In post 573, Wisdom wrote:Why is he town? Also remind me why marquis got townier for you today?
Wondering this as well.
In post 573, Wisdom wrote:Why is he town? Also remind me why marquis got townier for you today?
In post 577, Mathdino wrote:Marquis repeatedly didn't pick the 2 or 3 non-kill boxes I picked out for him.
In post 247, Marquis wrote:revise: you should probably let me live until elephant phase because related topic
In post 579, FuDuzn wrote:Or he could be scum who saw an opportunity for a quick an easy mislynch.
In post 579, FuDuzn wrote:Why are you trying so hard to poke holes in my argument?
In post 579, FuDuzn wrote:Scum move in my opinion to jump all over a potential VI move, town would Give benefit of the doubt intially and would at least wait for Bert to offer an explanation before insta voting.
In post 579, FuDuzn wrote:Oh wait, didn't you insta vote as well wisdom?
In post 580, Mathdino wrote:I am saying that makes him slightly townier than Shinobi.
In post 586, FuDuzn wrote:and here you are knocking my reads because they are different than yours and arrived at them in a different manner than you may.
In post 589, Mathdino wrote:Furthermore I'm actually townreading the fact that FuD starts defending his reads/logic rather than his alignment, as if the latter wasn't really in question.
In post 589, Mathdino wrote:Wisdom's making good points but I'm not seeing the inconsistency with town. Furthermore I'm actually townreading the fact that FuD starts defending his reads/logic rather than his alignment, as if the latter wasn't really in question.
In post 590, Wisdom wrote:Good because here:
In post 586, FuDuzn wrote:and here you are knocking my reads because they are different than yours and arrived at them in a different manner than you may.
You are talking to me like I'm town.
gg
In post 591, Wisdom wrote:In post 589, Mathdino wrote:Furthermore I'm actually townreading the fact that FuD starts defending his reads/logic rather than his alignment, as if the latter wasn't really in question.
This makes no sense. He's defending what I'm attacking.
In post 597, Mathdino wrote:He doesn't say "you're calling me scum based off of 'so-and-so'", he says "you're calling my reads shit because of 'so-and-so'". I find the difference notable.