are different shades of null.
I'llvote carstereo
In post 631, xRECKONERx wrote:vezok can you expand on your carstereo thoughts?
In post 633, farside22 wrote:In post 630, xRECKONERx wrote:Ugh vezok is town. Okay.
Please show meta why this is town vezo.
In post 189, Csareo wrote:VOTE: anatole
I warned him that I needed a vote justification.
He'll need a very good story to convince me why he could quickly go post in the other forum, but ignore me here.
In post 192, Csareo wrote:In post 191, Ki-Gi wrote:You answered the first question with the second question (and all your other posts).
Don't ive me that bullshit. Everyone knows that "policy lynch" talk is "scum convincing townies to lynch townies" talk
In post 542, Csareo wrote:I am worried about lynching him. He's annoying, but not enough to policy lynch.
Having strong feelings that people are using his aggravating personality as grounds for a lynch.
Not completely convinced at this point.
In post 614, Csareo wrote:I think we should go forward with a policy lynch.
Perhaps an inactive or problematic player.
In post 499, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 497, farside22 wrote:I have a simple question.
Maybe I missed it, but how do you like a case about a player and how it's put together and think the player is talking about someone else?
Because myko mentioned Matt in his case on TSO and for some reason Matt's name was on my mind when I was writing up my response.
Have youneverbeen writing something down and having a conversation with someone and accidentally wrote down what you were saying/what the other person was saying instead of what you meant to write?
In post 498, xRECKONERx wrote:"Myko is town...I liked his case...I don't want to lynch Matt"
This are the three statements made in that post.
In post 551, xRECKONERx wrote:I voted him and didn't mention flailing, so did MattP
So your decision to hand-wave the wagon away by misconstruing Espresso's reasons as the entire wagon's reasons is really bad