In post 150, I Am Innocent wrote:flubbernugget, yuni, Nero, and pacman.
Could you talk about these?
In post 150, I Am Innocent wrote:flubbernugget, yuni, Nero, and pacman.
In post 127, AlternateAccount wrote:Now we wait to see if TDA's scumbuddies try to help bail him out or if he'll try to lurk away that epic backtrack...
In post 324, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 323, Garmr wrote:You have no credibility at all When I answer your questions you stop and eventually bring it up again.
Oh, then it should be easy for you. Quote yourself.
In post 98, Garmr wrote:In post 97, TheDudeAbides wrote:ignoring someone's question isn't a hack job.
you were totally misreporting it through and dragonspawn is the towniest slot around besides myself .
In post 101, Garmr wrote:In post 100, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 98, Garmr wrote:In post 97, TheDudeAbides wrote:ignoring someone's question isn't a hack job.
you were totally misreporting it through and dragonspawn is the towniest slot around besides myself .
Dragon spawn seemed to expect me to have information that I simply don't have. I did not misreport on that.
That's also the only interesting thing in his post.
In post 105, Garmr wrote:In post 102, TheDudeAbides wrote:Explain how you think I misreported on anything?
misrepresented spell check fail ;/.
You were obviously misrepresenting this post btw
In post 76, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:I'm buddies with someone I don't know
I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.
Your the one accusing him of being partners with nero. I know this was a joke but you went all serious with this post here and started misrepresenting him here.
In post 110, Garmr wrote:In post 106, TheDudeAbides wrote:There is no misrepresentation at all. He acted as though I should have known that he didn't know Nero and because of that know that he couldn't be buddies with Nero.
No his saying why the hell are you pushing that he and nerocain are buddies if nerocain hasn't posted yet.People who do't understand jokes make me go gaaahhh.
In post 108, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 104, Garmr wrote:tda another one of those types doesn't get humor. Well this will be fun :/ tda do you understand what fun is .
Where's the joke garmr?
In post 33, Garmr wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
Nooo I wanted to be scum with dragon spawn
VOTE: TDA
In post 109, TheDudeAbides wrote:Cause it looks like you're taking this pretty seriously.
I am now ;/
In post 114, Garmr wrote:In post 112, TheDudeAbides wrote:If he'd just said something about Nero not having posted yet, there wouldn't be a problem.
He did but you went out your way to misrepresent it.
In post 119, Garmr wrote:In post 117, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 114, Garmr wrote:In post 112, TheDudeAbides wrote:If he'd just said something about Nero not having posted yet, there wouldn't be a problem.
He did but you went out your way to misrepresent it.
This is simply nonsense. He didn't just say something about Nero not having posted yet.
In post 107, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:
I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet? I'd love to see the reasoning
Can't you even put two and two together this is responding to you.
and this is the joke I made
In post 33, Garmr wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
Nooo I wanted to be scum with dragon spawn
VOTE: TDA
In post 121, Garmr wrote:In post 120, TheDudeAbides wrote:I got that was a joke. It would have made more sense with the wording for you to have said Nero Cain, rather than DS.
I have no idea what your first point is, but since you're scum trying to push a bs misrep case, I don't really care.
What ever your seriously a headache.
In post 302, Garmr wrote:In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made yo. Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
Also if tda was reading what ds said then he would of read it this way.
In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made your Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
This is referring to to to TDA accusing dragonspawn of being nero's buddy. Even through ds didn't get what tda really meant (implying that nero and ds were scum buddies together as a) Tda's reactions to ds were as if he did and then he tried to twist it to put DS in a bad spotlight. That opportunistic behavior is scummy as fuck.
In post 317, Albert B. Rampage wrote:lol fake dayvig
In post 327, Garmr wrote:In post 324, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 323, Garmr wrote:You have no credibility at all When I answer your questions you stop and eventually bring it up again.
Oh, then it should be easy for you. Quote yourself.
Yep you keep bringing up the same subject over and over ds reaction to you. The the same question line is said just in a different way.
You:How did I misrep him
Me:You picked a bit of his original post did a hack job on it and tried to push the burden of proof on him.
You:But that isn't what he meant so anything scummy i did is mute.
Me:It doesn't matter because he didn't mean it that way everyone thought he meant it that way and your hack job and scummy responces to everyone else is why I am pushing my scum read on you not your original post that stirred ds reaction.
You: prove it's a hack job.
Me:
In post 98, Garmr wrote:In post 97, TheDudeAbides wrote:ignoring someone's question isn't a hack job.
you were totally misreporting it through and dragonspawn is the towniest slot around besides myself .
this begins the cycle I was sheeping Alternate reasons on why you were misrepping here.
you answer with this stupid thing
In post 101, Garmr wrote:In post 100, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 98, Garmr wrote:In post 97, TheDudeAbides wrote:ignoring someone's question isn't a hack job.
you were totally misreporting it through and dragonspawn is the towniest slot around besides myself .
Dragon spawn seemed to expect me to have information that I simply don't have. I did not misreport on that.
That's also the only interesting thing in his post.
[\quote]
This is not stupid and was the point. Recall:
In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet? I'd love to see the reasoning
In that post, dragonspawn uses the argument that he couldn't be buddies with Nero because he doesn't know who Nero is. It's disingenuous because that's information that I simply don't have access to, and it's why I asked him about the post.
In post 105, Garmr wrote:In post 102, TheDudeAbides wrote:Explain how you think I misreported on anything?
misrepresented spell check fail ;/.
You were obviously misrepresenting this post btw
In post 76, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:I'm buddies with someone I don't know
I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.
Your the one accusing him of being partners with nero. I know this was a joke but you went all serious with this post here and started misrepresenting him here.
I explain again where you misrepping him.
In post 110, Garmr wrote:In post 106, TheDudeAbides wrote:There is no misrepresentation at all. He acted as though I should have known that he didn't know Nero and because of that know that he couldn't be buddies with Nero.
No his saying why the hell are you pushing that he and nerocain are buddies if nerocain hasn't posted yet.People who do't understand jokes make me go gaaahhh.
In post 108, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 104, Garmr wrote:tda another one of those types doesn't get humor. Well this will be fun :/ tda do you understand what fun is .
Where's the joke garmr?
In post 33, Garmr wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
Nooo I wanted to be scum with dragon spawn
VOTE: TDA
In post 109, TheDudeAbides wrote:Cause it looks like you're taking this pretty seriously.
I am now ;/
What you are ignoring is that he didn't just say that Nero hadn't posted yet. He also made the comment about not knowing Nero. That's the bit that I took issue with.
Explain here how your misrepping/doing a hackjob him.
In post 114, Garmr wrote:In post 112, TheDudeAbides wrote:If he'd just said something about Nero not having posted yet, there wouldn't be a problem.
He did but you went out your way to misrepresent it.
I think you've misread because there's still nothing here that I've misrepped.
This is me pointing where you fucking lied to all our faces.
In post 119, Garmr wrote:In post 117, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 114, Garmr wrote:In post 112, TheDudeAbides wrote:If he'd just said something about Nero not having posted yet, there wouldn't be a problem.
He did but you went out your way to misrepresent it.
This is simply nonsense. He didn't just say something about Nero not having posted yet.
In post 107, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:
I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet? I'd love to see the reasoning
Can't you even put two and two together this is responding to you.
and this is the joke I made
In post 33, Garmr wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
Nooo I wanted to be scum with dragon spawn
VOTE: TDA
I don't see the lie here. Once again, I think you are ignoring that there were two parts two dragonspawn's post.
This is me trying to fucking explain to you how you misrepped him again.
In post 121, Garmr wrote:In post 120, TheDudeAbides wrote:I got that was a joke. It would have made more sense with the wording for you to have said Nero Cain, rather than DS.
I have no idea what your first point is, but since you're scum trying to push a bs misrep case, I don't really care.
What ever your seriously a headache.
This my headache after you ignore what I was saying and tried to push me i want to ride a unicorn that flies by firing rainbows out it's ass and ram its horn into your stomach.
In post 302, Garmr wrote:In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made yo. Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
Also if tda was reading what ds said then he would of read it this way.
In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made your Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
This is referring to to to TDA accusing dragonspawn of being nero's buddy. Even through ds didn't get what tda really meant (implying that nero and ds were scum buddies together as a) Tda's reactions to ds were as if he did and then he tried to twist it to put DS in a bad spotlight. That opportunistic behavior is scummy as fuck.
Look another misrep this one apparently unintentional which you say latter on. The cycle begins again.
In post 327, Garmr wrote:In post 324, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 323, Garmr wrote:You have no credibility at all When I answer your questions you stop and eventually bring it up again.
Oh, then it should be easy for you. Quote yourself.
Yep you keep bringing up the same subject over and over ds reaction to you. The the same question line is said just in a different way.
You:How did I misrep him
Me:You picked a bit of his original post did a hack job on it and tried to push the burden of proof on him.
You:But that isn't what he meant so anything scummy i did is mute.
Me:It doesn't matter because he didn't mean it that way everyone thought he meant it that way and your hack job and scummy responces to everyone else is why I am pushing my scum read on you not your original post that stirred ds reaction.
You: prove it's a hack job.
Me:
In post 98, Garmr wrote:In post 97, TheDudeAbides wrote:ignoring someone's question isn't a hack job.
you were totally misreporting it through and dragonspawn is the towniest slot around besides myself .
this begins the cycle I was sheeping Alternate reasons on why you were misrepping here.
you answer with this stupid thing
In post 101, Garmr wrote:In post 100, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 98, Garmr wrote:In post 97, TheDudeAbides wrote:ignoring someone's question isn't a hack job.
you were totally misreporting it through and dragonspawn is the towniest slot around besides myself .
Dragon spawn seemed to expect me to have information that I simply don't have. I did not misreport on that.
That's also the only interesting thing in his post.
In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet? I'd love to see the reasoning
In post 105, Garmr wrote:In post 102, TheDudeAbides wrote:Explain how you think I misreported on anything?
misrepresented spell check fail ;/.
You were obviously misrepresenting this post btw
In post 76, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:I'm buddies with someone I don't know
I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.
Your the one accusing him of being partners with nero. I know this was a joke but you went all serious with this post here and started misrepresenting him here.
I explain again where you misrepping him.
In post 110, Garmr wrote:In post 106, TheDudeAbides wrote:There is no misrepresentation at all. He acted as though I should have known that he didn't know Nero and because of that know that he couldn't be buddies with Nero.
No his saying why the hell are you pushing that he and nerocain are buddies if nerocain hasn't posted yet.People who do't understand jokes make me go gaaahhh.
In post 108, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 104, Garmr wrote:tda another one of those types doesn't get humor. Well this will be fun :/ tda do you understand what fun is .
Where's the joke garmr?
In post 33, Garmr wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
Nooo I wanted to be scum with dragon spawn
VOTE: TDA
In post 109, TheDudeAbides wrote:Cause it looks like you're taking this pretty seriously.
I am now ;/
Explain here how your misrepping/doing a hackjob him.
In post 114, Garmr wrote:In post 112, TheDudeAbides wrote:If he'd just said something about Nero not having posted yet, there wouldn't be a problem.
He did but you went out your way to misrepresent it.
This is me pointing where you fucking lied to all our faces.
In post 119, Garmr wrote:In post 117, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 114, Garmr wrote:In post 112, TheDudeAbides wrote:If he'd just said something about Nero not having posted yet, there wouldn't be a problem.
He did but you went out your way to misrepresent it.
This is simply nonsense. He didn't just say something about Nero not having posted yet.
In post 107, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:
I'm buddies with someone I don't know and hasn't posted yet? I'd love to see the reasoning
Can't you even put two and two together this is responding to you.
and this is the joke I made
In post 33, Garmr wrote:In post 21, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn is Nero Cain's buddy.
Nooo I wanted to be scum with dragon spawn
VOTE: TDA
This is me trying to fucking explain to you how you misrepped him again.
In post 121, Garmr wrote:In post 120, TheDudeAbides wrote:I got that was a joke. It would have made more sense with the wording for you to have said Nero Cain, rather than DS.
I have no idea what your first point is, but since you're scum trying to push a bs misrep case, I don't really care.
What ever your seriously a headache.
This my headache after you ignore what I was saying and tried to push me i want to ride a unicorn that flies by firing rainbows out it's ass and ram its horn into your stomach.
In post 302, Garmr wrote:In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made yo. Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
Also if tda was reading what ds said then he would of read it this way.
In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made your Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
This is referring to to to TDA accusing dragonspawn of being nero's buddy. Even through ds didn't get what tda really meant (implying that nero and ds were scum buddies together as a) Tda's reactions to ds were as if he did and then he tried to twist it to put DS in a bad spotlight. That opportunistic behavior is scummy as fuck.
Look another misrep this one apparently unintentional which you say latter on. The cycle begins again.
In post 308, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 307, Garmr wrote:In post 305, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 304, Garmr wrote:So your just ignoring his posts claiming them as garbage
I have not ignored his posts.
I did misread the "Claim . . . " one. That was this morning, and I should have read it more carefully later.
When he's been mistaking "buddies with" and buddying a lot of what he's said has been garbage, and when I've never said that he's done the former and he decides to accuse me of backtracking, that's garbage too.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:picking key words in your push against him with out using them in context.
When I've been talking about his posts with the intended meaning, I don't think there should be a problem.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:Do you honestly think your going to gain any sort of traction on a wagon with such lazy and dishonest means.
Well, considering the way my wagons grown, lazy seems to work, I also think that the only time I could be accused of being dishonest is about the "Claim. . . " post, and what can I say, that was a mistake.
In post 303, TheDudeAbides wrote:No, I'm referring to how I read it when I first saw. I saw garbage and a last sentence saying "Claim and started us down this rabbit hole."
This shows you not even bothered about reading his posts in context and are picking out key words. correctly showing you only care about the lynch and not his content.
I never used that against him until he tried to argue that he wasn't pushing for my lynch. As soon as I realized that's not what he said, I backed down.
In post 219, TheDudeAbides wrote:Dragonspawn, if you are confusing buddying with buddies with, you should probably replace out of this game.
In post 308, TheDudeAbides wrote:
In post 237, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 230, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 168, TheDudeAbides wrote:Flubber joins the list of people who don't know what and means.
I didn't realize you could read my mind so tell me why I'm scumreading you?
From the context, it seems that you thinkI misrepped DS, I'd assumed over him saying (to paraphrase) "I don't know Nero, and Nero hasn't posted, so how could I be buddies with him" and me ignoring the second part off the sentence while focussing on the first.
But now that there's this buddies-buddying thing, it could be that. If it's that though, it still means you can't read.
The debates with other people still apply even if ds didn't mean that because everyone assumed he did in the conversation that followed and that's were most of the condemning stuff lays.
In post 237, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 230, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 168, TheDudeAbides wrote:Flubber joins the list of people who don't know what and means.
I didn't realize you could read my mind so tell me why I'm scumreading you?
From the context, it seems that you thinkI misrepped DS, I'd assumed over him saying (to paraphrase) "I don't know Nero, and Nero hasn't posted, so how could I be buddies with him" and me ignoring the second part off the sentence while focussing on the first.
But now that there's this buddies-buddying thing, it could be that. If it's that though, it still means you can't read.
In post 76, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:I'm buddies with someone I don't know
I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.
In post 331, Flubbernugget wrote:Ftr I'm not reading those walls. I'm jus
In post 334, Garmr wrote:Why didn't you try to correct him when he mistook buddying for buddy instead you pretty much laughed in a new players face and told him to quit.
In post 87, dragonspawn wrote:In post 76, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:I'm buddies with someone I don't know
I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.
if you don't know then you clearly can't read. But we both know you can since you managed to edit the post and cut off half the question as well as the request for you to produce some sort of reasoning for your accusation that I was buddying someone who I still haven't even seen a post from.
the question at this point is why go to the lengths of making an accusation, then editing the post asking you to back it up to try to incriminate me. It doesn't make any sense. It's also pretty darn scummy. But is that because you are scum o just completely insane and dishonest? I'm not sure yet. But you've definitely attracted my attention.
so would you please answer the original question of why you think I'm buddying Nero? I fugue the more you talk the easier it will be to determine your alignment.
In post 91, TheDudeAbides wrote:I didn't accuse you of buddying Nero; I said buddies with Nero, and I said it because LOL RVS, and something you said made me think "hmmmmm"
In post 334, Garmr wrote:1.Where have I tried to discount debates with other people?
In post 237, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 230, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 168, TheDudeAbides wrote:Flubber joins the list of people who don't know what and means.
I didn't realize you could read my mind so tell me why I'm scumreading you?
From the context, it seems that you thinkI misrepped DS, I'd assumed over him saying (to paraphrase) "I don't know Nero, and Nero hasn't posted, so how could I be buddies with him" and me ignoring the second part off the sentence while focussing on the first.
But now that there's this buddies-buddying thing, it could be that. If it's that though, it still means you can't read.
In post 154, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: TDA
Though I do find it very interesting that dragonspawn never called out TDA on his misrep and actually tried to argue it as a genuine case.
DGB hopping on the misrep is also yucky.
In post 334, Garmr wrote:2. I realize it was a joke it was your reactions after and you blowing out of proportion that makes you scum and if by some miracle your not scum your a village idiot.
In post 334, Garmr wrote:3.Everything I posted about you so far would be a start to find what i think is condemning
In post 334, Garmr wrote:Even through he took your joke seriously, I would expect a normal townie to say "It was just a joke" but instead you tried to turn it around on him by pushing the burden of proof on him.
In post 334, Garmr wrote:Nope doesn't disprove my point and he wasn't arguing disingenuously.
In post 338, firebound12 wrote:holy shit those quoteception
In post 344, d3x wrote:I believe that's L-3 with 2 weeks left and 2 players that haven't posted even a single time.
While I think the outing of the Neighborhood was freaking stupid on Dude's behalf and Garmr should be ashamed for his part in it, I think the fallout points to TownDude. Scum would already know about the Hood if he was Scum. He'd have no reason to vomit that shit all over the thread.