Tean's latest:
In post 305, Tean Samargo wrote:@Killapenwin
In post 287, killapenwin wrote:@eyestott it is because your votes so far have just followed Tean's, which looks a bit sheepish. Also, Tean has only voted on players that have been voted on already so either him or you (maybe both) are trying to create bandwagons or give them some momentum in my opinion.
As Aneninen said, it is odd that Tean would call you out for sheeping when he himself is being a catalyst for bandwagons.
To start with, it'd be nice if you wouldn't lie when trying to cast suspicion on me. I was the first person who had a non-rvs vote on you when the game started and you should know that. I don't appreciate you lying to try to make me sound worse.
On top of that, I don't like how you're ignoring my posts. You seem to have outright missed #231, and I'd like you to try answering my questions, not just blindly calling me scum because I'm rude.
@Wickedestjr
In post 250, Wickedestjr wrote:
In post 231, Tean Samargo wrote:@eyestott
I find your vote on dav as rather opportunistic. I feel a little bit uncomfortable with my vote along side yours honestly. Right now it feels as if you are sheeping the biggest bandwagon.
Now this is a weird thing for
you
to say! Especially considering you cast the vote for davesaz immediately preceding eyestott’s vote (so you weren’t much faster to hop aboard). It also seems convenient how you start to cast doubt on the wagon, ‘coincidentally’, just after it starts to lose momentum.
Could you show me where I started to cast doubt on a wagon? I'm not seeing it. Also, I didn't dislike eyestott's vote for jumping on the wagon, it was for jumping on it with shitty reasoning. He finds dav his top scumread but he doesn't vote until dav isn't at L-2 because he's scared of dav getting hammered? If he thinks dav is scum why the fuck would he be so concerned about him getting lynched?
I believe you are mistaken, you were in fact the second person to vote for me so don't call me a liar on that or making it up.
In post 51, copper223 wrote:VOTE: Killapen
@Wicked
BBT jumping on things is more likely to be town and Mastin starting with a pseudo "confirm post analysis" on what I thought were syncs on confirmation time and words used (I missed the ready reference in the PM tbf.) is consistent with my mental image of her as a town player.
In post 55, Tean Samargo wrote:A haiku with love:
I don't like penguins.
Go back to Antarctica.
Vote: killapenwin
You want me to comment on all your posts then? Just have your iso open in another tab.
#34 //you saying ready
#55 // a haiku vote on me, no reason given
#58 // claiming the vote is now real but no reasons given beyond a generic 'not liking my posts'
#59 // nothing
#93 // already commented on this crude attempt to make me look insignificant, though I didn't respond to it in it's entirety so for the final paragraphs: no I can't vote everyone who does a RVS vote. I thought that would be obvious so I skated over that nonsensical argument. You may notice how copper put a vote on me and yet I didn't call him scum?
#97 // a poke at Vettrock to scumhunt, mute- could just be filler
#163 // a poke at BBT being inactive, though given how hard BBT is buddying you right now this could have just been a pre-emptive post to distance yourself from him
#174 // more trying to distance yourself from him even though he still hasn't said anything
#182 // comment on Dave's read list being mostly null, glaringly obvious to everyone so not much value in it.
#189 // The first half-reasoned vote you do and it is on Dave, I could have liked this post except you had to sully it by saying you can't have a coherent discussion with me.
#191 // a vote count
#231 // criticises Dave for no strong reads though really you haven't given much away yourself, just tunnelling me and a few comments on 3 others players some of whom have just been inactive. You make a point against Eyestott for sheeping votes and yet, he has been following your votes??
Then you try to justify your name calling by citing some obscure youtube video, like it was just a joke and it was all ok.
Well guess what? No. If you think it is bad for someone to have a vote on you because they didn't get your joke then that would make you a hypocrite because that is exactly why you made your 'RVS' vote a real one with me.
Then criticism of my 'then' latest post which I will respond to:
Your interaction with me has been poor, I know I am town so for you to be voting me on the back of what I have only seen as very weak reasoning I do find scummy. Many others also happen to find Eyestott's actions to be questionable, too (including yourself). You obviously didn't notice Copper put a vote on me but in my read of him I didn't call him scummy so I am not just attacking those voting for me. One or both of you tried a bandwagon me so I would be happy to put a vote on either of you since there is a fair chance one of you will come out scum.
I think you really are overselling your contribution to town and the above is evidence of that.
#233 // asks copper about playing on other sites?
#235 // revokes request.
#305 // Already evidenced the part about me not lying at the top of this post, #231 is answered above and here is my reason for not answering it: I was getting fed up of having to tackle your distracting posts and didn't really want to do one of these long time consuming posts so that I might actually have time to get some reads on some other people. But since you are kicking up a fuss for me not responding, here it is.
BBT is seems to be buddying you hard, possible scum team?
