Open 572: Nightless Vengeful Mayhem - Game Over


User avatar
Not_Mafia
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
User avatar
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
Smash Hit
Posts: 23538
Joined: February 5, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym

Post Post #1775 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:23 am

Post by Not_Mafia »

VC 6.10
ArcAngel9 (0)-

Shaddowez (1)-
Thor665
Thor665 (1)-
droog
droog (1)-
Fink
Fink (0)-

Green Crayons (0)-


Not Voting (3)-
ArcAngel9, Green Crayons, Shaddowez

With
6
alive, it takes
4
to lynch.


Deadline is in
(expired on 2014-11-25 20:00:00)
- Nov 25th 20:00 GMT
Last edited by Not_Mafia on Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:49 am, edited 2 times in total.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1776 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:15 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1774, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1773, Thor665 wrote:I think he's confirmed town.

Is this humor?

I dunno, you're probably obligated to look at my vote and my last few comments and then assess them against Droog's question in order to take in my true opinion and attitude towards the question.

Is your comment humor?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1777 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:29 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Instead of not answering the question, you can answer the question.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1778 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:32 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Here, I'll even provide my follow up question, since it appears that you don't like a conversation going in a step-by-step fashion:

If it is humor, then what is your real response to this question:
In post 1772, droog wrote:whats your shaddowez read
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1779 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:35 am

Post by Thor665 »

I did answer the question - it's a serious and quite functional answer.

Do you think anything I have posted beyond a single post qualifies to show that I think that Shaddowez is confirmed town? Y'know, between my calls to lynch him and me quite recently planting a vote on him?
But then there is one post where I call him confirmed town after someone asks me for my read on him, immediately after I get done suggesting a scumteam containing him.
Also I maintain my vote.
Go ahead, use your gray matter, it hurts a bit at first but it gets easier and helps you do things.

So, I ask again, is your comment humor?
Because it's starting to seem less and less clever.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1780 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:35 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Unless if this is your sole basis for your shaddow read?

In post 1753, Thor665 wrote:I have explained the Droog read already, do you not understand part of it?
The Shaddowez one is more relational and PoE and is best summed up as 'townreading Fink and Phil, and not really seeing a Droog/Dyx connection'
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1781 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:36 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1778, Green Crayons wrote:If it is humor, then what is your real response to this question:

:neutral:
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1782 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:37 am

Post by Green Crayons »

lol

Must be such a hard life being the smartest person in the world.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1783 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:38 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1771, Thor665 wrote:No one is asking me questions, you are obv. skimscum.

Here is my most recent post on Shaddowez not counting Droog's question.

As you can clearly see - I am calling him confirmed town and defending him.
You guys should all ease off him immediately, he is so town it hurts.
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1784 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:38 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1782, Green Crayons wrote:lol

Must be such a hard life being the smartest person in the world.

I'm not claiming to be the smartest guy in the world.
All I'm asking is that people, y'know, read the game.

Why are you even asking for this clarification? Like Drooga re you lost as to my read on Shaddowez? Like, you think my opinion there is currently unclear?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1785 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:41 am

Post by Green Crayons »

1763 you voted shaddow. Only apparent reason for doing so (in that post -- I have also referenced 1753 where you have cited POE) was because of my post highlighting one event where it looked like shaddow was active lurking.

1770 shaddow asserted you weren't answering questions.

1771 you called shaddow "skimscum" for his 1770 post. Obviously, being "skimscum" was not part of your shaddow-is-scum read when you voted for him in 1763. Unless if you mentioned it before 1763? If not, it's just something you've said after the fact of voting him, and therefore is a late addition to your "case."
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1786 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:42 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Because I want the full breadth of your reasons for voting shaddow at all, and for voting shaddow over droog.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1787 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:47 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1770, shaddowez wrote:Please, explain how once instance from over a month ago qualifies, especially when you decide to not look at any of the surrounding points. First, my response, while two posts later was an hour later. Secondly, 883, the very next post, was from me, as promised. Care to misrep me more?

:roll:

1) What does it being over a month ago have to do with anything?
2) A one hour gap is not a long delay for a forum game between a "hey where is Player X" post and Player X popping in and saying "sup dudes I'm here."
3) The followup post about suspicions is irrelevant to whether you appeared as soon as summoned.
4) Not a misrep. Nice use of hyper-defensive phrasing for a one time event (haven't seen any other examples of call-and-response activity) that just happened to catch my eye in the read through as being really on the nose in terms of active lurking.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1788 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:51 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1786, Green Crayons wrote:Because I want the full breadth of your reasons for voting shaddow at all, and for voting shaddow over droog.

I voted Shaddowez over Droog because I think he's the better lynch today and you were the first player to even admit that he looked questionable and I wanted to strike while the iron was hot.

So, vote him now, yeah?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1789 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:57 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Still at page 40, and should be making headway today, but so far the only basis that I see for voting shaddow is because of his semi-lurk status - which he has repeatedly stated (again, up through Page 40) as being more attributable to his inability to post during weekends than anything else. The only reason for me to doubt his less than active posting style within the universe of this game is literally that summoning response I quoted.

Effort, but if I wanted to actually pursue that line of thinking to a vote, I'd need to compare shaddow's activity in this game against his activity in other games during this time period. But he's only third of my list of acceptable votes, so I'm going to avoid that work at the moment.


In addition to this, it appears that you're stating I should vote him also because he's skimming and because of POE. For now my position is no thanks.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1790 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:01 am

Post by Thor665 »

Just wait till you read another 30 pages of it, then restate your thoughts.
User avatar
droog
droog
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
droog
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5242
Joined: September 20, 2014

Post Post #1791 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:04 am

Post by droog »

In post 1788, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1786, Green Crayons wrote:Because I want the full breadth of your reasons for voting shaddow at all, and for voting shaddow over droog.

I voted Shaddowez over Droog because I think he's the better lynch today and you were the
first player to even admit that he looked questionable
and I wanted to strike while the iron was hot.

So, vote him now, yeah?


Is this including or excluding yourslef
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1792 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:09 am

Post by Thor665 »

Obviously it wasn't counting me because at no point did I suggest we should ever lynch Shaddow the uber town.

Why are you asking these nonsensical questions?
User avatar
droog
droog
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
droog
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5242
Joined: September 20, 2014

Post Post #1793 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:40 am

Post by droog »

In post 1791, droog wrote:
In post 1788, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1786, Green Crayons wrote:Because I want the full breadth of your reasons for voting shaddow at all, and for voting shaddow over droog.

I voted Shaddowez over Droog because I think he's the better lynch today and you were the
first player to even admit that he looked questionable
and I wanted to strike while the iron was hot.

So, vote him now, yeah?


Is this including or excluding yourslef


Is this including or excluding yourslef
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1794 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 12:39 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1793, droog wrote:
In post 1791, droog wrote:
In post 1788, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1786, Green Crayons wrote:Because I want the full breadth of your reasons for voting shaddow at all, and for voting shaddow over droog.

I voted Shaddowez over Droog because I think he's the better lynch today and you were the
first player to even admit that he looked questionable
and I wanted to strike while the iron was hot.

So, vote him now, yeah?


Is this including or excluding yourslef


Is this including or excluding yourslef

Is this humor?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1795 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 1:13 pm

Post by Thor665 »

I'm of the opinion that literally none of you are reading the game right now.
Feel free to prove me wrong, i actually am a masochist and will love having my face rubbed in that.
User avatar
shaddowez
shaddowez
He/Him
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
shaddowez
He/Him
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2604
Joined: May 28, 2014
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #1796 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:22 pm

Post by shaddowez »

So, at the risk of this looking like an OMGUS vote, I'm going to do this anyway:

VOTE: Thor

He seemed to be making sense most of the game, but now that it's getting down to the wire and there are less other people to pay attention to, he's blatantly not working with the rest of town. He's also discussed lylo a couple of times, making it sound like he knows we're going to mislynch and end up there. I don't like it.
V/LA on Weekends
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1797 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:24 pm

Post by Thor665 »

Uh-huh.
User avatar
droog
droog
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
droog
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5242
Joined: September 20, 2014

Post Post #1798 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:03 pm

Post by droog »

In post 1794, Green Crayons wrote:Is this humor?


here's why i asked twice:

thor has said that you were the first to suspect shaddowez
mind: thor has been pushing a shaddowez lynch all day
and said it was because he
didnt have a read on shaddowez

when i asked him for a shaddowez read, he gave poe
when i asked again.... he implied that he's had a really clear, consistent read all this time

...
...
...

while saying that you were the first to suspect shaddowez
User avatar
ArcAngel9
ArcAngel9
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ArcAngel9
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8517
Joined: December 11, 2012
Location: India

Post Post #1799 (ISO) » Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:11 pm

Post by ArcAngel9 »

deadline is about 14 hours.. WE gotta get some wagon going today...

Green crayons..where are you with your catch up?
I
n
a
t
i
m
e
o
f
a
n
c
i
e
n
t
g
o
d
s
,
w
a
r
l
o
r
d
s
a
n
d
k
i
n
g
s
,
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
t
u
r
m
o
i
l
c
r
i
e
d
o
u
t
f
o
r
a
h
e
r
o
.
S
h
e
w
a
s
X
e
n
a
,
a
m
i
g
h
t
y
p
r
i
n
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
g
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
h
e
a
t
o
f
b
a
t
t
l
e
.
T
h
e
p
o
w
e
r
,
t
h
e
p
a
s
s
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
d
a
n
g
e
r
.
H
e
r
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
w
i
l
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
t
h
e
w
o
r
l
d
-
Xena Warrior Princess, Coming Soon!!

Return to “Completed Open Games”