In post 759, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: rudolph
i wonder how far i can get into this game before people start scumreading me for not writing a case
i dont want to write a case
In post 763, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:In post 762, acryon wrote:I would like to add that one of the key points of my arguments that continues to be overlooked is C+A misrepresentation. This has been written off my Math mostly as just miscommunication, but it's a little disingenuous to say my case was entirely playstyle-related. You can look at my ISO to see that it was more than that.
haha i remember hearing this recently
VOTE: cane and able
come one come all
In post 947, acryon wrote:
He has voted twice. Once for C+A who had 0 votes, and then on you, which could be categorized as jumping on randomly.
You were the 3rd vote on Orcinus in 5 posts.
And the two of you said almost the exact same thing of each other's wagons (that is, basically nothing).
In post 937, Cane + Able wrote:- House
In post 944, acryon wrote:In post 942, copper223 wrote:Lol I'm sure you always have 3 scumreads D1.
@All
Can we lynch this guy? I was about to post the same as C+A about wanting out if he continued but I like a lot of players here so I'd rather get rid of the problem, or maybe he is playing like this to be disruptive as mafia, one can only hope and that would at least make sense somewhat.
VOTE: Orcinus
I fear that this town is latching onto an Orcinus lynch because they don't like his playstyle or way of talking to people. I don't particularly either, but he isn't scum for it. Let's call it what it is; this is primarily a policy wagon.
In post 941, acryon wrote:In post 824, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:In post 821, acryon wrote:Maybe we can get some updated reads to see where people are at, but last I checked, there was no way a C+A lynch would every happen today.
ok so this rings very off to me because there's 5 days left and i have no idea why you're trying to play the diplomacy game especially since replacements shake up gamestate by their very nature and i'm playing along with you as hard as i can and you are not taking my olive branch and i don't know why
hmmmm.
I'm not at all. No offense, but if you actually read through the thread when I presented my case on C+A, there was incredibly strong resistance to basically every part of the case, so C+A would have to do something particularly egregious to get people to change their minds.
In post 838, Cane + Able wrote:Imagine a cop coming up to you as a child and saying you broke the law, and when you respond, "I'm six", he replies "well your uncle that you see once a year knows better!"
It's bullshit.
While I agree that part of my premise for that part of the argument may have been flawed, this seems like an absurd way to describe what a hydra actually is.
In post 917, Cane + Able wrote:Methinks TTH really, super honestly doesn't know much about this Wake freak. I, I think she's only played with me once, and I daresay she's not familiar with my six years of experience or the way I deliberately change patterns to try and be less readable. It does feel rather overconfident to deduce how I play from one game, but don't mind me, I'm just the dude in the corner getting gabbed about.
In post 951, texcat wrote:Actually, he has voted 3 times. And while I didn't comment in the post where I voted, I had previously commented on Orc's scum hunting, or lack of scum hunting.
In post 953, Cane + Able wrote:It's a pretty accurate description of this particular hydra, if you've been paying attention at all. Not blaming Wake, he has much more important things to deal with. I'm blaming you for leveraging his experience against me when he simply hadn't been participating.
- House
Do you have any actual interest in scum hunting this game?
In post 923, texcat wrote:LOL, no, it was an entirely rhetorical question. But here's some real questions. Have you read the thread yet? Do you plan on doing so? I will admit that at 37 pages it is somewhat of a slog. I found the 8 or so new pages today to be a little intimidating.
In post 965, copper223 wrote:If he was abrasive alone that would not warrant a vote, but do you want to even compare his entry posts to Boo and TTH? Who looks more town to you? He wasted 3 pages and 1 day creating havoc close to the deadline, this is a fact, did he do it soley cause he has an axe to grind with House and is naturally abrasive, or is it scum play? I do not know and the way you just absolve him is bad WIFOM from you, I see no better lynch at the time based on empirical facts and not on playstile.
In post 965, copper223 wrote:Instead of giving reads his starting posts screm: who do we (mis)lynch, he actually asked us who he should sheep on, by the questions he asked later and the follow the cop plan he proposed it is evident he did not even read the thread, now tell me which alignment does this look more like to you?
In post 972, Bookitty wrote:it's my belief that if he were scum we'd be screwed
