Mini 1625: Redemption (Game Over)

[GGG]

@thor - droog did not claim bulletproof with a hit day 1.

I am inferring that as accounting for one of the no kills from the second faction.

[Whomping Willow]

For a guy claiming to have been pushing on me since Day 1 - your votes do not seem to support that.

How about re-stating the case to remind people of it?

The only person who needs "reminding" is you, and that's because you won't read the game. If you want to participate properly, then do it.

[GGG]

Thor, I agree the CDB lynch didn't make sense. It really was a get the game moving lynch where the wagon that had votes at the time got lymched. When I say we it was the active people in the thread to which in addition to your list I might add Naiomi though she might have gone quiet by then.

I checked - Munkir did not, so he was scum, catching a lot of conversation pressure, who didn't bother to vote the easy lynch. Okay, I can maybe buy that - but if he's scum I have to admit that basically every experience I have says he would only do that if his scumbuddy was already there.

Thor what are you trying to say here I'm not following.

[Thor665]

@thor - droog did not claim bulletproof with a hit day 1.

I am inferring that as accounting for one of the no kills from the second faction.

Did DGB claim that wolves could kill or claim any targets of kill or was caught by targeting a kill?

For a guy claiming to have been pushing on me since Day 1 - your votes do not seem to support that.

How about re-stating the case to remind people of it?

The only person who needs "reminding" is you, and that's because you won't read the game. If you want to participate properly, then do it.

I am so sorry that I am playing the game poorly by doing the unreasonable and asking you to state a case on someone you suspect. This is a highly unusual request, almost never done, and highlights my poor play.

Thor, I agree the CDB lynch didn't make sense. It really was a get the game moving lynch where the wagon that had votes at the time got lymched. When I say we it was the active people in the thread to which in addition to your list I might add Naiomi though she might have gone quiet by then.

This is such an insane thing to read because, by definition, the majority of you need to be town.

Thor what are you trying to say here I'm not following.

I'll answer your question with a question - Why would scum Munkir not vote for CDB?

[Whomping Willow]

For a guy claiming to have been pushing on me since Day 1 - your votes do not seem to support that.

How about re-stating the case to remind people of it?

The only person who needs "reminding" is you, and that's because you won't read the game. If you want to participate properly, then do it.

I am so sorry that I am playing the game poorly by doing the unreasonable and asking you to state a case on someone you suspect. This is a highly unusual request, almost never done, and highlights my poor play.

And I'm saying go read in context why I'm scumreading your slot. I'm not going to "state a case" on you because I know exactly the dance we're going to go through, if you're actually interested in understanding the read on you then you know what to do, otherwise, you've received all the help you'll get from me.

[Thor665]

Link me to the context part I'll need?

[Thor665]

Because I've done the dance before where someone says 'go read' and I do and I come back with 'this is your case' and they say I'm wrong and need to re-state it anyway.
I'm trying to save a lot of wasted time by doing the criminal demand of just asking you a read.
What the hell?
This is super normal.
If it needs context state the ruddy context.
Provide a link.
Outline the case and say the context matters.

But to sit there and go 'no' is just silly, lazy, and anti-town.
No - state your case. Do it. That's how the game is played.

[Thor665]

Revisiting 82 by Originalchris I hate it even more than I did when I first read it, ironically it was completely unoriginal, the droog L-1 thing had already been covered, the lurker speech was pointless, just looks like him trying to look like he's doing work, plus he had commentary on the game yet accompanied it with no meaningful vote."An RVS wagon adds no pressure but I'm going to RVS instead of voting the person I'm questioning", doesn't ring sincere to me, and the statement about RVS wagons was bad enough on it's own.

Is this the case?
As far as I can tell this is the case.
Is that the case?

[Thor665]

And the context - what's that and how does it tie into that case?
And if that's not the case then what's the derp case?

[Thor665]

I actually hate you all - this game is a mess because most of you have to be town. It's derptastic in here.

[Thor665]

State cases and don't rando lynch people "because".
There - free advice.
Oh, also lynch people when someone basically calls out a cop guilty on them when 2 scum are already flipped on Day 4 with a shocking minimum of scum kills and don't ask for a claim - further free advice.

What is this game?

[Thor665]

Oh, and then call out that all of the above is pro-town play, and then drop the conversation like a wet noodle.

[Flubbernugget]

N2 I watched myself... as I thought i'd been shot for using my role

So you're bulletproof too now?

No, Droog was. Im not sure where your getting that from.

That's the only way watching yourself makes sense.

[Whomping Willow]

Revisiting 82 by Originalchris I hate it even more than I did when I first read it, ironically it was completely unoriginal, the droog L-1 thing had already been covered, the lurker speech was pointless, just looks like him trying to look like he's doing work, plus he had commentary on the game yet accompanied it with no meaningful vote."An RVS wagon adds no pressure but I'm going to RVS instead of voting the person I'm questioning", doesn't ring sincere to me, and the statement about RVS wagons was bad enough on it's own.

Is this the case?
As far as I can tell this is the case.
Is that the case?

Yes, my first interaction with your slot is the sole one and comprises the entirety of my read

[Whomping Willow]

And the context - what's that and how does it tie into that case?
And if that's not the case then what's the derp case?

And it's a derp case by definition because?

[Thor665]

Because you can't state it and are trying to duck being held accountable for it.

So I'm getting 'no, that's not the case' from you as regards a point you stated a case and voted my slot.

Can I get a link yet - lackwit?
Or is the goal to make me pull up yet another stab at trying to spot the case?

[Thor665]

Sure, let's play the idiot game of 'derp - spot da case!'

[Thor665]

Okay, I went back and looked.

You added nothing new to the case since then.

So I'm calling you a filthy liar with no case.

Feel free to prove me wrong with a link.
Hell, prove me wrong with just a statement of your case - that would be amazing and I'll accept it as proving me wrong whether or not you had previously stated it.

[Thor665]

Quite frankly my 'lurker case' that i stated early on as your case on me seems to be a quite functional and reasonable way to describe your case on me. The only other addendum you had to it was 'no content'.

Hey - look at you, fighting to avoid giving content. Whoop-de-whoop. Maybe you just spotted that OC was as terrible at playing the game as you appear to be?
What is this gak?

[Whomping Willow]

Is that so?

[Thor665]

Yes.

[Thor665]

I'm calling you a filthy liar with no case.

Feel free to prove me wrong with a link.
Hell, prove me wrong with just a statement of your case - that would be amazing and I'll accept it as proving me wrong whether or not you had previously stated it.

[Whomping Willow]

You're not the boss of me!

[Whomping Willow]

I'm not going to "state a case" on you because I know exactly the dance we're going to go through, if you're actually interested in understanding the read on you then you know what to do, otherwise, you've received all the help you'll get from me.

We aren't going down this road, just read my Iso, ctrl+f Oc and Originalchris, it's there if you actually care to understand the read, but I think we all know if you actually do by this point

[GGG]

Thor, are ypu willing to vote Munk based on the watcher claim?