Didn't see them - will answer later.[/quote]
Not good enough.
VOTE: T S O
In post 1073, Aquanim wrote:In post 1072, Netherspite wrote:@davesaz
How on earth can #689 be a reason to vote someone?
I would understand (partially) if you would mention his previous posts where he was pressuring you.
But this specific post has nothing to do with making up a reason to vote someone...
Oh look I'm just going to answer this one...
Dave said "the interaction starting at #689", in which TSO says some stuff about Dave's posting which he completely fails to substantiate and then runs off without voting for Dave.
In post 789, T S O wrote:It kinda feels like scum are designating me as a mislynch with people questioning townreads on me, but I'll town soon.
Vote: davesaz
In post 1076, T S O wrote:You can try to policy lynch me if you want. I know you're mad because I called you bad and that hurt your little pride. I still won't care.
In post 1080, Aquanim wrote:In post 1076, T S O wrote:You can try to policy lynch me if you want. I know you're mad because I called you bad and that hurt your little pride. I still won't care.
You see, there's two options as far as that goes:
1) you had some reason why you thought I was bad and should be lynched
2) you're scum who made shit up to chainsaw for Paschendale
You gonna give me a reason to think it's not (2)?
In post 1081, T S O wrote:In post 1080, Aquanim wrote:In post 1076, T S O wrote:You can try to policy lynch me if you want. I know you're mad because I called you bad and that hurt your little pride. I still won't care.
You see, there's two options as far as that goes:
1) you had some reason why you thought I was bad and should be lynched
2) you're scum who made shit up to chainsaw for Paschendale
You gonna give me a reason to think it's not (2)?
Sure. Like I said,I would answer the questions later.I have this thing called real life on and, believe it or not, it takes precedence over a forum game.
In post 1043, Aquanim wrote:In post 916, T S O wrote:
This needs death.
Why did you think this post and my play in general was worth lynching?
In post 1085, Aquanim wrote:My question's not brilliant and incisive at all. It's very simple. What reasons did you have for saying something? Not that hard a question to answer, if you have reasons.
Your ad hominems are duly noted.
In post 982, Aquanim wrote:
2) If I'm Nether in a scumteam with Paschendale and Luca I'd be distancing myself from Paschendale for the entire game, not tying my fate to his.
In post 982, Aquanim wrote:
I don't really understand how you're not scumreading TSO. He wanders into the thread, blusters a bit about how there's no reason why Paschendale is scum, tries to get something started on dave (the leading wagon besides Paschendale at the time) and then spends more effort than on all of the above trying to discredit me with nothing meaningful.
It's pretty much textbook scum play from where I sit. Maybe you think it's too textbook; but then, if you're TSO and you're on a scumteam with Paschendale and Luca, do you give a damn about this game?
In post 1006, Netherspite wrote:
I've explained why did I vote Luca.
It was a reaction test for you.
In post 1006, Netherspite wrote:
If you'd ask me however, I'd prefer any of the dave/acryon/Mala/TSO lynched first. They are my top scumreads at the moment (don't forget my reads are shit in this game though). I'd like to hear the answers from others I questioned besides Mala before thinking further.
In post 1010, Netherspite wrote:
Mala looks slightly less scummy out of this list though (and I've got the answer I wanted to hear from her).
In post 1014, Aquanim wrote:Here's something I don't say very often...
Does a mass-claim simply solve the game now?
Town has a JK, Vigilante and (Backup) Role Cop. Since Luca was Goon the remaining scum is a Backup JK, which means the Role Cop is essentially a full Cop. By claiming and then shooting/checking/offensive JKing the unconfirmeds... is there any way for that to go wrong?
In post 1022, acryon wrote:
I was V/LA until after the lynch. I am available to post between 7:30A and 4:30P my time. The thread re-opened at 5:30P yesterday, so this is my first opportunity to post. Just correcting you so scum doesn't have a stupid excuse to jump onto some wagon of me.
In post 1022, acryon wrote:
I reluctantly think Nether is probably town. 952 actually read really genuine. If he was scum, he knows he is going to live and will have to end up answering for that post. There is zero benefit for scum to make that statement, and I can only see it really coming from town.
In post 1084, T S O wrote:Bulba, please get your goddamn ass in here.
In post 1093, Bulbazak wrote:In post 982, Aquanim wrote:
2) If I'm Nether in a scumteam with Paschendale and Luca I'd be distancing myself from Paschendale for the entire game, not tying my fate to his.
Except that Pasch was their only active PR, and that can be something that's hard to let go of (Ask TSO. He knows.). That he tried to divert the wagon from Pasch, a PR, to Luca, a goon, is very telling. Also, he even said himself that that scenario would be the only reason he'd pull such a move as scum, and I think he's more than capable as scum to introduce that level of WIFOM to mask his actions.
In post 1014, Aquanim wrote:Here's something I don't say very often...
Does a mass-claim simply solve the game now?
Town has a JK, Vigilante and (Backup) Role Cop. Since Luca was Goon the remaining scum is a Backup JK, which means the Role Cop is essentially a full Cop. By claiming and then shooting/checking/offensive JKing the unconfirmeds... is there any way for that to go wrong?
It might narrow the field, but I think mass claiming is a bad idea. All scum has to do is kill the JK, and they remove our blocking/protective power while gaining it for themselves. It's not worth the risk, especially when we're holding all the cards.
I also don't like Nether's response to this, as he conveniently leaves the JK dying out of all of his equations.