In post 524, Shiro wrote:Btw Blue in post 420 you said "scrap that Nether is town"
Did one post really make you do a 180 turn ?
No, I ISO'd him.
In post 524, Shiro wrote:Btw Blue in post 420 you said "scrap that Nether is town"
Did one post really make you do a 180 turn ?
In post 477, Netherspite wrote:So basically you consider players town just because they're "too scummy to be scum"?
In post 477, Netherspite wrote:I'm starting to get crazy thought that the scum in my wagon is toolenduso, just because of his reasoning for townreads andthat weird attempt to push townie despite being said that he's wrong.
In post 517, Shiro wrote:VDA it is the avatar. I mean look at it. Would you really lynch this adorableness ?
In post 519, Luca Blight wrote:Victor, my thinking in 188 wasn't 'bizarre' at all, what is bizarre is how you've somehow managed to read the opposite of what that post said. Re-read it and you will find I never said Carli was a policy lynch to try and clear Shiro, I was saying it would make sense for scum, at that point, not to hop on any wagon too prematurely, as it seemed as though a Carli lynch was inevitable.
In post 533, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Shiro, can you not ask for votes on yourself please.
Thanks.
VDA, that's a bad vote.
Let's lynch Nether instead.
In post 473, Luca Blight wrote:I don't know, I don't like how she had posted (welcoming the replacements into the game) then Toffee asked why she wasn't voting, and she just basically complied and voted straight away.
In post 473, Luca Blight wrote:Why hadn't she voted in that initial post if that was her genuine intention when Carli replaced out? She also asked a question to TGGC to explain Carli's actions after her vote, putting him at L-1 before he'd even started. Why didn't she ask him before the vote to try and gauge his reaction?
In post 473, Luca Blight wrote:You wonder why would scumShiro make that vote, I'm failing to see why TownShiro would.
In post 529, Netherspite wrote:I am that townie and the one who said you that you're wrong is JohnnyFarrar. Read his posts above.
In post 535, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK. You should stop town-reading Nether because of the reason I am voting him for.
Now that you have gone and checked why I'm voting him (go check) you will see he is scum, correct?
Good. Vote Nether please.
In post 539, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't explain town-reads.
Why do you think Shiro is scum?
In post 531, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
305 - One in four as opposed to one in six. That could be a scumslip....hmmm.
In post 531, VictorDeAngelo wrote:315 - Wait, why is Nether ISOing himself here? Did I miss something. I'm going skip the content and just worry about the fact that Nether is ISOing himself for no reason. I'm starting to see where this wagon on him came from.
In post 537, toolenduso wrote:
So...you think that I should stop voting for a scumread because other people think I'm wrong about that scumread?
In post 539, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't explain town-reads.
In post 466, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Explaining town-reads accomplishes nothing. Anybody can fake a town-read, whereas it's a lot more difficult for scum to fabricate a scum-read. Therefore, I like people to explain their scum-reads rather than me explain a town-read.
In post 541, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I have, but catch-up posts are just too easy to make look pro-town.
So, let's have a summary of your reasons for voting Shiro.
In post 542, Netherspite wrote:In post 531, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
305 - One in four as opposed to one in six. That could be a scumslip....hmmm.
If scum has a roleblocker then there is no setup where doc can't be CCed so they wouldn't fake claim in this case.
iirc it was discussed in the posts around it.
In post 531, VictorDeAngelo wrote:315 - Wait, why is Nether ISOing himself here? Did I miss something. I'm going skip the content and just worry about the fact that Nether is ISOing himself for no reason. I'm starting to see where this wagon on him came from.
Because I said in the beginning that I'll explain all my questions and their results.
@VictorDeAngelo
Since you have more experience, do you think thatBlueBloodedToffee's manner to scumhunt (random voting people for lurking or single post, not giving any explanations besides weak ones for his random votes) is okay for townie? I just don't understand how this can be considered a good townplay.
In post 542, Netherspite wrote:You didn't refute his arguments so I assumed that you agree with them.
In post 546, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Scum may claim doc to lure out a CC - particularly if TGGC was resigned to the lynch.
In post 546, VictorDeAngelo wrote:But why do this?
In post 546, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In a newbie game I think a more detail orientated posting is better, but that's not the way everyone plays and I've probably got towngames even in this forum where I've thrown out naked votes. Still people have different styles and I won't comment on how effective it is until I see results.
In post 547, toolenduso wrote:Also, could you point me to the post where Johnny refuted my points against Nether?
In post 545, toolenduso wrote:
In post 466, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Explaining town-reads accomplishes nothing. Anybody can fake a town-read, whereas it's a lot more difficult for scum to fabricate a scum-read. Therefore, I like people to explain their scum-reads rather than me explain a town-read.
OK, so that's a reason not to explain townreadsunless somebody asks you to.If explaining townreads doesn't accomplish anything, why not just humor the people who are asking you and do it? Is there some downside to explaining townreads I'm not seeing here?
There is a point to explaining townreads, because scum have to fake townreads just as much as they have to fake scumreads -- they have to make townreads look like they're coming from scumhunting and not from actual knowledge of the person's alignment.