other thing is that mistef's claim suggests the dog was an SK - unfortunately there is no role information about what roles people are, so, there's no way of knowing right now.
I May or may not have killed the SK, I don't know.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Glork wrote:Primate:
I investigated Thesp N1 (he confirmed that the answers in the dayscene were his). Thesp was not evil.
I investigated DP/Skruffs N2 (Skruffs has confirmed that he recieved a message from him, and that DP's response was in the dayscene). DP/Skruffs was not evil.
I investigated Pooky last night; the reply in the dayscene is his. I don't know if Pooky will confirm this or not, but that's what I did. Pooky is evil.
Pooky -- Did you recieve the message which I sent you last night? Are those *YOUR* responses in the dayscene?
Of course they are
I have no direct effect on the dayscene. The letters found are my targets' own responses to the questions which I sent them.
Pooky's assumption that this alleged gambit involves roleblocking or unnightkillability holds no water. However, it cannot be disproven... it's an incredibly convenient "explanation" as to "Glorkscum's plan," and it's really the only thing that Pooky (whether scum or town) can possibly give.
And you want us to believe scum have no such abilities against an absolutely loaded town, which is more believable Glork? honestly?
If there are any other regular cops out there,NOWis the time to be coming out and counterclaiming me. Go ahead. I dare you. Pooky? Are you going to try to counterclaim me at this point?
I already claimed wiseguy...
Pooky, explainhowandwhyyou feel that my messages from D1 were designed to "create maximum confusion." Just yelling it in all-caps is not going to convince anybody of anything.
Right because questioning the difference between famous versus non famous real cats isn't confusing at all
You claim that "town Miztef" would never reveal his investigation at this time. When would you suggest that "town Miztef" reveal his investigation result?
Beginning of Day, basically ASAP, it's a one shot ability, why wouldn't you reveal right away?
Pooky's claim that "killing massive instead of Primate or Carbon Copy" makes no sense... is horribly flawed. As Primate said, Massive was practically confirmed as an unlynchable innocent, and he could have kept on feeding Primate new lives. I think that made themostsense as a kill choice, since it minimized the ability of prove pro-town players to continue to live.
how does Primate living matter in endgame? he's less confirmed because he could still be scum giving cash to look innocent
And all the while, Pooky is spewing shit like "if this isn't the image of scum on the brink of victory, I don't know what is.
Pooky, cut the rhetoric. You're not going to savvy-talk your way out of anything. Provide hard evidence to support your wild theories, or it will come down to one player's word against another. And, given that I have a proven message-sending ability and no apparent counterclaim to my Cop role, along with a wiki'dactual Famous Catas my rolename, I think that evidence is on my side right now.
Cuz your theories aren't wild at all? look at the three reasons you've given for the hyposituation. complete crap. You won't fakeclaim well because you haven't fakeclaimed well as scum in the past? how the hell does that even make sense? Proven message sending ability means NOTHING in a game like this
DGB's theory about Glork/Nai/Miztef being the scumgroup holdsZEROground, becauseif Nai were scum, then quicklynching him tomorrow would just be lynching a scumbag -- which would not win us the game.
I'm obviously not agreeing with the DGB theory
Pooky, please claim your rolename, any/all abilities you have had during the game, when you have had them and used them, which players you have used them on, and what results (if applicable) came from your use-of-abilities. Do so immediately, as your very next post, before you say anything else. I find it very surprising that, for somebody who has a guilty result claimed against you, you're just yelling about how I must be scum and not even trying to actually defend yourself, your role, or your behavior. Do you really expect all of this "GLORK IS GAMBITING SCUM" shouting to actually convince anybody (other than possibly DGB) that you're right and I'm wrong?
Again I already did
EDIT: Okay, so Pooky has claimed since I began my response. In spite of the fact that NaiTown implies we are at potential LyLo, you have chosen not to replace anybody so far. Why not? You say you're waiting for a "juicy" ability, but what would it matter if you were KILLED or ENDGAMEDbefore you ever got to take a player's ability?
Can you give us any more flavor than "doing ANYTHING"? According to Wikipedia, Dalton was the author of "My Litter Box is Dirty," and a television host. How does this translate into the ability to do ANYTHING?
ok wiseguy, which player would you have replaced? what looks useful in that graveyard? I'm the wondercat, that means I can do anything that needs to be done
Also, I believe that this means everyone has claimed. Pooky, are you insinuating that in a game where (according to you) scum have provable powers, the town has ZERO method-of-investigation to discern these powers other than a blind investigation and an Inventor's investigation (courtesy of DGB) which may not even fall into the town's hands? How do you feel this would affect the balance of the game?
Again if we're speculating on setup balance, I don't think a setup where according to you had MASONED townies in everything but name taking up 7 out of 13 slots is in any way balanced, heck WHY WOULD THE TOWN NEED INVESTIGATIVE POWERS WHEN THEY CAN CONFIRM THE INNOCENCE OF MORE THAN HALF OF THEIR PLAYERS ON DAY ONE? WHAT THE HECK IS THE POINT OF HAVING A COP?