Reck's Retrospective Rehash - OVER (thx obama)

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:43 am

Seriously.

Iecerint · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:44 am

In post 347, ChannelDelibird wrote:This wgeurts wagon makes me a little bit physically sick. Get back on Nexus, Iec.

OK.

Unvote; Vote: Nexus

Iecerint · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:52 am

I still think his reads are pretty dumb tho.

I mainly wanted to see what would happen if I did that re: his behavior, and he's already behaved.

I guess he's used to a funky meta.

ooba · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:56 am

Lol at the wgeurts wagon.

Triforce: "Furthermore, after being called out by multiple people for lack of content," - I could find only one post (by you) btw.

Unvote. Vote: Triforce

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:57 am

triforce is... an interesting vote

ooba · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:01 am

@Iece: I'm null on UT, SK for now

In post 340, Iecerint wrote:
ooba wrote:Current reads:

4burner
- Town

50 shades
- Mostly Town

Chevre
- Town, although the UT vote was weird

I'd like to see more Iece in this thread.

Unvote. Vote: ZZZX

I am kinda surprised that Ooba isn't thinking much about the same constellation of posters as me.
I probably maybe agree with his townreads
, though.

wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE: 50 shades
Town: Triforce, Shenobi,
50 Shades, 4 burner, Chevre

VOTE: Untrod Tripod
reasons later.

Iece wrote:
I still think his reads are pretty dumb tho
.

ISO · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:07 am

Untrod Tripod starts by starting a PL wagon against ZZZX. Then he starts a little absoultely contentless, scum-hunting less and useless discussion on the mass claim.To save you all an iso here they are:

In post 207, Untrod Tripod wrote:YO

day 1 massclaims are a bad fucking idea

why the fuck are we talking about it?

In post 211, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 208, Chevre wrote:Because it's a topic that deserves discussion rather than simple proclamations of whether it's good or not. Especially since it is not a massclaim.

no

it's bad

you're wrong

In post 222, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 218, Chevre wrote:
In post 211, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 208, Chevre wrote:Because it's a topic that deserves discussion rather than simple proclamations of whether it's good or not. Especially since it is not a massclaim.

no

it's bad

you're wrong

Would you say these posts you're making are more helpful than those actually discussing the gameclaim?
yes. I'm not engaging in stupid bullshittery, you stupid clownfuck

But youre town so whatevs

He also tries to continue the zx wagon in various posts still going by the pl reasons. There was at the time of manh of these posts a little content to actuslly base something off however he still wants a policy lynch. The rest of his posts are little useless comments on play trying to look town. I suggest people look at his is, no scum hunting or content what so ever.

ISO · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:08 am

Also plz ignore the typos, I made this on phone.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:09 am

ISO · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:14 am

Yeah, posts like that.

Triforce · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:17 am

In post 335, wgeurts wrote:Triforce, you're actually calling me scum for asking a question on meta that changes site to site?
You haven't exactly posted a lot of content either however I'm town reading you for your jump on me. Expect more reads later.

I'm calling you scum based on the fact that your positing history

on this very site

indicates that you are well aware that a simple majority is required to lynch in MafiaScum games. You are clearly feigning ignorance, while at the same time failing to provide any content. You sound like a scumbaggo and smell like a scumbaggo, so yeah. I'm calling you one.

ooba · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:19 am

In post 360, Triforce wrote:
In post 335, wgeurts wrote:Triforce, you're actually calling me scum for asking a question on meta that changes site to site?
You haven't exactly posted a lot of content either however I'm town reading you for your jump on me. Expect more reads later.

I'm calling you scum based on the fact that your positing history
on this very site
indicates that you are well aware that a simple majority is required to lynch in MafiaScum games. You are clearly feigning ignorance, while at the same time failing to provide any content. You sound like a scumbaggo and smell like a scumbaggo, so yeah. I'm calling you one.

Whats the scum motivation to lie?

ISO · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:22 am

I'm used to a 2/3 majority yes.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:27 am

In post 359, wgeurts wrote:Yeah, posts like that.

oh fuck off

vote: wgeurts

ZZZX · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:30 am

Well i have no idea how to take that question of majority. Its safe enough to consider it a reaction test? because I cant see scum motivation from that question...

UT appears to be town. He was time the last town he went derp on me.

And I am sorry about not doing the promised post but I was a little ill yesterday and ended up sleeping all day as soon as I got home. :<

As soon as I finish my assignments and stuff I will get to ya guys.

-ZZZX

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:33 am

In post 364, ZZZX wrote:UT appears to be town. He was time the last town he went derp on me.

are you referring to cave story mafia?

because

you were scum that game

pirate mollie · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:51 am

In post 335, wgeurts wrote:Triforce, you're actually calling me scum for asking a question on meta that changes site to site?
You haven't exactly posted a lot of content either however I'm town reading you for your jump on me. Expect more reads later.

I am also interested in how you agreed with majiffy about desp being the new buldey when buldey hasn't posted on this site in forever.

pirate mollie · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:02 am

In post 361, ooba wrote:
In post 360, Triforce wrote:
In post 335, wgeurts wrote:Triforce, you're actually calling me scum for asking a question on meta that changes site to site?
You haven't exactly posted a lot of content either however I'm town reading you for your jump on me. Expect more reads later.

I'm calling you scum based on the fact that your positing history
on this very site
indicates that you are well aware that a simple majority is required to lynch in MafiaScum games. You are clearly feigning ignorance, while at the same time failing to provide any content. You sound like a scumbaggo and smell like a scumbaggo, so yeah. I'm calling you one.

Whats the scum motivation to lie?

newb card?

50 Shades of Purple · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:06 am

In post 367, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 361, ooba wrote:
In post 360, Triforce wrote:
In post 335, wgeurts wrote:Triforce, you're actually calling me scum for asking a question on meta that changes site to site?
You haven't exactly posted a lot of content either however I'm town reading you for your jump on me. Expect more reads later.

I'm calling you scum based on the fact that your positing history
on this very site
indicates that you are well aware that a simple majority is required to lynch in MafiaScum games. You are clearly feigning ignorance, while at the same time failing to provide any content. You sound like a scumbaggo and smell like a scumbaggo, so yeah. I'm calling you one.

Whats the scum motivation to lie?

newb card?

In post 366, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 335, wgeurts wrote:Triforce, you're actually calling me scum for asking a question on meta that changes site to site?
You haven't exactly posted a lot of content either however I'm town reading you for your jump on me. Expect more reads later.

I am also interested in how you agreed with majiffy about desp being the new buldey when buldey hasn't posted on this site in forever.

pick up

SleepyKrew · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:16 am

Yo Iec why am I obvtown?
This Nexus wagon is still nice and cozy.

Triforce · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:55 am

In post 361, ooba wrote:
In post 360, Triforce wrote:
In post 335, wgeurts wrote:Triforce, you're actually calling me scum for asking a question on meta that changes site to site?
You haven't exactly posted a lot of content either however I'm town reading you for your jump on me. Expect more reads later.

I'm calling you scum based on the fact that your positing history
on this very site
indicates that you are well aware that a simple majority is required to lynch in MafiaScum games. You are clearly feigning ignorance, while at the same time failing to provide any content. You sound like a scumbaggo and smell like a scumbaggo, so yeah. I'm calling you one.

Whats the scum motivation to lie?

What's the scum motivation to waste time pretending to be ignorant instead of making meaningful contributions to the game?

Like, really? Have you ever played mafia before?

I'm going to check w/the mod to make sure I'm not risking breaking any site rules before going into any detail, but I will reiterate that anybody who bothers to chrck wguerts's posting history on MafiaScum can see how plainly fake his ignorance of majority rule is.

As an aside: Out of curiosity, wguerts, what site(s) are you from where 2/3 is the rule? What account(s) do you hold there?

Iecerint · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:58 am

In post 355, ooba wrote:@Iece: I'm null on UT, SK for now

In post 340, Iecerint wrote:
ooba wrote:Current reads:

4burner
- Town

50 shades
- Mostly Town

Chevre
- Town, although the UT vote was weird

I'd like to see more Iece in this thread.

Unvote. Vote: ZZZX

I am kinda surprised that Ooba isn't thinking much about the same constellation of posters as me.
I probably maybe agree with his townreads
, though.

wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE: 50 shades
Town: Triforce, Shenobi,
50 Shades, 4 burner, Chevre

VOTE: Untrod Tripod
reasons later.

Iece wrote:
I still think his reads are pretty dumb tho
.

His reads post, I meant. It's impossible to evaluate them because his activity level surrounding those players has been non-existent. I thought he might pop back and things would become clear if the number of votes ramped up some.

Iecerint · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:01 am

In post 369, SleepyKrew wrote:Yo Iec why am I obvtown?

I thought it was obvious given my caveat that you could be scum with UT.

I came to that conclusion given your response to UT townreading you (a mixture of delight and paranoia). The interaction itself doesn't seem rehearsed, either, which is why I think the case of you being scum with UT is a stretch.

I had pretty nonspecific townesque thoughts about you before that, but nothing I felt very comfortable with or could articulate the reasons for, so I don't know what UT's comment was based on in particular, if that's what you're asking. Can't offer insight.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:02 am

Oh I think I am seeing what Triforce is meaning.
I don't like how they tried to use his wiki work against him though. That seems unrelated to me, unless he has worked on a page about lynch mechanics.

PEDIT: cool

Iecerint · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:03 am

In post 356, wgeurts wrote:Untrod Tripod starts by starting a PL wagon against ZZZX. Then he starts a little absoultely contentless, scum-hunting less and useless discussion on the mass claim.To save you all an iso here they are:

In post 207, Untrod Tripod wrote:YO

day 1 massclaims are a bad fucking idea

why the fuck are we talking about it?

In post 211, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 208, Chevre wrote:Because it's a topic that deserves discussion rather than simple proclamations of whether it's good or not. Especially since it is not a massclaim.

no

it's bad

you're wrong

In post 222, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 218, Chevre wrote:
In post 211, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 208, Chevre wrote:Because it's a topic that deserves discussion rather than simple proclamations of whether it's good or not. Especially since it is not a massclaim.

no

it's bad

you're wrong

Would you say these posts you're making are more helpful than those actually discussing the gameclaim?
yes. I'm not engaging in stupid bullshittery, you stupid clownfuck

But youre town so whatevs

He also tries to continue the zx wagon in various posts still going by the pl reasons. There was at the time of manh of these posts a little content to actuslly base something off however he still wants a policy lynch. The rest of his posts are little useless comments on play trying to look town. I suggest people look at his is, no scum hunting or content what so ever.

FWIW IIRC he did silly policy lynchesque stuff in another recent large game (Reckoning III) IIRC, and it made me scumread him there.

Not saying I think he's town, but I can understand maybe reading too much into this particular point may turn out differently than expected.

Scummy town meta is

scummy

obnoxious, but.