In post 1846, Green Crayons wrote:Truth be told, though, I'm actually more interested in pursuing my shaddow suspicions. I didn't think I would back when I paused on Page 40, but I'm going to look into that next.
Yes.
In post 1846, Green Crayons wrote:Truth be told, though, I'm actually more interested in pursuing my shaddow suspicions. I didn't think I would back when I paused on Page 40, but I'm going to look into that next.
In post 1854, Green Crayons wrote:@Thor:if shaddow flips town, there's nobody left in your POE that could be buddy to droog-scum. What then for the LYLO vote?
In post 1856, Thor665 wrote:Though, to be honest, if one of them flipped town I'd probably still want to lynch the other.
In post 1859, ArcAngel9 wrote:In post 1856, Thor665 wrote:Though, to be honest, if one of them flipped town I'd probably still want to lynch the other.
How about we lynch you today and lynch droog tomorrow based on how you slip?
In post 1856, Thor665 wrote:Though, to be honest, if one of them flipped town I'd probably still want to lynch the other.
In post 1863, Green Crayons wrote:@Thor:
In post 1856, Thor665 wrote:Though, to be honest, if one of them flipped town I'd probably still want to lynch the other.
This strikes me as odd. The scumflip of one seems to be a not insubstantial part of why you are scumreading the other (moreso for shaddow than droog, admittedly). If one doesn't scumflip, that wouldn't cause you to rethink your suspicion of the other?