In post 822, Shinobi wrote:The issue is that uct's reasoning completely falls apart if NPAU is town. In theory, town lynches are all illogical because lynching town inherently makes no sense. Uct's reasoning for his scumread boils down to "it sets people up to be town" which is nothing more than convenience for the sake of convenience.
The primary reason for voting is NPAU being a scum read. If NPAU is town, then I start all over.
Heck, look at this completed game: I hammered mathbandit because I thought he was scum.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p6102032
Turns out mathbandit flipped town, so I was wrong. I'm like, ok well damn, let's go rethink my logic.
The associative reasoning, that's all
I'm not lynching NPAU for an info lynch (which is what you are implying). I don't have a town read on NPAU at all. I'm lynching him primarily because I think he's scum. Associative reading is *not* set in concrete; they could have night 1, day 2, night 2, day 3, night 3, etc.