Newbie 1544 - Shakespeare Mafia: GAME OVER!
-
-
fferyllt Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Posts: 20513
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Location: Left Coast
Last edited by fferyllt on Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.-
-
aphix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1350
- Joined: September 2, 2013
In post 48, House wrote:In post 47, roseylily wrote:In post 16, aphix wrote:Roseylilly: What do you think of shinobis RVS sheep here?
It was an RVS vote, and it was only the second vote. I don't think it's a particularly scummy move.
I'm House, and I approve this post.
Agreed.-
-
House Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 19605
- Joined: September 5, 2014
- Location: Home of Top Gun
-
-
aphix Mafia Scum
-
-
Nachomamma8 Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Posts: 38382
- Joined: June 5, 2009
- Location: Chicago
In post 31, House wrote:Hi all!
VOTE: aphix
You sure are digging in your heels on an RVS vote, and the deliberate misrep means more coming from an SE than if it had simply been a newbie.
Serious vote is serious. RVS over.
Aphix is undoubtedly my strongest town read for his attempts to get the game started. I don't think the misrep had any scum motivation behind it: he was bored because the game was going slowly, and so he pressured Klingon to get a reaction out of him and jumped the gun too hard when looking for contradictions."Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.-
-
Nachomamma8 Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Posts: 38382
- Joined: June 5, 2009
- Location: Chicago
In post 43, House wrote:In post 42, Shinobi wrote:It doesn't matter if RVS has a purpose or not. You can totes question someone on their RVS.
I don't get why you're classifying my arguments as "white knighting" when I'm just trying to understand where this argument is coming from. It really doesn't feel all that important.
Funny, voting someone for acting scummy isn't all that important... but giving a player the third degree for casting a random vote on somebody that hasn't even posted yet (and thus having no interaction to analyze) is somehow justifiable?
Moonlogic.
It seems justifiable to me. The game hadn't started, aphix isn't sure how to get the game started, aphix is overaggressive, not to mention that I've never regarded overly aggressive questioning as a bad thing."Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.-
-
House Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 19605
- Joined: September 5, 2014
- Location: Home of Top Gun
In post 54, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 31, House wrote:Hi all!
VOTE: aphix
You sure are digging in your heels on an RVS vote, and the deliberate misrep means more coming from an SE than if it had simply been a newbie.
Serious vote is serious. RVS over.
Aphix is undoubtedly my strongest town read for his attempts to get the game started. I don't think the misrep had any scum motivation behind it: he was bored because the game was going slowly, and so he pressured Klingon to get a reaction out of him and jumped the gun too hard when looking for contradictions.
I actually agree with you. Shinobi is the one that has pinged my scumdar with irrational excuses and deflection.
VOTE: Shinobi-
-
Nachomamma8 Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Posts: 38382
- Joined: June 5, 2009
- Location: Chicago
In post 44, House wrote:Shinobi or aphix, I want to hear from one of you an explanation on how a player can suspect someone of being scum that hasn't even posted.
I refuse to address either of you until one of you explains this sort of strategy.
The only legitimate reasons to have a serious suspicion on a player who hasn't posted are 1) night info, or 2) town reads on the rest of the playerlist. Since these are both illegitimate at this point in the game, I find it pretty reasonable for aphix to call someone out when he sees them with a scumread on a non posting player. Sure, he interpreted it incorrectly, but I don't see strong reasoning for scum to misrep town on page 2 of a game: it's not like he's getting a mislynch out of it."Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.-
-
Nachomamma8 Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Posts: 38382
- Joined: June 5, 2009
- Location: Chicago
-
-
House Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 19605
- Joined: September 5, 2014
- Location: Home of Top Gun
In post 55, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 43, House wrote:In post 42, Shinobi wrote:It doesn't matter if RVS has a purpose or not. You can totes question someone on their RVS.
I don't get why you're classifying my arguments as "white knighting" when I'm just trying to understand where this argument is coming from. It really doesn't feel all that important.
Funny, voting someone for acting scummy isn't all that important... but giving a player the third degree for casting a random vote on somebody that hasn't even posted yet (and thus having no interaction to analyze) is somehow justifiable?
Moonlogic.
It seems justifiable to me. The game hadn't started, aphix isn't sure how to get the game started, aphix is overaggressive, not to mention that I've never regarded overly aggressive questioning as a bad thing.
Aggressive and logical is good, but twisting a person's words to pressure them is b/s.-
-
Shinobi Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: February 12, 2014
- Location: NC
In post 56, House wrote:In post 54, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 31, House wrote:Hi all!
VOTE: aphix
You sure are digging in your heels on an RVS vote, and the deliberate misrep means more coming from an SE than if it had simply been a newbie.
Serious vote is serious. RVS over.
Aphix is undoubtedly my strongest town read for his attempts to get the game started. I don't think the misrep had any scum motivation behind it: he was bored because the game was going slowly, and so he pressured Klingon to get a reaction out of him and jumped the gun too hard when looking for contradictions.
I actually agree with you. Shinobi is the one that has pinged my scumdar with irrational excuses and deflection.
VOTE: Shinobi
I fail to see anything scummy about my posts, but maybe I'm biased.
Could you explain without simplifying my posts into nothingness?-
-
aphix Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1350
- Joined: September 2, 2013
In post 59, House wrote:In post 55, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 43, House wrote:In post 42, Shinobi wrote:It doesn't matter if RVS has a purpose or not. You can totes question someone on their RVS.
I don't get why you're classifying my arguments as "white knighting" when I'm just trying to understand where this argument is coming from. It really doesn't feel all that important.
Funny, voting someone for acting scummy isn't all that important... but giving a player the third degree for casting a random vote on somebody that hasn't even posted yet (and thus having no interaction to analyze) is somehow justifiable?
Moonlogic.
It seems justifiable to me. The game hadn't started, aphix isn't sure how to get the game started, aphix is overaggressive, not to mention that I've never regarded overly aggressive questioning as a bad thing.
Aggressive and logical is good, but twisting a person's words to pressure them is b/s.
Hardly twisting words. Perhaps you are reading too much into the caps that are there because my phone weirded out and I wasn't going to go back and retype everything.-
-
Shinobi Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: February 12, 2014
- Location: NC
-
-
Shinobi Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: February 12, 2014
- Location: NC
-
-
Klingoncelt Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: September 28, 2014
- Location: Under A Raging Moon
In post 29, aphix wrote:So why the vote on him?
So why not?
Is there some rule I'm unaware of that says that you're allowed to tell the noobs how to vote?
Your overreaction to an RVS vote makes it pretty clear, you and Nacho are scumbuddies.
Okay, game over, Town wins.
Yay!
In/next-
-
Klingoncelt Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: September 28, 2014
- Location: Under A Raging Moon
In post 61, aphix wrote:In post 59, House wrote:In post 55, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 43, House wrote:In post 42, Shinobi wrote:It doesn't matter if RVS has a purpose or not. You can totes question someone on their RVS.
I don't get why you're classifying my arguments as "white knighting" when I'm just trying to understand where this argument is coming from. It really doesn't feel all that important.
Funny, voting someone for acting scummy isn't all that important... but giving a player the third degree for casting a random vote on somebody that hasn't even posted yet (and thus having no interaction to analyze) is somehow justifiable?
Moonlogic.
It seems justifiable to me. The game hadn't started, aphix isn't sure how to get the game started, aphix is overaggressive, not to mention that I've never regarded overly aggressive questioning as a bad thing.
Aggressive and logical is good, but twisting a person's words to pressure them is b/s.
Hardly twisting words. Perhaps you are reading too much into the caps that are there because my phone weirded out and I wasn't going to go back and retype everything.
It wasnothing buttwisting words.-
-
Klingoncelt Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: September 28, 2014
- Location: Under A Raging Moon
In post 57, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 44, House wrote:Shinobi or aphix, I want to hear from one of you an explanation on how a player can suspect someone of being scum that hasn't even posted.
I refuse to address either of you until one of you explains this sort of strategy.
The only legitimate reasons to have a serious suspicion on a player who hasn't posted are 1) night info, or 2) town reads on the rest of the playerlist. Since these are both illegitimate at this point in the game, I find it pretty reasonable for aphix to call someone out when he sees them with a scumread on a non posting player. Sure, he interpreted it incorrectly, but I don't see strong reasoning for scum to misrep town on page 2 of a game: it's not like he's getting a mislynch out of it.
Umm, letmethinkaboutitno.
He flipped out over my RVSing an IC. He didn't say shit about you being a lurker. Nor did I.
You two are terrible as Scum.-
-
Nachomamma8 Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Posts: 38382
- Joined: June 5, 2009
- Location: Chicago
In post 62, Shinobi wrote:I actually find it incredibly odd that Nacho did the exact same thing that I just did but says the scumread on me is fine.
It's not like I have a scumread on you for it, I just don't have a town read on you for it. Why is that suspicious?"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.-
-
Nachomamma8 Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Posts: 38382
- Joined: June 5, 2009
- Location: Chicago
In post 59, House wrote:In post 55, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 43, House wrote:In post 42, Shinobi wrote:It doesn't matter if RVS has a purpose or not. You can totes question someone on their RVS.
I don't get why you're classifying my arguments as "white knighting" when I'm just trying to understand where this argument is coming from. It really doesn't feel all that important.
Funny, voting someone for acting scummy isn't all that important... but giving a player the third degree for casting a random vote on somebody that hasn't even posted yet (and thus having no interaction to analyze) is somehow justifiable?
Moonlogic.
It seems justifiable to me. The game hadn't started, aphix isn't sure how to get the game started, aphix is overaggressive, not to mention that I've never regarded overly aggressive questioning as a bad thing.
Aggressive and logical is good, but twisting a person's words to pressure them is b/s.
Then why do you have a town read on him?"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.-
-
Nachomamma8 Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Devil in the Details
- Posts: 38382
- Joined: June 5, 2009
- Location: Chicago
In post 66, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 57, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 44, House wrote:Shinobi or aphix, I want to hear from one of you an explanation on how a player can suspect someone of being scum that hasn't even posted.
I refuse to address either of you until one of you explains this sort of strategy.
The only legitimate reasons to have a serious suspicion on a player who hasn't posted are 1) night info, or 2) town reads on the rest of the playerlist. Since these are both illegitimate at this point in the game, I find it pretty reasonable for aphix to call someone out when he sees them with a scumread on a non posting player. Sure, he interpreted it incorrectly, but I don't see strong reasoning for scum to misrep town on page 2 of a game: it's not like he's getting a mislynch out of it.
Umm, letmethinkaboutitno.
He flipped out over my RVSing an IC. He didn't say shit about you being a lurker. Nor did I.
You two are terrible as Scum.
House stated that Aphix bringing up the possibility of you thinking I was scum didn't make sense because you would have no legitimate reason to suspect someone who hadn't posted. I agreed there was no legitimate reason to suspect someone who hadn't posted, then pointed out that would actually be a pretty solid reason to question someone."Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.-
-
Klingoncelt Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: September 28, 2014
- Location: Under A Raging Moon
Aphix post 16: "Klingon: Why the IC vote? Classic newbie scum move there."
Aphix post 23: "Still doesn't explain to me why the IC?"
Where in those quotes does anyone see the word "lurker?"
Nowhere, that's where.
I never said anything about Nacho lurking.
Someone's lying about my RVS vote.
Which is now a serious vote.-
-
Klingoncelt Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: September 28, 2014
- Location: Under A Raging Moon
In post 70, Klingoncelt wrote:Aphix post 16: "Klingon: Why the IC vote? Classic newbie scum move there."
Aphix post 23: "Still doesn't explain to me why the IC?"
Where in those quotes does anyone see the word "lurker?"
Nowhere, that's where.
I never said anything about Nacho lurking.
Someone's lying about my RVS vote.
Which is now a serious vote.
No, wait, I posted that too soon while highly distracted.
Nacho, are you Aphix's Scum Buddy?
Aphix, why are you White Knighting Nacho? Why are so so after a noob in her very first game here?
And, Aphix, why the OMGUS vote on Jagged Appliance?-
-
Klingoncelt Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: September 28, 2014
- Location: Under A Raging Moon
-
-
fferyllt Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Posts: 20513
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Location: Left Coast
Hast thou the flower there? Welcome, wanderer.-
-
fferyllt Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Posts: 20513
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Location: Left Coast
Ay, there it is.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.