In post 970, copper223 wrote:Lol, if he claimed scum will you say: because town is never dumb, and move on?
Of course not, but you're trying to say not reading the thread is alignment-indicative, and I disagree.
In post 970, copper223 wrote:Lol, if he claimed scum will you say: because town is never dumb, and move on?
In post 977, copper223 wrote:@Acryon
Rudi should be unlynchable for you given your treatment of Orcinus, why is it not the case?
In post 975, acryon wrote:Of course not, but you're trying to say not reading the thread is alignment-indicative, and I disagree.
In post 977, copper223 wrote:@Orcinus
Shocking.
@Acryon
Rudi should be unlynchable for you given your treatment of Orcinus, why is it not the case?
In post 976, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Just to confirm, you think that highly of copper's scumgame?
In post 983, copper223 wrote:@Acryon
Do you think that playing overall to your win-con is alignment indicative?
In post 983, copper223 wrote:Regarding Rudi: You are taking the stance here that Orcinus is likely not mafia because he is to brazen about it, Rudi also was brazen asking us to lynch you despite your claim, why is one a probable town and the other a probable mafia, aside from OMGUS?
In post 917, Cane + Able wrote:Orc saying he doesn't care about Rudolph's alignment in 825 sort of irks me, because generally in Mafia if you're Town you should be concerned about learning players' alignments. I do find it reasonable for Rudy to question why not.
In post 982, Bookitty wrote:In post 976, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Just to confirm, you think that highly of copper's scumgame?
I think that highly of copper's intelligence. Let us leave it at that, please.
In post 988, Bookitty wrote:Leaning town at the moment. Want me to look at him in particular?