Doesn't that make Fuzzy confscum then? Wgeurts died, there's no ninja type role in this setup, Fuzzy was the only one that visited Wgeurts = fuzzy must be scum.
VOTE: Fuzzybutternut
Also, Fuzzy claiming he thought a "strong-willed roleblock" blocked incoming actions was weird.
In post 225, Lissa wrote:Also, Fuzzy claiming he thought a "strong-willed roleblock" blocked incoming actions was weird.
The way the role PM stated it made it sound like all actions would fail. I wasn't actually expecting him to die last night. Go read it yourself.
Oh. I guess I see how you could've made that error.
I still lean towards you being scum over yolo. If he was scum why would he make a claim like that before lylo? If you're lynched and flip town he gets lynched tomorrow.
In post 232, Edosurist wrote:@fuzzy
So if you thought all other actions would fail, why did you also do a cop investigation?
What sense would it make if my actions failed too? That would completely negate the roleblock. I KNEW my actions would go through, but I didn't think anyone else's would. I told you. I completely misunderstood my role PM.
In post 232, Edosurist wrote:@fuzzy
So if you thought all other actions would fail, why did you also do a cop investigation?
I understand what you're saying, btw. That's just not something you think about when you're roleblocking someone. Like, your first thought would be "I'm going to roleblock and investigate him, in case he's lying." not "I'm either going to roleblock him OR investigate him, in case he's lying." It never crossed my mind that, because I roleblocked him, my investigation might fail.
That just seems flawed. I could see your confusion over the roleblocker's ability because of the typo, but no where does it say that your other role could still work. In fact, it leads to the opposite. See the bolded text.